Posted by: ctjl96
Well, why would they? What are you trying to prove? What are you hoping to achieve?
Posted by: burritosenior
but they shouldn't need to.Why?Why'd you make me read your post without knowing whom you were replying to, then look at the quote, then have to go BACK to read your post in content? That makes me sad.
:,(
They would need to because it's mandatory to make threads in that forum. They'd either do it or they wouldn't. I'm not trying to prove anything. What this would achieve is wasting the time of the asshats while providing minimum-to-no disruption for regular members (who would only need to link a single gamertag as opposed to asshats doing it dozens of times).
Posted by: Nedus
Halo will always be associated with Bungie, and there should be a place to discuss it here, no matter how hidden it may be in submenus. I can't think of any reason to make people jump through hoops to discuss it.Linking a gamertag is hardly 'jumping through hoops.' It's something a majority of people making threads in those forums have already done for one.
Yes there should be a place to discuss Halo here. I'm not suggesting getting rid of forums. In fact, I'm suggesting cleaning them up (shoot it's already rare enough that a mod goes into the Halo 3 or ODST forum [and no not because of advertisements in the latter, which are allowed]).
Posted by: ctjl96
New members without 'tags wouldn't be allowed to post in certain forums. What upside is there?What new member is going to come here without a linked gamertag to discuss a game they don't have a gamertag to? And how big of a hassle it is to make and link a gamertag even on the incredibly rare occasion that someone doesn't have one already? Really... you're sort of arguing nothingness here.
My first post explains the upside, and I have done so in a couple posts since. I'd advise reading through those first, then asking again if you're still confused.
:)