Bungie Universe
This topic has moved here: Subject: do you think 343 industries will destroy the halo franchise
  • Subject: do you think 343 industries will destroy the halo franchise
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: do you think 343 industries will destroy the halo franchise
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

"Time was your ally human. But now it has abandoned you. The Forerunners....have returned. And this tomb... is now yours". - The Didact


Posted by: josh 5511
It already destroyed the franchise when it announced a new Halo trilogy.



You're hopeless...

  • 09.24.2011 2:12 PM PDT

Halo reach alone on legendary! Message me to play halo wars, too. im the only person here who likes halo wars.

its no doubt they will do amazing things that everyone will effin love, but also things that people effin hate. thats how new games go. there were things people hated in the games when bungie was there, but now that halo is in the hands of new people, people will blame crappy things on it. itll be the same as any other game, cept PEOPLE will be skeptical. dont be, people. im not sure if i explained that correctly...

  • 09.24.2011 2:15 PM PDT

To be honest if anyone thinks (not feels like) that 343 is going to ruin Halo at this point then they're less intelligent than a gold fish.

Wait until Halo: Aniversary, then you can decide with actual evidence.

  • 09.24.2011 2:25 PM PDT


Posted by: Buzz the Fuzz
To be honest if anyone thinks (not feels like) that 343 is going to ruin Halo at this point then they're less intelligent than a gold fish.

Wait until Halo: Aniversary, then you can decide with actual evidence.


To be honest, if anyone calls somebody stupid for not thinking 343 will be the best thing ever for halo due to thinking on what information has been given, they must not have common sense...

And you mean, wait until Halo 4 and glasslands. As HCEA doesn't really show anything majorly new.

  • 09.24.2011 2:32 PM PDT

Generalizations.
Helping idiots hate other idiots since people have existed.

Anniversary, to me, is 90% of Bungie's work.
-The campaign engine is still 10 years old with the same AI and physics. Most of the engine is still Bungie's
-343 only made a graphics update. IMO, the frame rate looked rather awful in the trailers.
-The multiplayer is a blatant copy-and-paste of Reach.
I'm not buying Anniversary because, to me, it's just a graphics update + DLC for something I already bought 10 years ago. Not worth $40 to me.

I'm worried about Halo 4. There's no definitive evidence for or against it, BUT...
They built Halo 4 and CEA in less than two years. Building one video game in two years is hard, but making TWO? That doesn't bode well...

[Edited on 09.24.2011 2:41 PM PDT]

  • 09.24.2011 2:40 PM PDT

@accordingto343

Your one stop shop for all of 343's fabulous errors and ridiculous notions in the Halo lore.

I'm just upset they came out and said "We're making a new trilogy", kinda dampens the mystery really.

  • 09.24.2011 2:44 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

"Time was your ally human. But now it has abandoned you. The Forerunners....have returned. And this tomb... is now yours". - The Didact


Posted by: oaklandp8ntbalr
Anniversary, to me, is 90% of Bungie's work.
-The campaign engine is still 10 years old with the same AI and physics. Most of the engine is still Bungie's
-343 only made a graphics update. IMO, the frame rate looked rather awful in the trailers.
-The multiplayer is a blatant copy-and-paste of Reach.
I'm not buying Anniversary because, to me, it's just a graphics update + DLC for something I already bought 10 years ago. Not worth $40 to me.

I'm worried about Halo 4. There's no definitive evidence for or against it, BUT...
They built Halo 4 and CEA in less than two years. Building one video game in two years is hard, but making TWO? That doesn't bode well...


There is a reason why Sabre and CA were part of the Halo CEA team too,so that the bulk of 343 can work on Halo 4 while a several other members work alongside Sabre and CA on the remake.

BTW it's good to know that they planned the entire story for the new trilogy from the beginning unlike the original trilogy which wasn't even planned to be a trilogy.

So normally we souldn't get cases like we had with the Halo 2 story.

BTW Halo 4 was in development as of 2008(Walpoles website says so)

2008-2012 are 4 years,more then the 3 years for the other games(excluding Wars)

  • 09.24.2011 2:47 PM PDT


Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: Buzz the Fuzz
To be honest if anyone thinks (not feels like) that 343 is going to ruin Halo at this point then they're less intelligent than a gold fish.

Wait until Halo: Aniversary, then you can decide with actual evidence.


To be honest, if anyone calls somebody stupid for not thinking 343 will be the best thing ever for halo due to thinking on what information has been given, they must not have common sense...

And you mean, wait until Halo 4 and glasslands. As HCEA doesn't really show anything majorly new.


I never said they're stupid for thinking 343 isn't the best thing ever, I said (or meant if you want) they're not to intelligent (I went over the top a bit, I admit) for thinking they're going to destroy (hence the title) Halo based on little evidence.

You're right about Halo 4 and Glasslands though, it's probably pointless judging 343 on HaloCEA since it's really just an update of a game that has all ready been made.

  • 09.24.2011 2:52 PM PDT


Posted by: oaklandp8ntbalr
Anniversary, to me, is 90% of Bungie's work.
-The campaign engine is still 10 years old with the same AI and physics. Most of the engine is still Bungie's
-343 only made a graphics update. IMO, the frame rate looked rather awful in the trailers.
-The multiplayer is a blatant copy-and-paste of Reach.
I'm not buying Anniversary because, to me, it's just a graphics update + DLC for something I already bought 10 years ago. Not worth $40 to me.

I'm worried about Halo 4. There's no definitive evidence for or against it, BUT...
They built Halo 4 and CEA in less than two years. Building one video game in two years is hard, but making TWO? That doesn't bode well...


They also added terminals that will tell a story that tie in with the upcoming books and H4. Do you really wanna miss some possibly vital information of an epic story?

  • 09.25.2011 2:46 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Fabled Legendary Member

I understand nothing because my life is a conspiracy.


Posted by: josh 5511
It already destroyed the franchise when it announced a new Halo trilogy.

  • 09.25.2011 5:01 AM PDT

The road to success is always under construction.

I'm not going to decide until Glasslands, Primordium and H4 comes out.

  • 09.25.2011 9:53 AM PDT

Welcome to bungie, you have no rights. play nice!
CLICK!

Oh yeah, title update.

  • 09.25.2011 10:33 AM PDT

https://www.facebook.com/Number01Starscream

People always complained about every halo game that comes out while others enjoy them.. because of this video game makers dont know if thier game satifies its customers
Complainers go on the forums and talk c r a p about the game
Satisfied gamers stay home playing the game

  • 09.27.2011 2:54 PM PDT

97% OF TEENS WON'T STAND UP FOR GOD. IF YOU'RE ONE OF THE 3% WHO WILL, PUT THIS IN YOUR SIG.
As comrades we have outlasted this storm known as life.
As allies we have fought through the fires across the depths of Hell. As friends we are victorious but as brothers we stand united. WE ARE RESURCTED!
The Revisionaries

Seeing as they're a branch off of Bungie, and they helped make CE. I'd say they're gonna rock the whole thing!

  • 09.27.2011 4:00 PM PDT

@accordingto343

Your one stop shop for all of 343's fabulous errors and ridiculous notions in the Halo lore.

Posted by: Twinkerdoodle
Seeing as they're a branch off of Bungie, and they helped make CE. I'd say they're gonna rock the whole thing!


They didn't help make Combat Evolved...

  • 09.27.2011 4:01 PM PDT

Cameron

i used to believe that Halo wars was filled with holes in the plot but then I realized that everything that happened in the game was indeed valid. I believe that it was a great game and that 343 will do a great job on the Reclaimer Trilogy and any other games they decide to make.

  • 09.27.2011 6:00 PM PDT

No they have the good ole original Bungie guys

  • 09.27.2011 6:23 PM PDT

PEANUT-BUTTER SLAP!

Posted by: Twinkerdoodle
Seeing as they're a branch off of Bungie, and they helped make CE.
Nope.Posted by: Legit BR
No they have the good ole original Bungie guys
Nope.

  • 09.27.2011 6:34 PM PDT

I don't like the halo lore very much seeing that the game came BEFORE the lore, it just seems like to me that they need someone else to pick up their slack.
Then again Halo is directly influenced by Ringworld and IMO slightly by Warhammer 40k.

  • 09.27.2011 10:53 PM PDT


Posted by: MAJ DIRKA DIRKA1
I don't like the halo lore very much seeing that the game came BEFORE the lore, it just seems like to me that they need someone else to pick up their slack.
Then again Halo is directly influenced by Ringworld and IMO slightly by Warhammer 40k.


However, there is much influence from Marathon, as well (I may just keep bringing this up, btw.... idk why, I'm just sorta on a kick right now...).

  • 09.27.2011 10:59 PM PDT

My gt:old school dude Posted by: FlameSword Halo never asks me for anything, is always quiet, and I can play with her all night. Can a girlfriend do that? I didn't think so. Posted by: PhatMxican Thanks Shishka...Now I'm illegal in the US and in Halo 3. Way to make my day.Member Since:3/17/2005 1:52 PM PST

just because bungie birthed it, doesnt mean it cant be handled with care by a different company and have a fresh breath of air. People always look at the negatives, what about the positives? They might do something long needed in the halo games.

  • 09.27.2011 11:43 PM PDT

i think 343 will not have the same ways of making halo but it will do for most of the halo players including myself

  • 09.27.2011 11:51 PM PDT

Don't -blam!- with Kerser!

I would rather Bungie making Halo. 343 made Halo 4 look weird...

  • 09.28.2011 12:55 AM PDT

Microsoft will ruin Halo, not 343i.

It's not like they have to try hard to make Halo 4 better than Reach.

  • 09.28.2011 2:29 AM PDT

I think they're going to inject a new lease of life into the franchise. They already have, actually.

  • 09.28.2011 7:45 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4