Bungie Universe
This topic has moved here: Subject: FW: Help Save The Halo 3 Community
  • Subject: FW: Help Save The Halo 3 Community
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: FW: Help Save The Halo 3 Community

ALL HALO 3 FANS LISTEN UP.

September 25th marks the 4 year anniversary of Halo 3. We will celebrate this day by keeping the Halo 3 community alive and playing it at 2pm Eastern Time. We will hopefully make the servers as populated as they were before, and prevent Bungie from taking down the Halo 3 online servers to make us play Halo Reach, while also bringing the original Halo experience back to life. Past This And Post It Every where

  • 08.01.2011 8:33 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?

Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?

  • 08.01.2011 8:36 PM PDT

XxXD3LuuX3 X luuC1d17YXxX


Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?


This post needs more anger.

  • 08.01.2011 8:38 PM PDT

"I will show you how a true Prussian officer fights!"

"And i will show you where the iron crosses grow..."

- "Cross of Iron"


Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?


Opinion.

Anyway OT i don't think the Halo 3 community needs saving there will always be people playing Halo 3 even when Halo 4 comes out.

  • 08.01.2011 9:16 PM PDT


Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?


Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.

  • 08.01.2011 9:19 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Don't know why it calls me rubuilt gymnast 7, it's really UNSC595 in case you were wondering and I have played all of those games online

Don't you people get it?! Preserve a piece of Halo History and just play Halo 3 for a couple of hours! DK STEP UP, count me in

  • 08.01.2011 9:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?


Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.


1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.

  • 08.01.2011 9:29 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Member of Bungie.net for nearly three years, still continuing!

Enjoy what you have and live on.

My gamertag is Elder Bias


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?


Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.


Whoever liked Reach isn't Halo fan as well.

Surely you know that Halo Reach is not even Halo. Halo CE, and 2 is actual Halo.

Halo: Reach's kill times is SLOW! That is what it made multiplayer bad. Broken bloom, unbalanced AA, glitches, game altered to casual players like you. And your ranks matters nothing because you just invest your time to get meaningless credits. Also Reach's storyline broke the canon and it has many inconsistencies that I would dare to not explain.

Also Halo 3 sucks too. BR being overpowered and graphics being cartoony. Also storyline was boring.

Sorry but I disagree with your OPINION

[Edited on 08.01.2011 9:42 PM PDT]

  • 08.01.2011 9:41 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Do not waste your tears, I was not born to watch the world grow dim. Life is not measured in years, but by the deeds of men.

Posted by: goldhawk
We should know better, because we are better.

There is nothing wrong with cynicism. Don't bash someone over their views.

  • 08.01.2011 9:52 PM PDT


Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?


Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.


1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.


I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.

  • 08.01.2011 10:02 PM PDT

I'll be busy playing the hell out of Gears of War 3. Soo..no.

  • 08.01.2011 10:04 PM PDT

Vengeance only leads to an ongoing cycle of hatred.

Yes. Halo 3 doesn't suck and it shouldn't die. -_-"

Count me in. I'll be playing September 25th. Never Forget.

  • 08.01.2011 10:06 PM PDT


Posted by: raganok99

Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?


Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.


Whoever liked Reach isn't Halo fan as well.

Surely you know that Halo Reach is not even Halo. Halo CE, and 2 is actual Halo.

Halo: Reach's kill times is SLOW! That is what it made multiplayer bad. Broken bloom, unbalanced AA, glitches, game altered to casual players like you. And your ranks matters nothing because you just invest your time to get meaningless credits. Also Reach's storyline broke the canon and it has many inconsistencies that I would dare to not explain.

Also Halo 3 sucks too. BR being overpowered and graphics being cartoony. Also storyline was boring.

Sorry but I disagree with your OPINION


I never said rank meant anything, my skill does, isn't my fault that Bungie made a crappy ranking system. They could have kept the EXP/Trueskill system and added credtis that allow you buy armor that is available after you win enough matches. And I am a Halo fan, because I am a Halo Historian probably know more about the Characters and story than you do.

  • 08.01.2011 10:08 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

Whoever liked Reach isn't Halo fan as well.

Surely you know that Halo Reach is not even Halo. Halo CE, and 2 is actual Halo.

Halo: Reach's kill times is SLOW! That is what it made multiplayer bad. Broken bloom, unbalanced AA, glitches, game altered to casual players like you. And your ranks matters nothing because you just invest your time to get meaningless credits. Also Reach's storyline broke the canon and it has many inconsistencies that I would dare to not explain.

Also Halo 3 sucks too. BR being overpowered and graphics being cartoony. Also storyline was boring.

Sorry but I disagree with your OPINION

I am a Halo Historian probably know more about the Characters and story than you do.


that is an extremely bold and ignorant claim i doubt you can back up.

gamertag please?

  • 08.01.2011 10:11 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.


I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.



Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.


** you play a crap load of BTB and living dead, so that is going to get your KD up :/ not to mention you have a few objective games also.


Try playing rumble pit and more team slayer/squad slayer.

[Edited on 08.01.2011 10:20 PM PDT]

  • 08.01.2011 10:18 PM PDT


Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.


I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.



Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.


So you call "Fairly awesome" godly.
I even said my K/D wasn't good.
Master Chief used what armor lock should have been to survive a fall from orbit.
Both forces had Active Camo systems.
All UNSC forces used a Jetpack in Space ops before.
Cortana used Holograms of the Chief and his team in First Strike to confuse elites.
Drop Shield is a Human bubble shield.
Sprint is how fast a spartan should run.
Evade is a natural elite move, that bungie was just now able to allow players to use.

  • 08.01.2011 10:24 PM PDT


Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.


I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.



Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.


** you play a crap load of BTB and living dead, so that is going to get your KD up :/ not to mention you have a few objective games also.


Try playing rumble pit and more team slayer/squad slayer.


I play Living Dead with a Friend rarley gets on Halo because he is more dedicated to Gears, I play invasion, BTB, and Squadslayer, what of it?
I think it's harder if there's more people trying kill you.
I also play BTB and Invasion because I like to be Tactical with my team of friends, thats why we beat the tar out of people like you.

  • 08.01.2011 10:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.[/quote]

I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.

[/quote]

Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.[/quote]

So you call "Fairly awesome" godly.
I even said my K/D wasn't good.
Master Chief used what armor lock should have been to survive a fall from orbit.
Both forces had Active Camo systems.
All UNSC forces used a Jetpack in Space ops before.
Cortana used Holograms of the Chief and his team in First Strike to confuse elites.
Drop Shield is a Human bubble shield.
Sprint is how fast a spartan should run.
Evade is a natural elite move, that bungie was just now able to allow players to use.



1. since you were talking about "destroying novas" like it was a daily thing i expected your K/D to atleast be better than mine. and your K/D isn't "fairly awesome", like i said i was disappointed. No, you said your K/D isn't good because of blah blah blah, not "mine K/D isn't good".

2. That is a completely different system and has a completely different function. you clearly don't know more than Rag does.

3. the UNSC only had active camo because the reversed engineered it from the covenant, even then that wasn't until late in the war.

4. Um no she didn't and page number please.

5.the bubble shield looks more human in design anyway, not to mention we don't know who built it since there are conflicting statements.

6. A spartan would run far faster than that.

7. um, my aunts cat can "evade" also

  • 08.01.2011 10:32 PM PDT


Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.


I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.



Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.


** you play a crap load of BTB and living dead, so that is going to get your KD up :/ not to mention you have a few objective games also.


Try playing rumble pit and more team slayer/squad slayer.


I checked your GT aswell, your a campaign and firefight farmer. So you can't say crap Mister Iduntwannarankuplegitly.

  • 08.01.2011 10:32 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Member of Bungie.net for nearly three years, still continuing!

Enjoy what you have and live on.

My gamertag is Elder Bias


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: raganok99

Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?


Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.


Whoever liked Reach isn't Halo fan as well.

Surely you know that Halo Reach is not even Halo. Halo CE, and 2 is actual Halo.

Halo: Reach's kill times is SLOW! That is what it made multiplayer bad. Broken bloom, unbalanced AA, glitches, game altered to casual players like you. And your ranks matters nothing because you just invest your time to get meaningless credits. Also Reach's storyline broke the canon and it has many inconsistencies that I would dare to not explain.

Also Halo 3 sucks too. BR being overpowered and graphics being cartoony. Also storyline was boring.

Sorry but I disagree with your OPINION


I never said rank meant anything, my skill does, isn't my fault that Bungie made a crappy ranking system. They could have kept the EXP/Trueskill system and added credtis that allow you buy armor that is available after you win enough matches. And I am a Halo fan, because I am a Halo Historian probably know more about the Characters and story than you do.


Excuse me...

Don't ever try that trick. You say that you know more about Halo than I do? Oh wow, bad move.

You. Are. Not. Halo. Historian. If you're not going to provide a proof that you are actual Halo historian.

I have been with Halo for ten years. (only I found out about Bungie forums as I heard from my friends in 2009).

I am sorry for being harsh but that is what I am really when someone brags that someone knows more halo than I.

So, keep it yourself and I stated my opinion about Reach, that's all.

But, I'll test your Halo knowledge to see if you know much about Halo.

[Edited on 08.01.2011 10:46 PM PDT]

  • 08.01.2011 10:34 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?

1. living dead is going to increase your K/D. which is sad how even with the hundred games of it you played it is still low.
Living dead,BTB, and invasion are going to boost your K/Ds more than team slayer,squad battle,etc.

2. yea BTB is easy because i can just sit at the back of a base and snipe all day having my friends cover me.

It is far harder to dao that in a 4v4 or 5v5 game since you are killing the same people over and over again which are going to go for you.

I said objective not invasion. why? because people go into objective and kill people instead of playing.

How about you compare my states to yours? FYI my K/D was 1.60 until i started taking a leadership role in my clan.

  • 08.01.2011 10:37 PM PDT


Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.[/quote]

I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.

[/quote]

Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.[/quote]

So you call "Fairly awesome" godly.
I even said my K/D wasn't good.
Master Chief used what armor lock should have been to survive a fall from orbit.
Both forces had Active Camo systems.
All UNSC forces used a Jetpack in Space ops before.
Cortana used Holograms of the Chief and his team in First Strike to confuse elites.
Drop Shield is a Human bubble shield.
Sprint is how fast a spartan should run.
Evade is a natural elite move, that bungie was just now able to allow players to use.



1. since you were talking about "destroying novas" like it was a daily thing i expected your K/D to atleast be better than mine. and your K/D isn't "fairly awesome", like i said i was disappointed. No, you said your K/D isn't good because of blah blah blah, not "mine K/D isn't good".

2. That is a completely different system and has a completely different function. you clearly don't know more than Rag does.

3. the UNSC only had active camo because the reversed engineered it from the covenant, even then that wasn't until late in the war.

4. Um no she didn't and page number please.

5.the bubble shield looks more human in design anyway, not to mention we don't know who built it since there are conflicting statements.

6. A spartan would run far faster than that.

7. um, my aunts cat can "evade" also



I never said daily, whenever I'm with my friends.
I know the 2 different camos, Photoreactive Paneling.
And the Covenant have shields that act as Camo.
On the Flagship Elite Hunt and kill teams were searching for the Chief, Haverson, johnson, Polaski, and Locklear, so Cortana used holoprojecters to create holograms and electronic ghosts of them to confuse elites.
I win on the Drop Shield.

Spartans can run faster i know, I still win though.

I still win on evade.

Armor Abilities are as much a part of halo as the vehicles.

  • 08.01.2011 10:39 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.[/quote]

I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.

[/quote]

Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.


** you play a crap load of BTB and living dead, so that is going to get your KD up :/ not to mention you have a few objective games also.


Try playing rumble pit and more team slayer/squad slayer.


I checked your GT aswell, your a campaign and firefight farmer. So you can't say crap Mister Iduntwannarankuplegitly.


I boosted campaign merely because i want them to all to onyx with out the ridiculously playing legitimately.

Check my MP states to yours, and let me clarify.

1. I go for challanges, so that last weekly with "beat 80 rounds of firefight" or whatever i was playing all week to get. and any other weekly/challange in general i try to get.

2. you get more credits playing firefight than you do playing MP, so you are stupid if you are a high rank and are not going to play firefight (nice flaw bungie).


You will see that i play MP religiously, i normally stick to rumble pit,team slayer,squad slayer; the gametypes you don't play. and look my K/D is higher than yours (it doesn't count firefight).


  • 08.01.2011 10:42 PM PDT


Posted by: grey101
1. living dead is going to increase your K/D. which is sad how even with the hundred games of it you played it is still low.
Living dead,BTB, and invasion are going to boost your K/Ds more than team slayer,squad battle,etc.

2. yea BTB is easy because i can just sit at the back of a base and snipe all day having my friends cover me.

It is far harder to dao that in a 4v4 or 5v5 game since you are killing the same people over and over again which are going to go for you.

I said objective not invasion. why? because people go into objective and kill people instead of playing.

How about you compare my states to yours? FYI my K/D was 1.60 until i started taking a leadership role in my clan.


I DON'T PLAY IT TO BOOST MY KD.
I play them because Invasion and BTB are most like real Combat engagements in Halo lore. Me and my friends even Have Spartan Service tags and names, for example I'm Justin-S097. My friend is Drew-S091. I digress, I love invasion because it is like a multiplayer Campaign.
If you expect me to believe that the only reason your K/D is lower because you took on leadership, you will have to believe my statements as well they are both true.

  • 08.01.2011 10:45 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.[/quote]

I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.

[/quote]

Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.[/quote]

So you call "Fairly awesome" godly.
I even said my K/D wasn't good.
Master Chief used what armor lock should have been to survive a fall from orbit.
Both forces had Active Camo systems.
All UNSC forces used a Jetpack in Space ops before.
Cortana used Holograms of the Chief and his team in First Strike to confuse elites.
Drop Shield is a Human bubble shield.
Sprint is how fast a spartan should run.
Evade is a natural elite move, that bungie was just now able to allow players to use.



1. since you were talking about "destroying novas" like it was a daily thing i expected your K/D to atleast be better than mine. and your K/D isn't "fairly awesome", like i said i was disappointed. No, you said your K/D isn't good because of blah blah blah, not "mine K/D isn't good".

2. That is a completely different system and has a completely different function. you clearly don't know more than Rag does.

3. the UNSC only had active camo because the reversed engineered it from the covenant, even then that wasn't until late in the war.

4. Um no she didn't and page number please.

5.the bubble shield looks more human in design anyway, not to mention we don't know who built it since there are conflicting statements.

6. A spartan would run far faster than that.

7. um, my aunts cat can "evade" also



I never said daily, whenever I'm with my friends.
I know the 2 different camos, Photoreactive Paneling.
And the Covenant have shields that act as Camo.
On the Flagship Elite Hunt and kill teams were searching for the Chief, Haverson, johnson, Polaski, and Locklear, so Cortana used holoprojecters to create holograms and electronic ghosts of them to confuse elites.
I win on the Drop Shield.

Spartans can run faster i know, I still win though.

I still win on evade.

Armor Abilities are as much a part of halo as the vehicles.



1. so you can only beat novas when playing with your friends? well your K/d supports that. along with the fact you take pride in something like that, a decent player wouldn't be surprised at the fact nor brag about it.

2. I really want to see where you are getting the hologram stuff because i never heard of that.

3. you don't "win" anything.

4. you don't "win" anything.


The point i was saying is anything with a certain body type can roll, and spartans can run much faster than "sprint". you are just glowing with ignorance.

no the -blam!- they are not

  • 08.01.2011 10:45 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3