- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Member of Bungie.net for nearly three years, still continuing!
Enjoy what you have and live on.
My gamertag is Elder Bias
Posted by: anish panchalin
Posted by: raganok99
Posted by: Dark Shinobi 93
Have you ever made a game? it isn't that easy.
So you are willing to accept 343i's lazy work in Halo 4? How disappointing. Like I said, adding UNSC or Covenant that makes no sense to be in Halo 4 promotes bad story writing ergo, storyline will be bad. Also, that's reason why they have three year development cycle- they can develop new original storyline, weapons, enemies. I think you never bothered to study in game design/story writing/engineering/programming.
Why anybody can't understand that it is centered at John's destiny instead of UNSC or Covenant's destiny? This planet is FORERUNNER, as Mendicant Bias sent John to Forerunners as his atonement to sins. So it's highly likely that he sent him to Forerunner planet that every species (except Flood, possibly Precursors and Forerunners) does not know about this planet.
Making a Halo 4 similar to Cryptum promotes good storyline, new experience, etc.
I'm sure you're right and it is centred aound John's destiny but it also concerns the whole galaxy's destiny. If I remember correctly the H4 page on halo.xbox.com says something about an ancient evil that threatens the entire galaxy, not just john's life.
Yes, I know. But it doesn't make that UNSC/ex-Covenant being at Halo 4. I can guarantee that they may appear at end of Halo 5. So I don't know why they still argue that UNSC/Covenant should be at Halo 4 because "they can't adapt" the new changes. We are WILLING to accept to play a game without UNSC/Covenant for Forerunners, Precursors and Flood. "Ancient Evil" can be meant as Precursors or Flood.