- hotshot revan II
- |
- Honorable Heroic Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
"Time was your ally human. But now it has abandoned you. The Forerunners....have returned. And this tomb... is now yours". - The Didact
Posted by: oaklandp8ntbalr
Anniversary, to me, is 90% of Bungie's work.
-The campaign engine is still 10 years old with the same AI and physics. Most of the engine is still Bungie's
-343 only made a graphics update. IMO, the frame rate looked rather awful in the trailers.
-The multiplayer is a blatant copy-and-paste of Reach.
I'm not buying Anniversary because, to me, it's just a graphics update + DLC for something I already bought 10 years ago. Not worth $40 to me.
I'm worried about Halo 4. There's no definitive evidence for or against it, BUT...
They built Halo 4 and CEA in less than two years. Building one video game in two years is hard, but making TWO? That doesn't bode well...
There is a reason why Sabre and CA were part of the Halo CEA team too,so that the bulk of 343 can work on Halo 4 while a several other members work alongside Sabre and CA on the remake.
BTW it's good to know that they planned the entire story for the new trilogy from the beginning unlike the original trilogy which wasn't even planned to be a trilogy.
So normally we souldn't get cases like we had with the Halo 2 story.
BTW Halo 4 was in development as of 2008(Walpoles website says so)
2008-2012 are 4 years,more then the 3 years for the other games(excluding Wars)