- CrazzySnipe55
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
First, I'd like to thank you for the response. Second, who's to say when ad hominem becomes ad hominem ENOUGH for a ban. "You suck at sniping" is leaps and bounds behind "Your mother's a whore and you wear women's clothing."
Also, there is still a gray area in what is and is not a topic of discussion allowed in the Septagon. Discussing the community is a broad stroke to paint when making rules and regulations. And, as expected, the enforcement of locking off topic things is equally broad and varied in result and reason.
Finally, you didn't comment on how we can tell, definitively, if something is a political/religious thread. Please and thank you.
Posted by: snipe champpppp
Posted by: CrazzySnipe55
Everything I asked about is a rule. Tell me how you make them clear cut and objective.
Posted by: snipe champpppp
Posted by: CrazzySnipe55
Posted by: snipe champpppp
I just don't like how there is a grey area on where the mods can ban.
It should be clean cut, if you break the rules then you are banned. Not left for interpretation by moderator.Really? How do you make off topic threads clear cut? How do you make political threads clear cut? How do you make ad hominem offenses (being a jackass) clear cut? Once you call someone a dick, it's a ban?
If it is in the rules its a ban.
If not, then no ban.
Easy as that
No ad hominems, that's just childish. Call names and get into a piss fight? Ban. Take away the politic threads or just ban them on sight. Off topics belong in the Flood, if they are put anywhere else then ban.