- ROBERTO jh
- |
- Fabled Heroic Member
Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
So Roberto, in the same sense, tell us why the UNSC and Covenant can be in halo 4 using those references?
Raganok has a point, based off what information there is, and going with the theory of halo 4 being not long after halo 3, UNSC being there is simply unlikely.
Please read my posts, please. It'll make life so much easier. I specifically said "I am not advocating either side." I have no opinion on the matter. Both sides have evidence, yours being the ass kicking both sides took and are therefore not likely to be going anywhere soon, the others' being the lost ship Everest, Cole and his girlfriend being near enough to hear the distress beacon to come find them.
And again, to your second line, we have literally nothing as to detail when or where we are in Halo 4. All "evidence" cannot be taken without a huge grain of salt. It is also all as good as the other guy's, so this constant back and forth nerd rage is no more then that: pointless bickering. I haven't seen a new argument either for or against the UNSC presence since the "why not" was written, only more examples of "well, the Everest!" followed by "read the why not!"
The main reason I called out the people siding with "not" was because A) the argument for why not is pure and utter speculation based entirely on guess work (to be fair, so is the "why yes") B) it does not explain how the Everest can not be there and C) they just happened to be the dominant people on this particular thread.
But by no means am I choosing a side.