Bungie Universe
This topic has moved here: Subject: Halo reach can be called not cannon now.
  • Subject: Halo reach can be called not cannon now.
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: Halo reach can be called not cannon now.

CGC FTW

We all know how reach destroyed our beloved cannon, but I think we can see it as not cannon. 343 will soon own halo if they already dont, their cannon will then superseed bungies. The new books are 343, halo reach was bungie. so that is why I think that halo reach is officially not cannon.



[Edited on 07.09.2011 11:50 AM PDT]

  • 07.09.2011 10:28 AM PDT
Subject: Halo can be called not cannon now.

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."


Posted by: Trogit
We all know how reach destroyed our beloved cannon, but I think we can see it as not cannon. 343 will soon own halo if they already dont, their cannon will then superseed bungies. The new books are 343, halo reach was bungie. so that is why I think that halo reach is officially not cannon.



343 sees Reach as official canon, so your argument is invalid.

Oh yeah, it's CANON, not CANNON.

/thread.

  • 07.09.2011 10:30 AM PDT

so no emile shotgun snipeing, no more Kat drivers?

to bad I liked reach's story it was good not better than halo 2's but still good.

  • 07.09.2011 10:30 AM PDT

CGC FTW

were did they say they it was canon, please show me

  • 07.09.2011 10:32 AM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."


Posted by: Trogit
were did they say they it was canon, please show me


They've been releasing waypoint videos featuring the events of the books and the games together, if they didn't consider the game canon then they wouldn't use those events.

Again /thread.

  • 07.09.2011 10:35 AM PDT


Posted by: RKOSNAKE

Posted by: Trogit
were did they say they it was canon, please show me


They've been releasing waypoint videos featuring the events of the books and the games together, if they didn't consider the game canon then they wouldn't use those events.

Again /thread.


so reach has a chance to live?

[Edited on 07.09.2011 10:37 AM PDT]

  • 07.09.2011 10:37 AM PDT

Personally, I never considered Reach canon in the first place.

  • 07.09.2011 10:37 AM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."


Posted by: firecrakcer

Posted by: RKOSNAKE

Posted by: Trogit
were did they say they it was canon, please show me


They've been releasing waypoint videos featuring the events of the books and the games together, if they didn't consider the game canon then they wouldn't use those events.

Again /thread.


so reach has a chance to live?


Yes, besides, 343 is taking over Reach in August 2nd if I'm not mistaken.

  • 07.09.2011 10:38 AM PDT

CGC FTW

they may post vids on it but they never said it was canon

  • 07.09.2011 10:40 AM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."


Posted by: Trogit
they may post vids on it but they never said it was canon


Why would they depict the events of the Fall of Reach along with the ones in Halo: Reach if they don't consider it canon?

God, the intelligence of some members amazes me.

  • 07.09.2011 10:54 AM PDT

CGC FTW

the lack of yours amazes me.

The posted that while bungie was still in charge.

Ill end this thread here, you have your opinions I have my facts. you can now go crawl under your bridge, troll.

  • 07.09.2011 11:08 AM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."


Posted by: Trogit
the lack of yours amazes me.

The posted that while bungie was still in charge.

Ill end this thread here, you have your opinions I have my facts. you can now go crawl under your bridge, troll.


Troll? Me? Ha! The single fact that they are using Reach into their videos proves that they consider it canon, you're just too angry to realize it.

  • 07.09.2011 11:11 AM PDT


Posted by: RKOSNAKE

Posted by: Trogit
the lack of yours amazes me.

The posted that while bungie was still in charge.

Ill end this thread here, you have your opinions I have my facts. you can now go crawl under your bridge, troll.


Troll? Me? Ha! The single fact that they are using Reach into their videos proves that they consider it canon, you're just too angry to realize it.


I think the phrase you're looking for for the OP would be: UMAD? :D

  • 07.09.2011 11:26 AM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."


Posted by: BlueRuby2k10

Posted by: RKOSNAKE

Posted by: Trogit
the lack of yours amazes me.

The posted that while bungie was still in charge.

Ill end this thread here, you have your opinions I have my facts. you can now go crawl under your bridge, troll.


Troll? Me? Ha! The single fact that they are using Reach into their videos proves that they consider it canon, you're just too angry to realize it.


I think the phrase you're looking for for the OP would be: UMAD? :D


Indeed, he mad bro.

Here's one of 343's videos, Mr OP.

  • 07.09.2011 11:28 AM PDT

OP, PROVE 343 does not consider Reach canon.

  • 07.09.2011 11:32 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

"Time was your ally human. But now it has abandoned you. The Forerunners....have returned. And this tomb... is now yours". - The Didact

OP will fail at providing evidence,the burden of proof is on him.

Reach is canon deal with it.

  • 07.09.2011 11:34 AM PDT

CGC FTW

I never said they didnt consider it canon, just they never said it was canon. since they own the halo title now their info trumps anything bungie did and the books were by 343.

  • 07.09.2011 11:48 AM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."


Posted by: Trogit
I never said they didnt consider it canon, just they never said it was canon. since they own the halo title now their info trumps anything bungie did and the books were by 343.


Too bad that Games > Books.

  • 07.09.2011 11:49 AM PDT

CGC FTW

343>bungie

  • 07.09.2011 11:51 AM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."


Posted by: Trogit
343>bungie


It still applies, 343 Games > 343 Books, and since 343 is taking over Reach, then it will still trump the books.

  • 07.09.2011 11:52 AM PDT

CGC FTW

they didnt make the reach story, they are takeing over the multiplayer. the campaign is still all of bungies stuff. so 343book>bungiegame

  • 07.09.2011 11:54 AM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."


Posted by: Trogit
they didnt make the reach story, they are takeing over the multiplayer. the campaign is still all of bungies stuff. so 343book>bungiegame


You should take a look in the guide to Halo canon thread, you will see that no matter what, Games trump Books, 343 was involved in the making of Halo: Legends, and it's still trumped by games, same with the encyclopedia and Halo: evolutions.

  • 07.09.2011 11:58 AM PDT


Posted by: Trogit
I never said they didnt consider it canon, just they never said it was canon. since they own the halo title now their info trumps anything bungie did and the books were by 343.


So, because 343 has not said whether or not CE, 2, of 3 is canon or not, that makes it non-canon?

Using your logic.

  • 07.09.2011 12:10 PM PDT

Expressing my strong liberal views without shame. Favorite quotes below:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
"One starts to live when he can live outside himself."

- Albert Einstein

After doing some careful inspection, Reach did not destroy established canon. It changed certain elements slightly, but there weren't any complete replacements.

  • 07.09.2011 12:15 PM PDT
Subject: Halo reach can be called not cannon now.

Adepto In Meus Campester
Posted by: ParagonRenegade
You were totally and absolutely correct in every way, I don't know why we were arguing, you're so amazing I should never have doubted you.

Reach has always been non-canon.

  • 07.09.2011 12:15 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4