Bungie.net Community
This topic has moved here: Subject: Lets Be Honest Guise. Have You Ever Read All The Rules?
  • Subject: Lets Be Honest Guise. Have You Ever Read All The Rules?
Subject: Lets Be Honest Guise. Have You Ever Read All The Rules?

Posted by: Commander GX
Bungie.Match.com: Our Johnson knows what the ladies like.

Many times. Every time I make a thread I review the rules to make sure it doesn't violate anything.

  • 09.22.2011 5:58 PM PDT

I don't, although it would probably save me numerous bans.
*notes habit for reference*
Also, hot topic +1!
Posted by: M94 Mushroom Man
Many times. Every time I make a thread I review the rules to make sure it doesn't violate anything.

  • 09.22.2011 6:02 PM PDT

Hey, now!

This is officially either the greatest or worst thing to ever happen to Star Wars. I'm going with the former.

Yes. As soon as I joined I read them front-to-back.
I wasn't taking any chances.

  • 09.22.2011 6:05 PM PDT

Posted by: Commander GX
Bungie.Match.com: Our Johnson knows what the ladies like.


Posted by: ctjl96
I don't, although it would probably save me numerous bans.
*notes habit for reference*
Also, hot topic +1!
Posted by: M94 Mushroom Man
Many times. Every time I make a thread I review the rules to make sure it doesn't violate anything.


In a couple decades, your title could be like mine!!

  • 09.22.2011 6:05 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Pfhor new members:
Hello, I am *****. I am a very active Bungie.net member and If you do not understand or need help with something with Bungie.net you can message me. I will reply with a correct and accuate answer. Welcome to the Seventh Column Army.

Yes.

  • 09.22.2011 6:05 PM PDT

Half Man.
Half Horse.
Half Machine.
All "Jerk Who's Really Bad at Math."

PS
No, I do not want to join your clan/group.

Posted by: chubbz
Nope. I have this thing called common sense.

Pretty much this, save that I did finally read them last month. Nothing surprising in there, really; all of it should be pretty standard if you're at least semi-mature.

  • 09.22.2011 6:06 PM PDT

δόξει τις ἀμαθεῖ σοφὰ λέγων οὐκ εὖ φρονεῖν.

Euripides, Bacchae. 480.

Is Guise the Italian guy?

  • 09.22.2011 6:06 PM PDT

"I wanted to make people happy, if only for an hour."
-Busby Berkley

RIP Halo 2

Why would I read the rules?

  • 09.22.2011 6:14 PM PDT

Have A Nice Day!

Commander, CammCam's Queensguard; Sapphire Mod; 34th Seat, Table of Avalon(Exiled);Captain, HAND

yolo? -blam!- that! YOLTOSS!! You Only Live Twice or Some -blam!-


Posted by: Centauratron
Posted by: chubbz
Nope. I have this thing called common sense.

Pretty much this, save that I did finally read them last month. Nothing surprising in there, really; all of it should be pretty standard if you're at least semi-mature.


All of the above. Plus, I do a thing called lurking. Pick and choose where you discuss things. When you see a topic that has been banned or a member blacklisted, check the forum for posts by ninjas to see why this happened. You can learn a lot by just stalking for a bit. Sounds creepy, but it will keep you out of trouble.

  • 09.22.2011 6:34 PM PDT

Hello, I'm Mr AwesomePizza. I like pizza and I'm a man. Reasoning for the name. I like to listen to the classics of music, write poetry, play video games, and much much more. I'm always down for a nice chat, so please hit me up for some conversation.

I read all of the old rules,and I've read the new rules. Do I think it is needed? No, it is mostly based on common sense. The only parts where people should read is what counts as spam, because that's where people mess up the most.

  • 09.22.2011 6:44 PM PDT

Non facete nobis calcitrare vestrvm perinaevm.

Posted by: Achronos
You imply a level of control over Halo: Reach matchmaking that we no longer have. Or, in your vernacular, it isn't our shiznit anymore.


Active 9/1/11, Heroic 12/25/12

Play by the rules or get pushed off the bridge.

  • 09.22.2011 6:49 PM PDT

Yes, I have read them.

  • 09.22.2011 7:02 PM PDT

Have you seen my mind anywhere? I seem to have lost it...

0x0 x0x 0x0 000 000 x0x 000
x0x 0x0 0x0 0xx 000 0x0 000
x0x x0x x00 0xx 0x0 x0x 0x0

I have seen you future

I read the long rules, the short rules, the COC and TOU. I have too much free time.

  • 09.22.2011 7:04 PM PDT

I'm the cult of personality,
I call it like i see it, if i feel the need to be blunt and to the point, then i will, if i feel the need to be very detailed, i will, im here to stay and im here to do things my way, if you respect that or not is your choice, not mine,
and don't worry, while i don't agree with everyone's opinion, i do respect everyone's opinion.

yup, multiple times actualy, while i only have a preoblem with one spacific rule, i still read them.

[Edited on 09.22.2011 7:16 PM PDT]

  • 09.22.2011 7:15 PM PDT

',:|


Posted by: Chalupa King117
Yes, but it doesn't really matter because you learn what the rules are by getting banned.
That seems awfully inefficient.

  • 09.22.2011 7:16 PM PDT

Which one?
Posted by: Insane AlphaBeta
yup, multiple times, while i think one spacific rule should be changed, i still read them.

  • 09.22.2011 7:16 PM PDT

I'm the cult of personality,
I call it like i see it, if i feel the need to be blunt and to the point, then i will, if i feel the need to be very detailed, i will, im here to stay and im here to do things my way, if you respect that or not is your choice, not mine,
and don't worry, while i don't agree with everyone's opinion, i do respect everyone's opinion.


Posted by: ctjl96
Which one?
Posted by: Insane AlphaBeta
yup, multiple times, while i think one spacific rule should be changed, i still read them.

the no politics/religious discussion rule,

here is my issue,

you can't truly get rid of a problem unless you get rid of the source, banning/warning the people who participate in these kinds of threads doesn't sole anything, and results in unneeded bans, all it does is create issues,

threads are made for discussion, i understand why this rule was made, but i don't understand the need to warn/ban people who simply participate, mainly the ones who do not cause any trouble within the thread, if people flame in the threads then yes, a warning/ban is needed for those specific people, but banning/warning everyone within the thread is nonsense, becuase all they are doing is banning/warning people who did not cause any trouble to begin with.

that is the problem i have with the rule, its not the rule itself, but the details, if someone makes a thread people should have the freedom to discuss it, if they flame, troll etc etc, then yes action should be taken, if they don't violate any rules, they should be fine.

[Edited on 09.22.2011 7:27 PM PDT]

  • 09.22.2011 7:26 PM PDT

Here's my stance on the problem:

Political discussion should be allowed, to an extent. I believe that The Flood can handle political discussion at a mature level without too much immaturity. I believe that there may be many mature discussions in The Flood if such a rule were passed.

However, religion is simply out of the question. If you regulate that forum, then you would know how all of the atheists are just "lolchristianity"-ing all the Christians, as well as any other religions. I do not think The Flood is yet ready for that level of discussion, AB.
Posted by: Insane AlphaBeta

Posted by: ctjl96
Which one?
Posted by: Insane AlphaBeta
yup, multiple times, while i think one spacific rule should be changed, i still read them.

the no politics/religious discussion rule,

here is my issue,

you can't truly get rid of a problem unless you get rid of the source, banning/warning the people who participate in these kinds of threads doesn't sole anything, and results in unneeded bans, all it does is create issues,

threads are made for discussion, i understand why this rule was made, but i don't understand the need to warn/ban people who simply participate, mainly the ones who do not cause any trouble within the thread, if people flame in the threads then yes, a warning/ban is needed for those specific people, but banning/warning everyone within the thread is nonsense, becuase all they are doing is banning/warning people who did not cause any trouble to begin with.

that is the problem i have with the rule, its not the rule itself, but the details, if someone makes a thread people should have the freedom to discuss it, if they flame, troll etc etc, then yes action should be taken, if they don't violate any rules, they should be fine.

  • 09.22.2011 7:31 PM PDT

Key

I'm still confused as to why you spelled it "guise". You know that's not lolspeek right? It's a legit word; one that means nothing like the word you meant to use...

  • 09.22.2011 7:48 PM PDT

Doesn't it mean like, to hide something? Like, a fake? Disguise?
Posted by: CrazzySnipe55
I'm still confused as to why you spelled it "guise". You know that's not lolspeek right? It's a legit word; one that means nothing like the word you meant to use...

  • 09.22.2011 7:55 PM PDT

Posted by: Commander GX
Bungie.Match.com: Our Johnson knows what the ladies like.


Posted by: ctjl96
Doesn't it mean like, to hide something? Like, a fake? Disguise?
Posted by: CrazzySnipe55
I'm still confused as to why you spelled it "guise". You know that's not lolspeek right? It's a legit word; one that means nothing like the word you meant to use...


Guise.

  • 09.22.2011 7:56 PM PDT

Average Joe l Youtube Channel l Twitter
Fools react, masters respond

~B.B.

I have before, the last time being when the rules were updated back in January.

~Hawk

[Edited on 09.22.2011 7:58 PM PDT]

  • 09.22.2011 7:57 PM PDT

Intolerance is the highest level of stupidity and inbred thinking.

MI: 5213901 UI: 5244621

I've read the forum rules, ToU, and CoC multiple times over. Well, not so many times the ToU and CoC, but I have read the rules many times, and it's paid off. I've only gotten one warning, and I still stand that it was a completely unwarranted one at that.

I would never use other members for examples on how to act, and especially not moderators. When it comes to members there are a lot of different factors that weigh into what they can and can not do. I'm not saying bias, but older members are definitely better known, and in turn maybe their humor is better understood, so they can get away with more.

Moderators are the biggest trolls around half the time, so you'd be better off using the Flood for a role model then you would be using them. <3

Read the rules. They're short, and it keeps you from getting your ass kicked.

  • 09.22.2011 8:04 PM PDT

I went to The Flood for a few months, and my bans went down a bit. They would have gone down all the way if I had behaved.
Posted by: RollinRollin13
I've read the forum rules, ToU, and CoC multiple times over. Well, not so many times the ToU and CoC, but I have read the rules many times, and it's paid off. I've only gotten one warning, and I still stand that it was a completely unwarranted one at that.

I would never use other members for examples on how to act, and especially not moderators. When it comes to members there are a lot of different factors that weigh into what they can and can not do. I'm not saying bias, but older members are definitely better known, and in turn maybe their humor is better understood, so they can get away with more.

Moderators are the biggest trolls around half the time, so you'd be better off using the Flood for a role model then you would be using them. <3

Read the rules. They're short, and it keeps you from getting your ass kicked.

  • 09.22.2011 8:06 PM PDT

XBL: l Sonic l
PSN: Sonic_343

I read them for fun. :)

  • 09.22.2011 8:06 PM PDT