Bungie.net Community
This topic has moved here: Subject: The most retarded rule ever...
  • Subject: The most retarded rule ever...
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: The most retarded rule ever...

Bungie controls all. You have no rights. No moderator is going to check every link to see if it is safe and not bad.

  • 09.06.2011 10:09 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Talk to the Soul | ~B.B. | Know Your Duardo |  | Hero | ISFJ | 77135 | 94371

"It's not who I am underneath, but what I do that defines me."


Posted by: Recon Number 54
I am not required nor inclined to vet any link. If it looks shady, then I will ban accordingly.

  • 09.06.2011 10:39 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Duardo

Posted by: Recon Number 54
I am not required nor inclined to vet any link. If it looks shady, then I will ban accordingly.
It's pretty sad to read that a ban is your first and seemingly only approach to a link that might be perfectly fine.

[Edited on 09.06.2011 10:43 AM PDT]

  • 09.06.2011 10:41 AM PDT

"You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space." -Johnny Cash

Well the link might've been safe, but it all depends on what it contains and what the url is listed as.

  • 09.06.2011 10:56 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Talk to the Soul | ~B.B. | Know Your Duardo |  | Hero | ISFJ | 77135 | 94371

"It's not who I am underneath, but what I do that defines me."

1. You assume it's a ban when it may only be a warning.
2. I'm not going to risk my information or anyone else's by taking a chance when a link looks suspicious when it might be perfectly fine.
3. There is no ban in the OP's history that suggests the situation he described ever happened.
Posted by: Batzter

Posted by: Duardo

Posted by: Recon Number 54
I am not required nor inclined to vet any link. If it looks shady, then I will ban accordingly.
It's pretty sad to read that a ban is your first and seemingly only approach to a link that might be perfectly fine.


[Edited on 09.06.2011 11:08 AM PDT]

  • 09.06.2011 11:05 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Duardo
1. You assume it's a ban when it may only be a warning.
2. I'm not going to risk my information or anyone else's by taking a chance when a link looks suspicious when "it might be perfectly fine."
3. There is no ban in the OP's history that suggests the situation he described ever happened.
Posted by: Batzter

Posted by: Duardo

Posted by: Recon Number 54
I am not required nor inclined to vet any link. If it looks shady, then I will ban accordingly.
It's pretty sad to read that a ban is your first and seemingly only approach to a link that might be perfectly fine.
1. I'm not assuming anything, it was a response to "I will ban accordingly". I don't see how there can be a scale from warning to ban when we're discussing links you havent checked. Is somewhat shady a warning and beyond shady a permaban?
2. Oh my mistake, I forgot that the edit button is for funny edits of fellow moderator posts.
3. I'm not discussing the OP.

  • 09.06.2011 11:18 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2