- CrazzySnipe55
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
Posted by: SEAL Sniper 9
Posted by: MURDUR 587
[quote]Posted by: SEAL Sniper 9
You think Halo: Reach doesn't have big flaws?
Sure they bent some book canon, but that doesn't make the story or the game bad, they had to do it to make the game fun and to make it work. And what if The Fall of Reach never existed?
After distorted canon, it can make the game not fun. I know a few, and I'm sure there's others, who feel the same way. How can you enjoy something when you know it doesn't follow what's already been established? Apart from this, the story that they did replace is just...terrible. It has one-dimensional characters who aren't likable and the only one who showed any signs of hope was Jorge who died early on. There wasn't any character development or overall characters like they had in ODST. You can see all my reasons for disliking the campaign in the thread I linked. I'm not going to keep rambling on about it. But, one last thing, was it just me or was Noble Team having a "Who can die in the most epic way contest!"
The fact is most people who played the game did NOT read the book and so distorted canon, for the majority of Reach gamers, did not affect their playing experience at all...