- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: ObbiQuiet
Posted by: johny joe
Posted by: ObbiQuiet
Posted by: johny joe
Posted by: ObbiQuiet
Posted by: Liton
it is mathmaticly imposible for our planet to be the only one with life on it.
Psh, we don't know that with certainty, considering, outside of stars, we really know very little about planetary formation or things that could lead to life. It's possible that we are extremely rare - a fluke if you will.
Then again, it might not be. Other conditionally perfect places in the universe may exist to support life - but since we don't know enough about that subject yet we can't say for certain, and we CERTAINLY cannot conclude it's "mathematically impossible."
considering the fact there are billions of stars in plain view at night, and each star can support gravity, light, and heat to many planets, i suspect life is more common that u think.
Planets? We haven't been able to detect much more than stars, aside from the occasional gas giant. We simply don't know if water-bearing planets are common in the universe, or even probable.
ya, planets dont emit light, so we cant see em.
They reflect light, though.
Thing is, we simply don't know. Yes, it may be probably, yes it may be possible, but these are all "maybe"s. For him to say it's mathematically impossible when it hasn't even been shown to be mathematically possible is absurd.
ya, we dont even know if theres anything past Pluto (or if plutos a planet at that) so how would we know if theres a planet in another Solar System like 13469712645 BILLION lightyears away (im no astrollager)