- ROBERTO jh
- |
- Fabled Heroic Member
Posted by: MisterBraz
Posted by: JFMK2
Posted by: MisterBraz
Posted by: MadGamer991
Whoever thinks that a spartan is better than an elite is wrong
if you are wondering why elites are better here is the reason elites have stronger shields and regenerate no matter how low of health and they are also faster than Spartans
Spartans. Why? An 'average' Spartan like Master Chief has killed tons of them, and has taken down 2 or 3 veteran Elites at once in combat, has bested them in hand-to-hand, even when odds are stacked in the Elites' favor, and has outsmarted/outwitted them. From my undersanding, the Spartans' armor is superior, their strength and agility is roughly equal, as well as their training, and Spartans are faster. Elites have superior tech, and have even been bested by Marines. Spartans get my vote.Bested by marines? Now, I've never read the books, so you've got me curious. Regarding, skill, and overall combat proficiency, how would an average UNSC footsoldier stack up against an Elite?
OT: Spartans. I feel that others have supplied adequate reasoning for my choice.
Marines have killed Elites, usually in groups, though, and on occasion.
The only instance I remember off the top of my head is when a Marine used a gauss turret to blow one in half in Evolutions.
OT: I'd say the Elites are physically equal to the SIIs, but the IIs usually have the advantage of being on defense, being spread out, superior armor technology (such as the HUD, com-channels and such) and possibly being more intelligent. Elites are tactical geniuses, but that usually applies to higher ranking warriors. They likely have a higher average IQ then humans, but Spartans were unique.
However in 1v1 matches, it has been shown time and time again Spartans struggle with them.