Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: My opinion on why halo 3 is better the reach and why reach is bad
  • Subject: My opinion on why halo 3 is better the reach and why reach is bad
Subject: My opinion on why halo 3 is better the reach and why reach is bad

halo 3 i remember playing this right when i got home from school and with my buddies and trying to surpass their ranks now thats one problem with reach its xp and ranking its means nothing all it says is that you play all day like black ops xp system with the challenges but instead its commendations this makes it filled with wannabe halo tryhards on the other hand for halo 3 xp is really earned by winning wich makes it more difficult but makes you want more and it really feels earned from that aspect of the game unlike reach where now teamwoork is killed and is mostly about kills not teamwork also they made the campaign feel like a chore and just wasnt as fun as the halo 3 or odst it just felt like a black ops story with unbalibavle charcters that die very disapointily!oh and im not saying halo reach was horrible or bad just that it didnt live up to the hype!!!

[Edited on 08.07.2011 6:19 PM PDT]

  • 08.07.2011 6:19 PM PDT

haloz rach even smeellz liake poop

  • 08.07.2011 6:34 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Cpt Deluxable
oh and im not saying halo reach was horrible or bad just that it didnt live up to the hype!!!


You stated in the title that Reach is bad.

  • 08.07.2011 6:49 PM PDT

"War is the science of destruction."


Posted by: Cpt Deluxable
haloz rach even smeellz liake poop


You spelled one right word out of 6 words, 1/6. Did you fail spelling class or something? I also think Reach is better than Halo 3, because of forge and firefight.

  • 08.07.2011 7:32 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Hayabusam60

Posted by: Cpt Deluxable
haloz rach even smeellz liake poop


I also think Reach is better than Halo 3, because of forge and firefight.


okay.

  • 08.07.2011 7:43 PM PDT

Vengeance only leads to an ongoing cycle of hatred.

My opinion.

  • 08.07.2011 8:09 PM PDT

Ok first off, that is just some horrible grammar. Ever heard of a period? It's not just for girls.

Second of all, never ever compare Reach to that -blam!- disgrace that is COD ever. There is a cap for how many EXP you can get in one day and the rewards are much better than a new gun or a new skin for a gun you don't even use. And the -blam!- you mean "teamwoork is killed". What does that even mean? The amount of points you get after each game depends on how well you played, not whether you win or lose, which, in my opinion makes the game more realistic in terms of levels of success after each game. The campaign was amazing and, if you knew the story of Reach, wouldn't be a chore knowing that you were fighting a lost battle, so you might as well make the most of it. The Reach campaign actually resembles that of the Halo 1 campaign in a way.

Lastly, Reach did live up to its hype. Bungie told you exactly what you were getting, not like Activision/Infinity Ward who told you that you'd be amazed at the same old crap.

tl;dr OP, you are a -blam!- idiot.

  • 08.07.2011 8:30 PM PDT

I'm fat, bro. You jelly?

Halo 3 got kind of boring after a while. But Reach is just frustrating as hell. I like how Bungie tried new things, which is good, but the new things suck. And the maps in reach... uncomparable to 3. I loved 3's maps.... Sandtrap... Last Resort... Guardian... all of them very unique in their setting.

  • 08.07.2011 8:34 PM PDT
  • gamertag: revayy
  • user homepage:

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrgrgergrg

NVM

[Edited on 08.07.2011 9:21 PM PDT]

  • 08.07.2011 9:18 PM PDT

I run Skirmish!!!

yeah of course halo 3 is better, but im more impressed with how you did not use 1 period in that whole rant of yours.

  • 08.08.2011 12:30 AM PDT