Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: DId you like Halo being transferred to 343i?
  • Subject: DId you like Halo being transferred to 343i?
Subject: DId you like Halo being transferred to 343i?

Bungie decided giving Halo to 343i and 343i decides to make Halo 4 that continues off the part when Master Chief uses a warthog to jump onto the ship.

  • 07.24.2011 10:45 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

All I can say is, it's in better hands.

What were Bungie thinking killing off enemies for us in Halo 3?

Pelicans that shoot behind them (and don't give a -blam!- about friendly fire), going to a certain point kills off enemies in the previous area (i.e. The Ark. I've had it happen in two instances), killing all the Flood on Halo (the level) (it's a timed battle), killing the Phantoms on Sierra 117 regardless of the Pelican's missile blast missing (that's right, even if 1 of the missile barrages miss, the Phantom will still be destroyed).

When they could have just used loading points to remove the enemies from the level.

As for the Halo fight, why not just make the Flood suddenly lax and allow Johnson, Arbiter, and Chief to proceed? Or just make it so that the Flood put 90% of their focus on Sentinels. Then when they came out, the Flood that didn't die in the previous battle would be more overwhelming.

Scripting makes this game unrealistic at some points.

[Edited on 07.24.2011 11:55 AM PDT]

  • 07.24.2011 11:52 AM PDT

Massive fan of Halo series. Halo Combat Evolved=Best Game EVER! Computer programmer(C/C++, C#). Loves low-poly models. Regular pirate of software that SHOULD be free. Follower of Church of Emacs. GNU!!! User of Windows 7. Enjoys working on games(game development). More of a content developer than a engine programmer; more fun.

All I can say is, no.

Bungie are the original owners and through my eyes always will be. But from what I've seen of the Halo 4 trailer and Master Chief's new armour and pistol, it looks like 343i are doing a good job. Keep it up 343i. ;)

NOTE: If all else fails you've always got Halo 1, 2, 3, ODST and Reach to play on.

  • 07.24.2011 1:47 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Fabled Legendary Member
  • gamertag: WjB79
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Frasier Crane
I'm not making excuses. I never claimed to be good. I have never played any colonel better than me though.


Top 1% Overall Player for H3 on Halocharts
50 Team Slayer Gen and BTB 5 Star


Posted by: xxPH4N70Mxx
Bungie are the original owners and through my eyes always will be.


Bungie are? And obviously Bungie will always be the original owners, it's a fact, how would you be able to see it differently?

  • 07.24.2011 3:44 PM PDT
  • gamertag: daxder
  • user homepage:

BLARG!!

  • 07.24.2011 3:51 PM PDT

____________(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
l | --------____.`=====.-.~:________\___|================[oo]
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)

Bungie's monkeys of death are coming, this is your only warning!!!!

Wrong. Bungie sold the rights to Microsoft then Microsoft formed the company 343i

And no i think Microsoft are too money happy and trying to milk a great story. If it was up to me i think Halo (As much as i hate saying this) should have died at the end of Halo 3.

  • 07.24.2011 4:19 PM PDT

Relax. I'd rather not piss this thing off.

-Master Chief

Bungie shouldnt of sold them the rights and ended at Halo Reach and start a new game that has some of the same qualities as halo.

  • 07.24.2011 4:26 PM PDT

Posted by: Textually Harass
Posted by: ShieldyPoo
U Mirin?

Why don't you do any work on your chest or legs or something? You look like a cartoon character.

Yes I'm glad it's being transfered. Bungie failed immensely with Halo Reach. I want competent people to make the next Halo game.

  • 07.24.2011 5:29 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I'm thrilled.
What was the last good thing Bungie did for Halo? The last Halo 3 map pack was sub-par, and everything to do with Reach pretty much sucks.

I am extremely happy. I want to see what 343i does with H4.

All I ask, is that H4 has a ranking system like Halo 3, except with some major fixes.
Seriously, -blam!- the credits system.

  • 07.24.2011 7:26 PM PDT

Im partially glad 343 have halo now cause bungie ruined halo with their inconsistency but from what halo 4 and anniversary look like, this ain't going to turn out well, 343 better be careful of what stuff they are putting into anniversary and halo 4.

  • 07.25.2011 1:52 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I'm listeni- Oh wait I don't give a -blam!- what you have to say.


Posted by: Sliding Ghost
All I can say is, it's in better hands.

What were Bungie thinking killing off enemies for us in Halo 3?

Pelicans that shoot behind them (and don't give a -blam!- about friendly fire), going to a certain point kills off enemies in the previous area (i.e. The Ark. I've had it happen in two instances), killing all the Flood on Halo (the level) (it's a timed battle), killing the Phantoms on Sierra 117 regardless of the Pelican's missile blast missing (that's right, even if 1 of the missile barrages miss, the Phantom will still be destroyed).

When they could have just used loading points to remove the enemies from the level.

As for the Halo fight, why not just make the Flood suddenly lax and allow Johnson, Arbiter, and Chief to proceed? Or just make it so that the Flood put 90% of their focus on Sentinels. Then when they came out, the Flood that didn't die in the previous battle would be more overwhelming.

Scripting makes this game unrealistic at some points.
wait are you serious? You actually call those problems with the game? Wow.

  • 07.25.2011 5:06 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Frasier Crane

wait are you serious? You actually call those problems with the game? Wow.
To the average player, these are hardly noticeable, because they play through the campaign normally.

But to players who enjoy having control over parts of the campaign, this stuff is important.

  • 07.25.2011 5:09 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I'm listeni- Oh wait I don't give a -blam!- what you have to say.


Posted by: Sliding Ghost

Posted by: Frasier Crane

wait are you serious? You actually call those problems with the game? Wow.
To the average player, these are hardly noticeable, because they play through the campaign normally.

But to players who enjoy having control over parts of the campaign, this stuff is important.
how many times have you played through the campaign?

  • 07.25.2011 6:19 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

5

Yup.

  • 07.25.2011 8:58 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Frasier Crane

Posted by: Sliding Ghost

Posted by: Frasier Crane

wait are you serious? You actually call those problems with the game? Wow.
To the average player, these are hardly noticeable, because they play through the campaign normally.

But to players who enjoy having control over parts of the campaign, this stuff is important.
how many times have you played through the campaign?
Numerous times offline.

Right now, I'm on The Covenant merging the half Flood glitch with a certain loading glitch.

  • 07.25.2011 10:47 AM PDT

i think they did fine. 343i made Halo wars didnt they?
That was an AWESOME game XD

  • 07.25.2011 11:05 AM PDT