- HeyBlade789
- |
- Exalted Mythic Member
Hello! I'm Bunie.net's resident medical student (hell i'm sure there are more but I'm the only one who openly declares it!) I love my emblem, and I am periodically active.
I have a Twitter
Posted by: SEAL Sniper 9
Posted by: HeyBlade789
Posted by: SEAL Sniper 9
Posted by: MURDUR 587
Posted by: SEAL Sniper 9
Errrm...you're not understanding. Go read the thread I posted earlier. It explains the flaws of Reach.Not it doesn't, it just says "I didn't like this, this, this and this. I preferred this in this Halo and blah blah blah", you didn't state any real flaws within the game, simply things that were not to your liking.
Okay, then. Read Fall of Reach, then play the Reach campaign. It's pretty obvious.
Would the a game based on the Fall of Reach be that good? nope.
Might of been good, might've been bad. Then, they shouldn't have made Reach, in the first place, if it would've been so bad to use the book instead of just disregarding the canon completely and replacing it with something terrible.
Tha Fall of Reach is one of the pivotal moments of the Halo universe, it makes sense Bungie would want to explore it.