- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Poll: Which rank system should Halo CE have? [closed]
| Halo 2 ( 1-50) rank system:
40%
|
|
(8 Votes)
|
| Halo Reach ( cR) point system:
35%
|
|
(7 Votes)
|
| Both ( Depending on what game type you choose):
25%
|
|
(5 Votes)
|
Total Votes: 20
Halo one was a great game. Pretty competitive even though it was not ranked nor there was xbox live. Halo 2 came around and it was ALL about competition. Halo 3 made its way and even though it was ranked 1-50 it lost its competition game play. Halo reach finally released and all the competitive game play disappeared.
I understand there is a lot of people who play Halo for fun. I have no problem with that, i also play it for fun. But i also am very competitive when it comes to halo games. But lets not forget what type of a game this is. This isn't just some computer game you play. After all how many thousands of people go to MLG events. It is what began the Halo legacy. Competition. It seems like Halo has forgot about that.
When i play reach there is so many things wrong with it that i just cant play for longer than 30 minutes. There is no motivation to be competitive what so ever. You try to play for fun but the game just isnt fun. If reach had the ranking system halo 2 had, im pretty sure i would be playing it a lot more. What do you get in return when you win a halo reach game? Some crappy cR points. That motivates me so much to start another game and win. Not.
I know a lot of people don't play for competition but the ones that do, like my self, i would like to see halo 2 rank system in this new Halo CE remake. If not, i would at least like to see a couple game types that are ranked like halo 2. Why is it so hard to make ranked play lists with the 1-50 rank system like halo 2 for the players who play to be competitive, and still have play lists for the people who play for fun?
Just wondering what you guys think on this topic. Post any info you have on this or your opinion.