- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: IRISH 249
I couldn't disagree more with your entire premise, and therefore your conclusion. Declaring that Bungie "rushed Reach" does not make it fact. The things you listed as "problems" are your opinions, not fact. I find Reach incredible in everyway and I certainly do not find Reach rushed.
Posted by: superduper66
So it seems to me that Halo Reach was obviously rushed and incomplete, being released with several bugs and problems, balance issues, and overall performance issues, possibly even a lack of enough time for a decent Campaign (opinion, you decide).
So my question is do you think Bungie will rush their next game like they did so tragically with Reach?
I'm not the hugest Gears of War fan, but I remember hearing that the creators elongated the release date for Gears 3 so as to make for a better game instead of a rushed crappy sequel. I'd like to see devotion such as that for Bungie. Nobody likes halfassed stuff. Not that Reach was completely halfassed, but it definitely wasn't what it could have been.
He never said it was fact. In fact, he even admitted that some of what he was saying was his opinion.
Try not overreacting the next time someone criticizes a game you like, it kinda makes you look silly. The folks at Bungie are big boys who can handle and even learn from criticism, try to emulate them a bit more.
His response indicates otherwise. He is definitely stating his opinion as fact.
Posted by: superduper66
It's not a matter of feeling rushed or opinion (besides my comment on the campaign). Reach was rushed. There are game performance issues, several bugs, and some balancing problems with a few things.