Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Sign of a bad game.
  • Subject: Sign of a bad game.
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: Sign of a bad game.


Posted by: A 3 Legged Goat
All I care about are the covenant crates.

HUMAN CRATES ARE VASTLY SUPERIOR.

  • 10.31.2011 3:40 PM PDT

I like Reach. =D

  • 10.31.2011 3:42 PM PDT

Call me Stu


Posted by: TheSpiderChief

Posted by: albinogoat
Can't really discuss opinions. Other than to say I disagree with you.

  • 10.31.2011 3:46 PM PDT

When I first got Reach I was like "Holy -blam!-...this is awesome!!"

Now...eh...it's alright, I guess. Could be better. I still play it though.

  • 10.31.2011 3:53 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Level. Get on it.


Posted by: RC Clone
Nope. SouthPole isn't a person. He's the avatar of the force of tryhards everywhere. He stalks the web looking for retards to set straight. He can not be stopped by mere bans or thread locks for he shall rise anew.

So is anyone going to actually comment on the topic, or are you simply going to put your fingers in your ears and shout "opinion"?

  • 11.03.2011 4:25 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Heroic Member

dipset ya dig

theres nothing to discuss with opinions n honestly reach is better if you cant get use to the dmr isnt that the same as kids who cant get used to the br
Posted by: SouthPoIe
When the good players have problems with it.
When a good player calls something unbalanced, it's unbalanced.
There isn't going to be the bias the bad players have.

Bad players often make up excuses as to why they're bad.
For example, the kids crying about the BR being overpowered/spammed.
There was nothing wrong with the BR. However, bad players didn't want to admit that they were bad, so they made excuses to make themselves feel better. They could have done this on purpose or subconsciously. I don't know.

Fact of the matter is, Reach is a bad game.

Discuss.

Posted by: SouthPoIe
When the good players have problems with it.
When a good player calls something unbalanced, it's unbalanced.
There isn't going to be the bias the bad players have.

Bad players often make up excuses as to why they're bad.
For example, the kids crying about the BR being overpowered/spammed.
There was nothing wrong with the BR. However, bad players didn't want to admit that they were bad, so they made excuses to make themselves feel better. They could have done this on purpose or subconsciously. I don't know.

Fact of the matter is, Reach is a bad game.

Discuss.

Posted by: SouthPoIe
When the good players have problems with it.
When a good player calls something unbalanced, it's unbalanced.
There isn't going to be the bias the bad players have.

Bad players often make up excuses as to why they're bad.
For example, the kids crying about the BR being overpowered/spammed.
There was nothing wrong with the BR. However, bad players didn't want to admit that they were bad, so they made excuses to make themselves feel better. They could have done this on purpose or subconsciously. I don't know.

Fact of the matter is, Reach is a bad game.

Discuss.

  • 11.03.2011 4:29 PM PDT

Get Some!


Posted by: Hi GunKoMa
Reach is good.

  • 11.03.2011 4:37 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Level. Get on it.


Posted by: RC Clone
Nope. SouthPole isn't a person. He's the avatar of the force of tryhards everywhere. He stalks the web looking for retards to set straight. He can not be stopped by mere bans or thread locks for he shall rise anew.


Posted by: mardok
theres nothing to discuss with opinions n honestly reach is better if you cant get use to the dmr isnt that the same as kids who cant get used to the br


It's not an opinion.
Reach is a badly designed game. Fact.

You can like it, but that doesn't make it a good game.
See the difference?

And the first post clearly flew right over your head.
The players "complaining" about the DMR are the good players.
What other reason besides THERE ACTUALLY BEING A PROBLEM would make the good players complain? Bad players complained about the BR in Halo 3 because they were bad.

Two completely different scenarios here.

  • 11.03.2011 4:41 PM PDT

>Don't like the DMR because of its flawed mechanics
>DURR HURR YOU JUST DON'T LIKE IT CAUSE YOU CAN'T GET USED TO IT

...right.

  • 11.03.2011 4:44 PM PDT

Why are you here?

Do you still have fun playing the game?

  • 11.03.2011 4:44 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Level. Get on it.


Posted by: RC Clone
Nope. SouthPole isn't a person. He's the avatar of the force of tryhards everywhere. He stalks the web looking for retards to set straight. He can not be stopped by mere bans or thread locks for he shall rise anew.


Posted by: VehementWolf54
Do you still have fun playing the game?

No, because it's a bad game.

  • 11.03.2011 4:45 PM PDT

Hi.

Usually when the best players say that a game has no competitive merit, said game is total failure.

  • 11.03.2011 4:51 PM PDT

You can not say a game is factually good or bad. What makes a game good is in the eye of the player playing it. What you may call a bad game, I may call a good game. What I may call a good game, you may call a bad game. It may have a lot of problems, but that does not make it a bad game for everyone. Take Oblivion for example.

  • 11.03.2011 5:20 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Level. Get on it.


Posted by: RC Clone
Nope. SouthPole isn't a person. He's the avatar of the force of tryhards everywhere. He stalks the web looking for retards to set straight. He can not be stopped by mere bans or thread locks for he shall rise anew.


Posted by: stuffedbean
You can not say a game is factually good or bad. What makes a game good is in the eye of the player playing it. What you may call a bad game, I may call a good game. What I may call a good game, you may call a bad game. It may have a lot of problems, but that does not make it a bad game for everyone. Take Oblivion for example.


You liking the game doesn't make it a good game.
It could be a bad game, but you could still like it.

Reach is a bad game.
Whether or not you like it is irrelevant.

  • 11.03.2011 5:27 PM PDT


Posted by: SouthPoIe

Posted by: stuffedbean
You can not say a game is factually good or bad. What makes a game good is in the eye of the player playing it. What you may call a bad game, I may call a good game. What I may call a good game, you may call a bad game. It may have a lot of problems, but that does not make it a bad game for everyone. Take Oblivion for example.


You liking the game doesn't make it a good game.
It could be a bad game, but you could still like it.

Reach is a bad game.
Whether or not you like it is irrelevant.


True my liking it does not make it a good game. However your not liking it does not make it a bad game. It just a game. It is up to the individual playing it to decide if it is good or bad for them.

  • 11.03.2011 5:29 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Level. Get on it.


Posted by: RC Clone
Nope. SouthPole isn't a person. He's the avatar of the force of tryhards everywhere. He stalks the web looking for retards to set straight. He can not be stopped by mere bans or thread locks for he shall rise anew.


Posted by: stuffedbean

However your not liking it does not make it a bad game. It just a game. It is up to the individual playing it to decide if it is good or bad for them.


It's not a bad game because I don't like it.
It's a bad game because it is ridiculously flawed.

  • 11.03.2011 5:32 PM PDT


Posted by: SouthPoIe

Posted by: stuffedbean

However your not liking it does not make it a bad game. It just a game. It is up to the individual playing it to decide if it is good or bad for them.


It's not a bad game because I don't like it.
It's a bad game because it is ridiculously flawed.


And for you that makes it bad. But not for everyone.

  • 11.03.2011 5:33 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Level. Get on it.


Posted by: RC Clone
Nope. SouthPole isn't a person. He's the avatar of the force of tryhards everywhere. He stalks the web looking for retards to set straight. He can not be stopped by mere bans or thread locks for he shall rise anew.


Posted by: stuffedbean


And for you that makes it bad. But not for everyone.


No, that makes it bad.
If an egg spoils, it is a bad egg.
Reach is broken, it is a bad game.

[Edited on 11.03.2011 5:36 PM PDT]

  • 11.03.2011 5:35 PM PDT

Member of team Master Theory.

17th Mythic Conqueror of Halo 3.
5th Mythic Conqueror of ODST.
If you would like to know more about Mythic difficulty please go to this thread. Thank you.

Please do not send me "recruitment messages" as I'm not interested in joining any groups currently.

I like Reach, but it is horribly flawed in some aspects and I know that I'd like it better if it wasn't as flawed.

  • 11.03.2011 6:02 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I'm new to competitive Halo and Halo itself (Reach being my first video game ever actually). Message me if you want to play;

Reach: MLG, Arena, Doubles, BTB and customs.
Halo 3: Ranked MM and customs.

Also I have every Halo title and all of its DLC on the Xbox 360.
-Umpa

Yet they like it enough to be a good player....

  • 11.03.2011 6:08 PM PDT


Posted by: SouthPoIe
When the good players have problems with it.
When a good player calls something unbalanced, it's unbalanced.
There isn't going to be the bias the bad players have.

Bad players often make up excuses as to why they're bad.
For example, the kids crying about the BR being overpowered/spammed.
There was nothing wrong with the BR. However, bad players didn't want to admit that they were bad, so they made excuses to make themselves feel better. They could have done this on purpose or subconsciously. I don't know.

Fact of the matter is, Reach is a bad game.

Discuss.


You Sir, just read my mind

  • 11.03.2011 6:24 PM PDT

Reach is a bad game in the Halo series. Otherwise, it's a good game.

People post this crap every day. Move on.

  • 11.03.2011 6:31 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3