- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: Nareth
Before people ask how I figure that, every person I've had the Halo 3 or Reach argument with someone they call me a noob and claim I have no skill at the game. All because I proved them wrong. And while I'm on the subject of skill, Reach requires no skill while Halo 3 does. The better game obviously has an actual challenge instead of just giving you the rank you probably don't deserve.
I remember I got in an argument with a friend of a friend over H3 vs Reach. He was talking about how I suck with the DMR (even though he can't even keep a positive K/D....), about how Reach was newer and more realistic (as if that matters at -blam!- all), and about how it takes more skill because of bloom. No joke.
He also said Halo 3 sucked because you had to strafe, and he said strafing took no skill and was unrealistic <_<
Also, when I told him the DMR was hitscan, he said he didn't believe me, and told me to show him proof.
If he represents the average Reach fan, I have no idea how I can take any of them seriously.