- grey101
- |
- Fabled Mythic Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Deva Path
Posted by: DecepticonCobra
We are all going to get banned aren't we?
Posted by: ShadowSpy117
Posted by: grey101
Posted by: ShadowSpy117
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.
not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]
Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]
1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.
The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.
2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.
3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.
4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.
5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.
6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.[/quote]
I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.
Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.
You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.
Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.
I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.
[/quote]
Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.
the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.
yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.
Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.
Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.[/quote]
So you call "Fairly awesome" godly.
I even said my K/D wasn't good.
Master Chief used what armor lock should have been to survive a fall from orbit.
Both forces had Active Camo systems.
All UNSC forces used a Jetpack in Space ops before.
Cortana used Holograms of the Chief and his team in First Strike to confuse elites.
Drop Shield is a Human bubble shield.
Sprint is how fast a spartan should run.
Evade is a natural elite move, that bungie was just now able to allow players to use.
1. since you were talking about "destroying novas" like it was a daily thing i expected your K/D to atleast be better than mine. and your K/D isn't "fairly awesome", like i said i was disappointed. No, you said your K/D isn't good because of blah blah blah, not "mine K/D isn't good".
2. That is a completely different system and has a completely different function. you clearly don't know more than Rag does.
3. the UNSC only had active camo because the reversed engineered it from the covenant, even then that wasn't until late in the war.
4. Um no she didn't and page number please.
5.the bubble shield looks more human in design anyway, not to mention we don't know who built it since there are conflicting statements.
6. A spartan would run far faster than that.
7. um, my aunts cat can "evade" also
I never said daily, whenever I'm with my friends.
I know the 2 different camos, Photoreactive Paneling.
And the Covenant have shields that act as Camo.
On the Flagship Elite Hunt and kill teams were searching for the Chief, Haverson, johnson, Polaski, and Locklear, so Cortana used holoprojecters to create holograms and electronic ghosts of them to confuse elites.
I win on the Drop Shield.
Spartans can run faster i know, I still win though.
I still win on evade.
Armor Abilities are as much a part of halo as the vehicles.
1. so you can only beat novas when playing with your friends? well your K/d supports that. along with the fact you take pride in something like that, a decent player wouldn't be surprised at the fact nor brag about it.
2. I really want to see where you are getting the hologram stuff because i never heard of that.
3. you don't "win" anything.
4. you don't "win" anything.
The point i was saying is anything with a certain body type can roll, and spartans can run much faster than "sprint". you are just glowing with ignorance.
no the -blam!- they are not