- risay_117
- |
- Legendary Member
Posted by: GAMERXD001
UNSC Marine < US Marine (Weaker)
No as the UNSC Marine canon wise have the same training as a US Marine, what gives UNSC the edge is equipment with armour and other things included that aren't added due to gameplay problems and haven't added due to no one thinking about them.
Posted by: GAMERXD001
Vulcan Hog < Hummer
No as a warthog can take plasma damage and still drive a Vulcan Hog is more likely to die with one hit. Also the turrent on a Hog is more dangerous due to stronger rounds able to penetrate the Hummer and easier maneuverability which allows the gunner to be more prone to hit. If an ODST was there he would survive many shots due to their armour.
Posted by: GAMERXD001
Longsword > B7 Spirit or F117 Stealth (Better Weapons)
Not only that Longswords were not made for stealth but for blowing things up in the thick of a battle they have more armour design was based on old stealth bomber. What the UNSC have for stealth is still not known.
Posted by: GAMERXD001
M808B Scorpion < M1 Abrahms (Easier to kill)
Cheaper to make and more in number. Although due to one passenger and smaller space if you hit anything like the wheels but not the Main Gun and Passenger area you are screwed as everything is in that tiny space. The M1 will be pierced by the Scorpion and will lose equipment necessary to fire the gun. Which will make it useless.
Posted by: GAMERXD001
C-130 < AC-220 Vulture (Almost equal firepower, but the 130 has a speed advantage)
The AC-220 was to be a tank with huge weapons like missiles. These would likely have longer range and able to heat seak and hit their intended target.
Sad to say but the C-130 has to aim to its gun by flying by the vulture any shots could be dodged. The AC-220 has ability to turn and can take alot of hits. If the C-130 flies by it will damage the Vulture but will lose ability to shoot as the guns are only on one side.
Plus the Vulture can easily turn and aim at the aircraft that is flying towards it across the field and fire one missile taking it out even before the C-130 comes by and aims its guns.
Posted by: GAMERXD001
If you don't bring in spartans, odst's, or space related weaponry...It could be a draw.
Plus both sides have .50cal snipers, 8-gauge shottys, rockets, noob tubes, machine guns, mini-guns, strong pistols.
Plus MW has the US Army Rangers & US Navy Seals...which both could handle fighting UNSC Marines, and maybe even ODST's.
Saying that MW would loose would be an insult to the US military in a way cause your saying they would lose...america has backed down but never lost.
Just admit it, if you make it fair, it would end in a draw...MW has superior soldiers & vehicles, but UNSC has more troops.
No US Navy Seals sad to say have nothing on ODST who have armour to block even .50 cal plus the SAS have a better special forces that will pwn the Navy Seals sorry to say that. Price is from the SAS.
Also the vehicle and the upgrades will give the UNSC a superior ability on the battlefield.
The superior soldiers you talk about are a joke they have little to no armor against UNSC weapons that were drawn back in the game due to the shielding. Also US Army are very weak they have low mortality rate cause of advanced medicine able to bring them alive and armor to save them, there are 10,000 or more injured soldiers with missing limbs etc.
Vehicles have nothing on them also the games were balanced so that it was a good game, does not show what they truly could do. They will have to look into it more to show how effective they are. Scorpions were made to be cheap and able to stand up against the Covenant army with high numbers of tank. The UNSC have other weapons including grizzlies that will annihilate an M1 even if the M1 got to shoot and hit the Grizzly first.
Even with few troops and equal troops the UNSC will win. Their RPG even can lock onto targets that are high up and the damage they do are enough to bring down an Apache before it could do damage.
The UNSC also has tanks to take out air forces in big numbers even those shielded.