Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [35 votes]: do you think bungie should get back the rights to halo and continue h3
  • Poll [35 votes]: do you think bungie should get back the rights to halo and continue h3
Subject: do you think bungie should get back the rights to halo and continue h3

Poll: do you think bungie should get back the rights to halo and continue h3  [closed]
yes:  26%
(9 Votes)
no:  29%
(10 Votes)
maybe:  3%
(1 Votes)
they cant:  17%
(6 Votes)
i dont know and i dont care:  0%
(0 Votes)
get off the forums you noob:  11%
(4 Votes)
shut up:  6%
(2 Votes)
nobody cares:  9%
(3 Votes)
Total Votes: 35

come on answer what do you thing

  • 10.28.2011 10:15 PM PDT

?

  • 10.28.2011 10:23 PM PDT

when bungie split with microsoft they made a deal so now bungie cant make halo and this is to ask if you think bungie should try to get permission to make halo again and then keep making halo 3 you know like new armor new achievement you know keep adding to the game

  • 10.28.2011 10:30 PM PDT

PEANUT-BUTTER SLAP!

Even if Bungie could (or wanted to) buy back the series, what makes you think they would do anything with Halo 3?

  • 10.28.2011 10:36 PM PDT

Posted by: reptile1892
Even if Bungie could (or wanted to) buy back the series, what makes you think they would do anything with Halo 3?

i think they would add on to halo three because off all they're games more people want an addition to halo 3 more then the other halos i mean lets face it halo wars and reach were kind of just dissapointments and you cant play ce and two on xbox live anymore so all thats left is three and ODST

  • 10.28.2011 10:39 PM PDT

PEANUT-BUTTER SLAP!

Posted by: sufficingmilk
i think they would add on to halo three because off all they're games more people want an addition to halo 3 more then the other halos i mean lets face it halo wars and reach were kind of just dissapointments and you cant play ce and two on xbox live anymore so all thats left is three and ODST
Now that's just your opinion. Even if it were a fact, Reach is still the dominant game, and the dominant game takes priority over all else.

  • 10.28.2011 10:55 PM PDT

Posted by: reptile1892
Posted by: sufficingmilk
i think they would add on to halo three because off all they're games more people want an addition to halo 3 more then the other halos i mean lets face it halo wars and reach were kind of just dissapointments and you cant play ce and two on xbox live anymore so all thats left is three and ODST
Now that's just your opinion. Even if it were a fact, Reach is still the dominant game, and the dominant game takes priority over all else.

ya thats true

  • 10.28.2011 10:57 PM PDT

In memory of those fallen in the defense of Earth and her colonies.

March 3, 2553

No.

They will probably release a patch making it into Halo Reach because they are that retarded.

  • 10.28.2011 11:58 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

They lost their creative minds a long time ago. Reach is an example of their indecisiveness/lacking motivation/emphasis on multiplayer (campaign's game plot was crap).

CEA, H4, and the simultaneously being released Halo material indicates a greater focus on campaign/Halo lore, the way Halo was meant to be.

  • 10.29.2011 8:31 PM PDT

░░░░░░░░░░▒█▓▒░░▒█▒░░░▒███████▒░░░▒▒█████▒▒░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░▒██▓▒░▒█▒░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▒▒░░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▓█▒░░░░░░░░░░ ░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▒█▓█▓▒▒█▒░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▒░░░░░▒█▒░░░▒█▒░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░ ░▓██████▓░▒█▒▓█▓▒█▒░░░▒██████▒░░░░▒█▒░░░▒█▒░▓██████▓░ ░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▒█▒▒▓█▓█▒░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▒░░░░░▒█▒░░░▒█▒░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░ ░░░░░░░░░░▒█▒░▒▓██▒░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▒▒░░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▓█▒░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░▒█▒░░▒▓█▒░░░▒███████▒░░░▒▒█████▒▒░░░░░░░░░░


Posted by: Sliding Ghost

CEA, H4, and the simultaneously being released Halo material indicates a greater focus on campaign/Halo lore, the way Halo was meant to be.

Well, we hope.

Nothing is stopping 343i from making H4 squeal to reach gameplay-wise, and HCEA is the easiest game to make, just copypasta from HCE and Reach.

  • 10.29.2011 11:52 PM PDT

Posted by: Sliding Ghost
They lost their creative minds a long time ago. Reach is an example of their indecisiveness/lacking motivation/emphasis on multiplayer (campaign's game plot was crap).

CEA, H4, and the simultaneously being released Halo material indicates a greater focus on campaign/Halo lore, the way Halo was meant to be.

well actually the main reason for reach being so bad is the fact that the main designers and writers left the company now if they would have had those writers and designers from CE-3 then reach might have actually been good

  • 10.30.2011 12:54 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: StNeoJimmy X49

Posted by: Sliding Ghost

CEA, H4, and the simultaneously being released Halo material indicates a greater focus on campaign/Halo lore, the way Halo was meant to be.

Well, we hope.

Nothing is stopping 343i from making H4 squeal to reach gameplay-wise, and HCEA is the easiest game to make, just copypasta from HCE and Reach.
True. If we see worsened friendly AI or they remain unchanged from Reach and the enemy AI still have cheap advantages, 343 will lose my support/purchases.

To accommodate for friendly AI in Halo 2 having shields/not stumbling from shots like in CE, they reduced their AI, particularly, their responsiveness to grenades and such. It was improved in H3, but in Reach, it was an absolute disaster:

-take too long to get in vehicle
-take too long turning to swap weapons
-get shot down in seconds on Legendary
-friendly fire against player and each other occurs a lot whereas in Halo 2 and Halo 3, friendly fire was most of the time the latter

Whereas enemies:

-do too much damage
-nearly all Elites seem to share the same stun time and shield recharge rate
-way too fast melee. I drop out of nowhere, they just run up to me and beat me down like they were never surprised
-focus on the player more
-concussion rifle wielders do a lot of damage with it whereas player can't do -blam!- with it. And their projectile speed increases the higher the difficulty
-Jackals are too buffed


Posted by: sufficingmilk
well actually the main reason for reach being so bad is the fact that the main designers and writers left the company now if they would have had those writers and designers from CE-3 then reach might have actually been good
What kind of designers? Gameplay? Graphics? All of them? What does their leaving tell us? Doesn't it mean they lost interest/motivation? So would it really matter if they didn't leave?

[Edited on 10.30.2011 12:59 PM PDT]

  • 10.30.2011 12:57 PM PDT

"What are we holding on to, Sam?"
"That there's some good in this world, and it's worth fighting for."

I wish that Halo 3 could still be maintained, but it's just not worth taking it away from 343. Bungie had a great run with Halo, but I think they're just ready to move on. 343 has a lot of passion for the franchise and could do really well with it. It just wouldn't be fair to them. If 343 wants to maintain Halo 3, that would be great.

  • 10.30.2011 4:50 PM PDT

having another trilogy of halo games just shows how 'off the original plot' its gonna end up. No matter how much we all wish, halo 3 will never be revived by updates (i hope im wrong though). the community is the only thing which is keeping halo 3 on life support at the moment.

  • 10.30.2011 7:39 PM PDT

no. nonono

Considering the fact that they haven't touched Halo 3 in over a year, I say no. However, I voted for "get off the forums you stupid noob".

  • 10.31.2011 1:50 AM PDT

I DO have time to bleed...i just dont want to.


Posted by: reptile1892
Posted by: sufficingmilk
i think they would add on to halo three because off all they're games more people want an addition to halo 3 more then the other halos i mean lets face it halo wars and reach were kind of just dissapointments and you cant play ce and two on xbox live anymore so all thats left is three and ODST
Now that's just your opinion. Even if it were a fact, Reach is still the dominant game, and the dominant game takes priority over all else.

ok put it this way. halo reach is a prequel and halo 3 is a sequel so usualy the later one is more important to any francise

  • 11.02.2011 8:35 AM PDT

Bungie will never get the rights back they made there decisions to depart from Microsoft and 2010 was there last year i believe they used Halo and they've made a deal with Activision so 343 Industries have the right and nobody cares :)

  • 11.02.2011 9:23 AM PDT

Main Account: Nemesis Inf3rno (50)
Main Account = Perm Banned (Thanks Microsoft >.<)
http://www.youtube.com/ClanNemesisH3
http://www.youtube.com/NemesisBoosts50s
Likes: MLG, TD, HLG, Sigz
My Sigz? - GT: A Crafty Koala
TD 50 - TS 50 - TSW 50 - LW 42 - TSN 42 - MLG 29


Posted by: GOLDENSKULL95

Posted by: reptile1892
Posted by: sufficingmilk
i think they would add on to halo three because off all they're games more people want an addition to halo 3 more then the other halos i mean lets face it halo wars and reach were kind of just dissapointments and you cant play ce and two on xbox live anymore so all thats left is three and ODST
Now that's just your opinion. Even if it were a fact, Reach is still the dominant game, and the dominant game takes priority over all else.

ok put it this way. halo reach is a prequel and halo 3 is a sequel so usualy the later one is more important to any francise


You are an idiot.

  • 11.02.2011 12:30 PM PDT

BrAdLeY

Yes, Halo 3 should remain under Bungie's control.

  • 11.02.2011 5:21 PM PDT

I like your spawn can I have it?

I don't think they can. At least not for 10 more years. And even if they could I don't think MS would take the series away from 343.

  • 11.02.2011 5:30 PM PDT

I DO have time to bleed...i just dont want to.


Posted by: HL 2the G

Posted by: GOLDENSKULL95

Posted by: reptile1892
Posted by: sufficingmilk
i think they would add on to halo three because off all they're games more people want an addition to halo 3 more then the other halos i mean lets face it halo wars and reach were kind of just dissapointments and you cant play ce and two on xbox live anymore so all thats left is three and ODST
Now that's just your opinion. Even if it were a fact, Reach is still the dominant game, and the dominant game takes priority over all else.

ok put it this way. halo reach is a prequel and halo 3 is a sequel so usualy the later one is more important to any francise


You are an idiot.

no you. stop following me around on forums :P

  • 11.03.2011 4:40 AM PDT

░░░░░░░░░░▒█▓▒░░▒█▒░░░▒███████▒░░░▒▒█████▒▒░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░▒██▓▒░▒█▒░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▒▒░░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▓█▒░░░░░░░░░░ ░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▒█▓█▓▒▒█▒░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▒░░░░░▒█▒░░░▒█▒░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░ ░▓██████▓░▒█▒▓█▓▒█▒░░░▒██████▒░░░░▒█▒░░░▒█▒░▓██████▓░ ░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▒█▒▒▓█▓█▒░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▒░░░░░▒█▒░░░▒█▒░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░ ░░░░░░░░░░▒█▒░▒▓██▒░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▒▒░░░░▒█▓▒▒▒▓█▒░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░▒█▒░░▒▓█▒░░░▒███████▒░░░▒▒█████▒▒░░░░░░░░░░


Posted by: CantKillMe513
I don't think they can. At least not for 10 more years. And even if they could I don't think MS would take the series away from 343.

Microsoft CAN'T.

They MADE 343 to MAKE more Halo. Halo series made the most profit on both Xbox and 360. Unless 343 starts a new project that rakes up more profit than the original series, 343 will only be making Halo.

  • 11.09.2011 9:07 PM PDT