- Batzter
- |
- Exalted Mythic Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: Duardo
1. You assume it's a ban when it may only be a warning.
2. I'm not going to risk my information or anyone else's by taking a chance when a link looks suspicious when "it might be perfectly fine."
3. There is no ban in the OP's history that suggests the situation he described ever happened.
Posted by: Batzter
Posted by: Duardo
Posted by: Recon Number 54
I am not required nor inclined to vet any link. If it looks shady, then I will ban accordingly.It's pretty sad to read that a ban is your first and seemingly only approach to a link that might be perfectly fine.1. I'm not assuming anything, it was a response to "I will ban accordingly". I don't see how there can be a scale from warning to ban when we're discussing links you havent checked. Is somewhat shady a warning and beyond shady a permaban?
2. Oh my mistake, I forgot that the edit button is for funny edits of fellow moderator posts.
3. I'm not discussing the OP.