Bungie Universe
This topic has moved here: Subject: FW: Help Save The Halo 3 Community
  • Subject: FW: Help Save The Halo 3 Community
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: FW: Help Save The Halo 3 Community


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
1. living dead is going to increase your K/D. which is sad how even with the hundred games of it you played it is still low.
Living dead,BTB, and invasion are going to boost your K/Ds more than team slayer,squad battle,etc.

2. yea BTB is easy because i can just sit at the back of a base and snipe all day having my friends cover me.

It is far harder to dao that in a 4v4 or 5v5 game since you are killing the same people over and over again which are going to go for you.

I said objective not invasion. why? because people go into objective and kill people instead of playing.

How about you compare my states to yours? FYI my K/D was 1.60 until i started taking a leadership role in my clan.


I DON'T PLAY IT TO BOOST MY KD.
I play them because Invasion and BTB are most like real Combat engagements in Halo lore. Me and my friends even Have Spartan Service tags and names, for example I'm Justin-S097. My friend is Drew-S091. I digress, I love invasion because it is like a multiplayer Campaign.
If you expect me to believe that the only reason your K/D is lower because you took on leadership, you will have to believe my statements as well they are both true.


Living Dead is also fun because of the survival aspect.

  • 08.01.2011 10:47 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101
1. living dead is going to increase your K/D. which is sad how even with the hundred games of it you played it is still low.
Living dead,BTB, and invasion are going to boost your K/Ds more than team slayer,squad battle,etc.

2. yea BTB is easy because i can just sit at the back of a base and snipe all day having my friends cover me.

It is far harder to dao that in a 4v4 or 5v5 game since you are killing the same people over and over again which are going to go for you.

I said objective not invasion. why? because people go into objective and kill people instead of playing.

How about you compare my states to yours? FYI my K/D was 1.60 until i started taking a leadership role in my clan.


I DON'T PLAY IT TO BOOST MY KD.
I play them because Invasion and BTB are most like real Combat engagements in Halo lore. Me and my friends even Have Spartan Service tags and names, for example I'm Justin-S097. My friend is Drew-S091. I digress, I love invasion because it is like a multiplayer Campaign.
If you expect me to believe that the only reason your K/D is lower because you took on leadership, you will have to believe my statements as well they are both true.


regardless if you do or don't your K/D will still go up from playing that playlist.


OR i could just get my K/D back to 1.60 and send you a file.

  • 08.01.2011 10:48 PM PDT


Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.[/quote]

I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.

[/quote]

Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.[/quote]

So you call "Fairly awesome" godly.
I even said my K/D wasn't good.
Master Chief used what armor lock should have been to survive a fall from orbit.
Both forces had Active Camo systems.
All UNSC forces used a Jetpack in Space ops before.
Cortana used Holograms of the Chief and his team in First Strike to confuse elites.
Drop Shield is a Human bubble shield.
Sprint is how fast a spartan should run.
Evade is a natural elite move, that bungie was just now able to allow players to use.



1. since you were talking about "destroying novas" like it was a daily thing i expected your K/D to atleast be better than mine. and your K/D isn't "fairly awesome", like i said i was disappointed. No, you said your K/D isn't good because of blah blah blah, not "mine K/D isn't good".

2. That is a completely different system and has a completely different function. you clearly don't know more than Rag does.

3. the UNSC only had active camo because the reversed engineered it from the covenant, even then that wasn't until late in the war.

4. Um no she didn't and page number please.

5.the bubble shield looks more human in design anyway, not to mention we don't know who built it since there are conflicting statements.

6. A spartan would run far faster than that.

7. um, my aunts cat can "evade" also



I never said daily, whenever I'm with my friends.
I know the 2 different camos, Photoreactive Paneling.
And the Covenant have shields that act as Camo.
On the Flagship Elite Hunt and kill teams were searching for the Chief, Haverson, johnson, Polaski, and Locklear, so Cortana used holoprojecters to create holograms and electronic ghosts of them to confuse elites.
I win on the Drop Shield.

Spartans can run faster i know, I still win though.

I still win on evade.

Armor Abilities are as much a part of halo as the vehicles.



1. so you can only beat novas when playing with your friends? well your K/d supports that. along with the fact you take pride in something like that, a decent player wouldn't be surprised at the fact nor brag about it.

2. I really want to see where you are getting the hologram stuff because i never heard of that.

3. you don't "win" anything.

4. you don't "win" anything.


The point i was saying is anything with a certain body type can roll, and spartans can run much faster than "sprint". you are just glowing with ignorance.

no the -blam!- they are not


I play bad in the Mornings and Late at Night.
I play good at 11:00 and amazing at 1:00-8:00.
2 to 8 is when my friends get on, we destroy because we are tactical, I'm good alone, but much better with a complete team, Much like you or anybody else.
AND FOR GODS SAKE, the Hologram stuff is in HALO: FIRST STRIKE. If you knew anything about that novel, you would know what i was talking about.

  • 08.01.2011 10:53 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117
Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.[/quote]

I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.

[/quote]

Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.[/quote]

So you call "Fairly awesome" godly.
I even said my K/D wasn't good.
Master Chief used what armor lock should have been to survive a fall from orbit.
Both forces had Active Camo systems.
All UNSC forces used a Jetpack in Space ops before.
Cortana used Holograms of the Chief and his team in First Strike to confuse elites.
Drop Shield is a Human bubble shield.
Sprint is how fast a spartan should run.
Evade is a natural elite move, that bungie was just now able to allow players to use. [/quote]


1. since you were talking about "destroying novas" like it was a daily thing i expected your K/D to atleast be better than mine. and your K/D isn't "fairly awesome", like i said i was disappointed. No, you said your K/D isn't good because of blah blah blah, not "mine K/D isn't good".

2. That is a completely different system and has a completely different function. you clearly don't know more than Rag does.

3. the UNSC only had active camo because the reversed engineered it from the covenant, even then that wasn't until late in the war.

4. Um no she didn't and page number please.

5.the bubble shield looks more human in design anyway, not to mention we don't know who built it since there are conflicting statements.

6. A spartan would run far faster than that.

7. um, my aunts cat can "evade" also

[/quote]

I never said daily, whenever I'm with my friends.
I know the 2 different camos, Photoreactive Paneling.
And the Covenant have shields that act as Camo.
On the Flagship Elite Hunt and kill teams were searching for the Chief, Haverson, johnson, Polaski, and Locklear, so Cortana used holoprojecters to create holograms and electronic ghosts of them to confuse elites.
I win on the Drop Shield.

Spartans can run faster i know, I still win though.

I still win on evade.

Armor Abilities are as much a part of halo as the vehicles.[/quote]


1. so you can only beat novas when playing with your friends? well your K/d supports that. along with the fact you take pride in something like that, a decent player wouldn't be surprised at the fact nor brag about it.

2. I really want to see where you are getting the hologram stuff because i never heard of that.

3. you don't "win" anything.

4. you don't "win" anything.


The point i was saying is anything with a certain body type can roll, and spartans can run much faster than "sprint". you are just glowing with ignorance.

no the -blam!- they are not


I play bad in the Mornings and Late at Night.
I play good at 11:00 and amazing at 1:00-8:00.
2 to 8 is when my friends get on, we destroy because we are tactical, I'm good alone, but much better with a complete team, Much like you or anybody else.
AND FOR GODS SAKE, the Hologram stuff is in HALO: FIRST STRIKE. If you knew anything about that novel, you would know what i was talking about.


1. why is it that you keep making up excuses? i don't care how you really play it is just the fact you tried acting like something you clearly aren't.

2. i am better alone because i don;t need to talk, hence what i said earlier.

3. i have read that book twice and don't remember anything like it. I have it right here, can you give me a page number or something so i can re-read it? or are you using halopedia?

  • 08.01.2011 10:56 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Member of Bungie.net for nearly three years, still continuing!

Enjoy what you have and live on.

My gamertag is Elder Bias

ShadowSpy117

All right, I want to test your Halo knowledge before accepting you as Halo fan.

All right, here's three questions that I will tell you to test your Halo knowledge.

Here's two rules you must follow:

1.) No using of Halopedian, Halo Nation, etc because it is not acceptable sources. Only hard sources are permitted.

2.) Your answer must included with quote of book and page number plus name of the book.

---------------------------------------------

Question 1:

When did Forerunner-Human War started on date? How long did the Forerunner-Human War last? Why it did start? If so, state reasons and explain each reasons. How it did end? What it was result for Humans? Forerunners?

Question 2:

Is Forerunners good? After the Forerunner-Human War ended, what it has changed the views on the Forerunners?

Question 3:

How did Forerunners manage to defeat Precursors, being Transsisent beings, Technologically Tier 0 that is superior to Forerunners?

So, if you can answer those questions without using Halopedian or wikipedia and using only hard sources, providing page numbers, then I'll accept you as Halo fan.

[Edited on 08.01.2011 11:00 PM PDT]

  • 08.01.2011 10:58 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: raganok99
ShadowSpy117

All right, I want to test your Halo knowledge before accepting you as Halo fan.

All right, here's three questions that I will tell you to test your Halo knowledge.

Here's two rules you must follow:

1.) No using of Halopedian, Halo Nation, etc because it is not acceptable sources. Only hard sources are permitted.

2.) Your answer must included with quote of book and page number plus name of the book.

---------------------------------------------

Question 1:

When did Forerunner-Human War started on date? How long did the Forerunner-Human War last? Why it did start? If so, state reasons and explain each reasons. How it did end? What it was result for Humans? Forerunners?

Question 2:

Is Forerunners good? After the Forerunner-Human War ended, what it has changed the views on the Forerunners?

Question 3:

How did Forerunners manage to defeat Precursors, being Transsisent beings, Technologically Tier 0 that is superior to Forerunners?

So, if you can answer those questions without using Halopedian or wikipedia and using only hard sources, providing page numbers, then I'll accept you as Halo fan.


Thats easy

  • 08.01.2011 11:01 PM PDT


Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117
Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.[/quote]

I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.

[/quote]

Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.[/quote]

So you call "Fairly awesome" godly.
I even said my K/D wasn't good.
Master Chief used what armor lock should have been to survive a fall from orbit.
Both forces had Active Camo systems.
All UNSC forces used a Jetpack in Space ops before.
Cortana used Holograms of the Chief and his team in First Strike to confuse elites.
Drop Shield is a Human bubble shield.
Sprint is how fast a spartan should run.
Evade is a natural elite move, that bungie was just now able to allow players to use. [/quote]


1. since you were talking about "destroying novas" like it was a daily thing i expected your K/D to atleast be better than mine. and your K/D isn't "fairly awesome", like i said i was disappointed. No, you said your K/D isn't good because of blah blah blah, not "mine K/D isn't good".

2. That is a completely different system and has a completely different function. you clearly don't know more than Rag does.

3. the UNSC only had active camo because the reversed engineered it from the covenant, even then that wasn't until late in the war.

4. Um no she didn't and page number please.

5.the bubble shield looks more human in design anyway, not to mention we don't know who built it since there are conflicting statements.

6. A spartan would run far faster than that.

7. um, my aunts cat can "evade" also

[/quote]

I never said daily, whenever I'm with my friends.
I know the 2 different camos, Photoreactive Paneling.
And the Covenant have shields that act as Camo.
On the Flagship Elite Hunt and kill teams were searching for the Chief, Haverson, johnson, Polaski, and Locklear, so Cortana used holoprojecters to create holograms and electronic ghosts of them to confuse elites.
I win on the Drop Shield.

Spartans can run faster i know, I still win though.

I still win on evade.

Armor Abilities are as much a part of halo as the vehicles.[/quote]


1. so you can only beat novas when playing with your friends? well your K/d supports that. along with the fact you take pride in something like that, a decent player wouldn't be surprised at the fact nor brag about it.

2. I really want to see where you are getting the hologram stuff because i never heard of that.

3. you don't "win" anything.

4. you don't "win" anything.


The point i was saying is anything with a certain body type can roll, and spartans can run much faster than "sprint". you are just glowing with ignorance.

no the -blam!- they are not


I play bad in the Mornings and Late at Night.
I play good at 11:00 and amazing at 1:00-8:00.
2 to 8 is when my friends get on, we destroy because we are tactical, I'm good alone, but much better with a complete team, Much like you or anybody else.
AND FOR GODS SAKE, the Hologram stuff is in HALO: FIRST STRIKE. If you knew anything about that novel, you would know what i was talking about.


1. why is it that you keep making up excuses? i don't care how you really play it is just the fact you tried acting like something you clearly aren't.

2. i am better alone because i don;t need to talk, hence what i said earlier.

3. i have read that book twice and don't remember anything like it. I have it right here, can you give me a page number or something so i can re-read it? or are you using halopedia?


I read all the novels over the course of the year for every year since I got them about 2 or 3 years ago. I was reading FS yesterday. It was shortly before they got to the bridge and fought that elite. Just go read it.

  • 08.01.2011 11:01 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Halo 3 sucks almost as reach does and it needs to die.

not to mention wrong forum, why are you playing a game if you can't read?[/quote]

Alright, that's it!
You're the most cynical piece of wrong I've ever encountered.
If you don't like Halo 3 or Reach, you aren't even a Halo fan.
I don't like Halo 3 multiplayer, because kill times were about as fast as CoD.
But Halo: Reach has my favorite Multiplayer experience.
I hate the ranking system, but love buying armor, because it is so rewarding.
HR Kill times were just right to me. You don't feel like a week pushover in Reach MP. I'm fairly awesome at Reach. And you'll say anybody can be awesome at Reach. Then what about those kids I see everyday, that I destroy who are over Noble.
They may be a good shot, but have no skill.
Now, back on topic.
Halo: CEA is coming out, so you'll have you're original Halo back soon.
[/quote]

1. Halo 3 sucks because IRIS was a massive hype yet the game didn't surpass due to a change in development. which is also the reason halo uprising changed plots. Not to mention the ark was destroyed after a few missions despite how important it was.

The BR killed multiplayer along with the messed up ranking system. The you had an extreme amount of people that exploited the game making it un-fun.


2. Microsoft said ti themselves that reach strayed form halo. I don't mid that MC wasn't there, but the story that was introduced wasn't good. I am against FS being a game but they started touching stuff that didn't need to be touched.

3. Reach MP is far too easy and casual, which is why there is literately no clan action for reach or atleast no elite clans.

4. Most of the higher ranks are bad due to playing Firefight and boosting, same as halo 3. thought i would like to check you GT to see if you are even good as you claim.

5. And i am basing my opinions off the campaigns, i play halo for the story.

6. i like every halo game except 3 and Reach.[/quote]

I hate BR too. GT: xXShadowSpy11Xx, I must warn you, my K/D is not as good as it would be If I had cared about it before the rank of Brigadier, I only recently got enlightened on how this shows how good you are. But my K/D improves everyday that I play MM with my team of Friends.

Halo 3 and Reach had a compelling story, the only way Reach broke Canon was that the POA was on the ground.

You may judge a game just by the Campaign, but not everybody does.

Halo: Reach is just as much Halo as any other Halo game.

I love every Halo game. Halo is not just a game, it is my home.

[/quote]

Your K/D isn't godly as you tried to make it seem.

the game should only be based by the game since it will outlast multiplayer. Call of duty gets 8-9s by IGN based off MP alone and it is horrible.


yea, halo 3 would have been better if the plot wasn't rushed. the entire game was leading up to the ark which was destroyed.


Halo reach geared up towards the unnecessary forerunner artifact that was also destroyed, and it stated the humans KNEW something was important from the sigma crystal which wasn't the case at all. Thats all i am really going to say.


Armor abilities aren't halo whatsoever, bungie spent more time on them than vehicles which defined halo back in the day.[/quote]

So you call "Fairly awesome" godly.
I even said my K/D wasn't good.
Master Chief used what armor lock should have been to survive a fall from orbit.
Both forces had Active Camo systems.
All UNSC forces used a Jetpack in Space ops before.
Cortana used Holograms of the Chief and his team in First Strike to confuse elites.
Drop Shield is a Human bubble shield.
Sprint is how fast a spartan should run.
Evade is a natural elite move, that bungie was just now able to allow players to use. [/quote]


1. since you were talking about "destroying novas" like it was a daily thing i expected your K/D to atleast be better than mine. and your K/D isn't "fairly awesome", like i said i was disappointed. No, you said your K/D isn't good because of blah blah blah, not "mine K/D isn't good".

2. That is a completely different system and has a completely different function. you clearly don't know more than Rag does.

3. the UNSC only had active camo because the reversed engineered it from the covenant, even then that wasn't until late in the war.

4. Um no she didn't and page number please.

5.the bubble shield looks more human in design anyway, not to mention we don't know who built it since there are conflicting statements.

6. A spartan would run far faster than that.

7. um, my aunts cat can "evade" also

[/quote]

I never said daily, whenever I'm with my friends.
I know the 2 different camos, Photoreactive Paneling.
And the Covenant have shields that act as Camo.
On the Flagship Elite Hunt and kill teams were searching for the Chief, Haverson, johnson, Polaski, and Locklear, so Cortana used holoprojecters to create holograms and electronic ghosts of them to confuse elites.
I win on the Drop Shield.

Spartans can run faster i know, I still win though.

I still win on evade.

Armor Abilities are as much a part of halo as the vehicles.[/quote]


1. so you can only beat novas when playing with your friends? well your K/d supports that. along with the fact you take pride in something like that, a decent player wouldn't be surprised at the fact nor brag about it.

2. I really want to see where you are getting the hologram stuff because i never heard of that.

3. you don't "win" anything.

4. you don't "win" anything.


The point i was saying is anything with a certain body type can roll, and spartans can run much faster than "sprint". you are just glowing with ignorance.

no the -blam!- they are not[/quote]

I play bad in the Mornings and Late at Night.
I play good at 11:00 and amazing at 1:00-8:00.
2 to 8 is when my friends get on, we destroy because we are tactical, I'm good alone, but much better with a complete team, Much like you or anybody else.
AND FOR GODS SAKE, the Hologram stuff is in HALO: FIRST STRIKE. If you knew anything about that novel, you would know what i was talking about.[/quote]

1. why is it that you keep making up excuses? i don't care how you really play it is just the fact you tried acting like something you clearly aren't.

2. i am better alone because i don;t need to talk, hence what i said earlier.

3. i have read that book twice and don't remember anything like it. I have it right here, can you give me a page number or something so i can re-read it? or are you using halopedia?[/quote]

I read all the novels over the course of the year for every year since I got them about 2 or 3 years ago. I was reading FS yesterday. It was shortly before they got to the bridge and fought that elite. Just go read it.


the original FS page 66

" she replicated several ghost signals to confuse the enemy"

she was talking about radio signals not holograms :/

  • 08.01.2011 11:06 PM PDT


Posted by: raganok99
ShadowSpy117

All right, I want to test your Halo knowledge before accepting you as Halo fan.

All right, here's three questions that I will tell you to test your Halo knowledge.

Here's two rules you must follow:

1.) No using of Halopedian, Halo Nation, etc because it is not acceptable sources. Only hard sources are permitted.

2.) Your answer must included with quote of book and page number plus name of the book.

---------------------------------------------

Question 1:

When did Forerunner-Human War started on date? How long did the Forerunner-Human War last? Why it did start? If so, state reasons and explain each reasons. How it did end? What it was result for Humans? Forerunners?

Question 2:

Is Forerunners good? After the Forerunner-Human War ended, what it has changed the views on the Forerunners?

Question 3:

How did Forerunners manage to defeat Precursors, being Transsisent beings, Technologically Tier 0 that is superior to Forerunners?

So, if you can answer those questions without using Halopedian or wikipedia and using only hard sources, providing page numbers, then I'll accept you as Halo fan.


Q#1:
I don't the exact dates, but I know how it started.
Humans were forcibly colonizing worlds attacking whatever races were on them due to the need for New Colonies they were also a threat to the forerunners, because they were being attacked by the flood that had taken over the Pheru that then infected humans and others. Once they had defeated the Flood, the San-Shyuum betrayed them and the forerunners kicked their asses back to the literal Stone age.
Q#2:
It is a matter of opinion. They contradict themselves, by destroying other races that are destroying other races. "The Needs of the Many, Outweigh the Needs of the Few" and blah blahblah. They definitely are not Good. They are in the Gray Area.
Q#3:
They destroyed the stars that they lived in by making them go super nova. almost killing themselves in the process.

  • 08.01.2011 11:10 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117


Q#3:
They destroyed the stars that they lived in by making them go super nova. almost killing themselves in the process.


um no, what fan fic did you read?

and how can you not know how long the war lasted?

[Edited on 08.01.2011 11:13 PM PDT]

  • 08.01.2011 11:12 PM PDT


Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117


Q#3:
They destroyed the stars that they lived in by making them go super nova. almost killing themselves in the process.


um no, what fan fic did you read?

and how can you not know how long the war lasted?


Precursors lived inside stars. Atleast that's what I heard.
Forerunner must have teleported Iron to the core of the star, instantaneously killing the star. Boom Supernova.

  • 08.01.2011 11:16 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117


Q#3:
They destroyed the stars that they lived in by making them go super nova. almost killing themselves in the process.


um no, what fan fic did you read?

and how can you not know how long the war lasted?


Precursors lived inside stars. Atleast that's what I heard.
Forerunner must have teleported Iron to the core of the star, instantaneously killing the star. Boom Supernova.


I am confused.

you posted info that you should only know from cryptum yet what you are saying about the precursors was never said or implied in cryptum.

so you clearly don't have that book

  • 08.01.2011 11:18 PM PDT


Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117


Q#3:
They destroyed the stars that they lived in by making them go super nova. almost killing themselves in the process.


um no, what fan fic did you read?

and how can you not know how long the war lasted?


Precursors lived inside stars. Atleast that's what I heard.
Forerunner must have teleported Iron to the core of the star, instantaneously killing the star. Boom Supernova.


I am confused.

you posted info that you should only know from cryptum yet what you are saying about the precursors was never said or implied in cryptum.

so you clearly don't have that book


I borrowed the book. Didn't have time to read it over again.

I also don't have time to argue with Forum Demons.

  • 08.01.2011 11:20 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: ShadowSpy117
Posted by: ShadowSpy117


Q#3:
They destroyed the stars that they lived in by making them go super nova. almost killing themselves in the process.[/quote]

um no, what fan fic did you read?

and how can you not know how long the war lasted?[/quote]

Precursors lived inside stars. Atleast that's what I heard.
Forerunner must have teleported Iron to the core of the star, instantaneously killing the star. Boom Supernova.[/quote]

I am confused.

you posted info that you should only know from cryptum yet what you are saying about the precursors was never said or implied in cryptum.

so you clearly don't have that book


I borrowed the book. Didn't have time to read it over again.

I also don't have time to argue with Forum Demons.


You are a horrible liar, anybody that read the book once would know the questions Rag asked.

you are clearly forfeiting because we called your bluff.

  • 08.01.2011 11:21 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Member of Bungie.net for nearly three years, still continuing!

Enjoy what you have and live on.

My gamertag is Elder Bias


Posted by: ShadowSpy117

Posted by: grey101

Posted by: ShadowSpy117


Q#3:
They destroyed the stars that they lived in by making them go super nova. almost killing themselves in the process.


um no, what fan fic did you read?

and how can you not know how long the war lasted?


Precursors lived inside stars. Atleast that's what I heard.
Forerunner must have teleported Iron to the core of the star, instantaneously killing the star. Boom Supernova.


LOL, wrong.

In Cryptum, it never stated that Precursors lived in the stars. Therefore, you do not have Cryptum. And, your answers on question 3 is wrong and question 1 is partially wrong as well.

Question 1's answer is that war lasted 50 years due to human stronghold, Chakum Hakkar had superior ODPs that sports weapons that Forerunners had no defense and it dragged on for fifty years until Forerunners finally beat Humans. And prophets never betrayed Humans, they were defeated as well because Forerunners overwhelmed prophets. It started in 10,350 years before Cryptum started.


So, as claiming that borrowed book is pathetic excuse, any folk who read the book knows answers to my question. You are terrible lair, and are not Halo fan.

[Edited on 08.02.2011 12:47 AM PDT]

  • 08.01.2011 11:22 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Do not waste your tears, I was not born to watch the world grow dim. Life is not measured in years, but by the deeds of men.

Posted by: goldhawk
We should know better, because we are better.

Just double checking, but the HF war occurred 10350 years before Halo's activation (give or take a few years)?

  • 08.01.2011 11:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: Xd00999
Just double checking, but the HF war occurred 10350 years before Halo's activation (give or take a few years)?

mmmmmmhhmmmmm

o0o and we are making coups about being "universe haters and demons" now,lol

  • 08.01.2011 11:30 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Believe

My gametag is not sparda34b, it was an error, gamertag is Sparda3b.

This is the wrong forum but I will agree that Halo 3 was awesome, probably my favorite and I do intend to play that day.

  • 08.02.2011 12:20 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Believe

My gametag is not sparda34b, it was an error, gamertag is Sparda3b.

I own all the books and stuff including Cryptum but I don't remember them explaining how the Forerunner beat the Precursors in Cryptum, can you provide a page or do you not have the book on hand?

[Edited on 08.02.2011 12:42 AM PDT]

  • 08.02.2011 12:41 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: Sparda3b
I own all the books and stuff including Cryptum but I don't remember them explaining how the Forerunner beat the Precursors in Cryptum, can you provide a page or do you not have the book on hand?


you don't remember because it was never said in the book or anywhere else

  • 08.02.2011 12:46 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Believe

My gametag is not sparda34b, it was an error, gamertag is Sparda3b.

Oh, I thought raganok99 had it listed as one of the answers, I think he edited it out but whatever, I could be mistaken.

  • 08.02.2011 1:04 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: Sparda3b
Oh, I thought raganok99 had it listed as one of the answers, I think he edited it out but whatever, I could be mistaken.


nope.

nothing was said about how the precursors and forerunners fought, period.

it is just stuff people write in fan fics they want to be true

  • 08.02.2011 1:05 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Believe

My gametag is not sparda34b, it was an error, gamertag is Sparda3b.

When I said mistaken I meant about what he edited on his post, what you are saying is what I thought to be true to begin with(that there were no details on the war other then it happened).

[Edited on 08.02.2011 1:08 AM PDT]

  • 08.02.2011 1:07 AM PDT

Let your anger be as a monkey in a piñata... hiding amongst the candy... hoping the kids don't break through with the stick!

i am sad now, i like all the halos except Halo: Wars, and i read and loved the books that i read (fall of reach, the flood, first strike) and because i like halo reach and halo 3 it means im not a fan?

  • 08.02.2011 1:13 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: jackopie123
i am sad now, i like all the halos except Halo: Wars, and i read and loved the books that i read (fall of reach, the flood, first strike) and because i like halo reach and halo 3 it means im not a fan?


did you dislike halo wars because of the game or story?

  • 08.02.2011 1:14 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3