- Heliossoileh1
- |
- Senior Member
δόξει τις ἀμαθεῖ σοφὰ λέγων οὐκ εὖ φρονεῖν.
Euripides, Bacchae. 480.
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
I didnt feel like going through all your points, because most of them are uninteresting assumptions based on a few posts, which show nothing about who a person is.
I believe I've read enough of your posts to justify the inferences made above. You're welcome to demonstrate how any of my claims are incorrect or unfair.
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
For example I could say that you are some kid with a semi large vocab, who uses words that are overly large to overstate your points.
But this claim would be false: I am twenty years old, so scarcely a "kid" by any conventional understanding of that term, and the vocabulary I use is necessary to communicate my point(s) to the degree of precision I desire. I don't know what it is to "overstate" something.
I thank you for the compliment nevertheless.
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
Im sure you are rather different outside the forums, however I cannot be certain due to the fact I have never had the urge to play with you. Therefore I can never be sure that my assumption is correct, this of course being true for you as well.
If you're referring to the language I use, yes, I talk like this in everyday life. This is fortunate, since I wouldn't be taken seriously in either of my ideal career paths if I didn't.
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
Besides even if I did explain myself to you, which I am not going to, how much of it would you believe to begin with....
That would depend on how compelling your argument was, of course.