- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Member of Bungie.net for nearly three years, still continuing!
Enjoy what you have and live on.
My gamertag is Elder Bias
Posted by: raganok99
Posted by: BlueRuby2k10
Posted by: Neutrino
*sigh* Damn my pride. Damn it.
Posted by: raganok99
All right, buddy.[/quote]
I am not your buddy so don't do that.
Posted by: raganok99
Do you realize that being childish over encyclopedia isn't getting you to anywhere? And in fact, it is canon, whether you like it or not. Also that errors was from first edition... *facepalm* and I own second edition, I can tell is that it is heavily edited and it even removed that quote from "ilovebees" thing. Also second edition is new as well, it has updated info from Halo wars, Halo 3 ODST, all of those novels except Cryptum. So I'm pretty it is reliable source and even it is canon.
You do not seem to understand anything that has been said concerning the issue about Believe. The fact that the Encyclopaedia contains Believe and touts it as canon means that the Encyclopaedia is in error, because Believe was non-canon, (Quite rightly so) and is in contradiction with established events in Halo 3.
Master Chief was never captured at the Battle of Voi like Believe depicted, and apparently it implied his death at that point, which is rubbish.
The fact that the date is not explicit, but rather hidden with only an astute fan being able to decipher it, when the Encyclopaedia previously contained other more blatant errors means that to trust this as 343 Industries intent in the face of such poor editing, and Believes controversial canonical validity, is unwise.
I cannot simplify it anymore. Think like a sheep if you want, but anyone with half a brain cell would realize the amount of problems that Believe has, and the suspicious circumstances of that date being included in the Encyclopaedia when such poor editing was apparent.
Posted by: raganok99
Obviously incapable to make proper debate? You jest. That's completely disrespectful to me and perhaps I wouldn't read your post anymore since you're still blind to that Covies and UNSC will "magically" appear at Halo 4 despite loads of evidence was shown that IT WON'T APPEAR AT HALO 4!
*sighs again*
I'm not going to explain why ad hominem is illogical and childish, you can look that up for yourself.
"and perhaps I wouldn't read your post anymore since you're still blind to that Covies and UNSC will "magically" appear"
In other words, you will be willfully ignorant and bias. And who said anything about magic? The solutions brought to you are far from that. Go and re-read my analogy with Cryptum's plot.
"despite loads of evidence"
This made me laugh a little. Your evidence thus far:
* Statements made by Frankie, one of which no one can even be sure exists, and both of which have no context to them at all.
* Halo 3 Marketing material, the problems with which I outlined in a footnote in a post above. ^
* The Encyclopaedia, which was previously slammed for rubbish editing for including false material, which draws on Believe material which was previously considered non-canon and...false material in itself.
Posted by: raganok99
Um, I have read Cryptum. I know what it happens, etc. So don't make any assumptions that I never read all novels. Sadly for you, I have.
Uhhhh...Where did I say that you had not read Cryptum? Where did I even imply that in my previous response to you?
Posted by: raganok99
As with your least experience with Halo, I would say that you don't understand much about Halo.
And how did you arrive at this conclusion? How do you know how long I have been following this franchise for?
What has that even got to do with anything?
Posted by: raganok99
It's funny that newcomers to Halo would want to see more covies and unsc in action in future games despite that there is six halo games for that: (Halo CE, Halo 2, Halo 3, Halo 3 ODST, Halo Wars and Halo Reach) in a span of ten years of fighting Covies.
Yeah, 10 years of fighting against Covenant. Maybe what fans want to see is the opposite? UNSC and Covenant on the same side? Perhaps they want to see the progress made in the post Halo 3 universe?
The Flood is a threat to both sides, as is sure to be this ancient evil. (Providing they are not the same of course)
Posted by: raganok99
Now, new Halo trilogy is announced by 343i and Frankie says no purple in Halo 4, it means that no covies, also no UNSC there as well.
How on Earth does no purple imply no UNSC?
Anyway, if you look a few pages back I have already tackled the OP along with that quote.
Posted by: raganok99
It's time for us to fight against Precursors/Flood or maybe some rogue Forerunners.
I don't see how that excludes the UNSC/Covenant from being a part of the fight against them. Naturally, one would assume such a large scale threat to include them.
Halo 4 is focused on Master Chief's destiny, not humanity's destiny
Does Greg Bear not say that one of Halo's themes is to ask the question of what it means to be Human? Halo is centered around Humanity and its place and role in the galaxy. About Reclaiming their lost empire and taking up the Mantle. It would not make a whole lot of sense for that arc to remain unresolved in the new trilogy, as it is one of the core themes.
or human covenant war
Who said that it was?
I think a Human-Covenant alliance, then a conflict in the alliance halfway through the game would make for some drama, and wild firefights.
Not going happen since info from Glasslands confirmed that Humans are keeping its alliance with Elites. And again, Covenant is collapsed. There is no Covenant anymore.
And, Neurtino
Listen to yourself. Encyclopedia is canon whether you don't like it or whatever. Also I'm using second edition WHERE IT REMOVED THAT PART AS YOU MENTIONED AND ALSO IT had heavily edited to fix the errors...
And I still believe that Halo 4 won't have non-existent Covenant or UNSC anyways. We'll be just fighting against Flood or Precursors, that's it. Maybe new alien species.
What an exciting game.
Just saying, in a page of an article talking about Halo: Anniversary, and Halo 4, it says that "Obviously, Chief will take the center stage in fighting Covenant and Flood again."
This may not be very valid, but we don't know how much to writer of that article knows about the game.
I'll fetch the link...
Anybody with half brain knows that article is about Halo CEA, not Halo 4...
Try again.