Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Reach/CEA deserve a bigger lifespan
  • Subject: Reach/CEA deserve a bigger lifespan
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: Reach/CEA deserve a bigger lifespan

Harass the harassers.


Posted by: FLASHDENMARK

Posted by: Apocalypse
Reach deserves to die in a fire. Halo 4 can't come soon enough.
So do people that continue playing/frequenting forums for reach that dont like it.Even when 4 comes out,I have a bad feeling a bunch of bored whiney little -blam!-es are gonna do the same thing to 4 and its forums that has plauged reach and its forums.(people like you guys,copy and paste that)

  • 11.12.2011 2:38 PM PDT

Turn on, Tune in, Drop out

GT is fat aggre55ion


Posted by: FLASHDENMARK

Posted by: Apocalypse
Reach deserves to die in a fire. Halo 4 can't come soon enough.


Don't be so mean to Reach, it's sensitive you know.

Opinions are opinions. I think the made Reach into a ton of fun to play. Yeah it's not the same feeling as the previous and amazing H3, but it is still a great game.

I find Halo's situation much like Counter-Strike. When source came out it completely changed the feel of the game. I loved CS 1.0-1.6 and hated how they changed my beloved game. But it is still fun to play, I just wish CS 1.6 still had the population that Source does but oh well, what are you gonna do?

The great thing about all the Halo's is the re-play value is always gonna be there. Bungie did not ruin the franchise with Reach. Have fun and try not to focus on all the things you hate about Reach and have fun playing

  • 11.12.2011 2:42 PM PDT


Posted by: philisweatly

Posted by: FLASHDENMARK

Posted by: Apocalypse
Reach deserves to die in a fire. Halo 4 can't come soon enough.


Don't be so mean to Reach, it's sensitive you know.

Opinions are opinions. I think the made Reach into a ton of fun to play. Yeah it's not the same feeling as the previous and amazing H3, but it is still a great game.

I find Halo's situation much like Counter-Strike. When source came out it completely changed the feel of the game. I loved CS 1.0-1.6 and hated how they changed my beloved game. But it is still fun to play, I just wish CS 1.6 still had the population that Source does but oh well, what are you gonna do?

The great thing about all the Halo's is the re-play value is always gonna be there. Bungie did not ruin the franchise with Reach. Have fun and try not to focus on all the things you hate about Reach and have fun playing

You cant not focus on it when theres like 30 bad things and 2 good things.

  • 11.12.2011 2:46 PM PDT

WALL OF SHAME-Posting stupidity since 2010
__________________
Posted by: Maximus Decimus
Agreed. All the changes are good and add variety. Do we really want another Halo 3? Just running around with one gun and no armor abilities? It's good that 343 wants to try something new. Do we really want the same thing for three more games?


Posted by: A 3 Legged Goat
Halo 4 can't come fast enough.

  • 11.12.2011 3:39 PM PDT


Posted by: NavG123

Posted by: A 3 Legged Goat
Halo 4 can't come fast enough.

  • 11.12.2011 4:03 PM PDT

Posted by: philisweatly

Posted by: FLASHDENMARK

Posted by: Apocalypse
Reach deserves to die in a fire. Halo 4 can't come soon enough.


Don't be so mean to Reach, it's sensitive you know.

Opinions are opinions. I think the made Reach into a ton of fun to play. Yeah it's not the same feeling as the previous and amazing H3, but it is still a great game.

I find Halo's situation much like Counter-Strike. When source came out it completely changed the feel of the game. I loved CS 1.0-1.6 and hated how they changed my beloved game. But it is still fun to play, I just wish CS 1.6 still had the population that Source does but oh well, what are you gonna do?

The great thing about all the Halo's is the re-play value is always gonna be there. Bungie did not ruin the franchise with Reach. Have fun and try not to focus on all the things you hate about Reach and have fun playing

Halo: Reach for me is alright. Not liking the Campaign though. Just didn't have that 'Halo' feeling like Halo 3, Halo 2, and Halo: CE. But I do like the Multiplayer.

  • 11.12.2011 4:12 PM PDT


Posted by: A 3 Legged Goat
Halo 4 can't come fast enough.

  • 11.12.2011 4:15 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Lol I will get hce only when assault rifle starts are abolished and never brought back in the classic playlists. Dmr/magnum starts STANDARD

[Edited on 11.12.2011 4:25 PM PST]

  • 11.12.2011 4:24 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member

The Work Place - Executive Director
* ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED *
A Kodak moment :: You demand proof, and required the photo evidence of said event


Posted by: eRage Sanctity
Not when the multiplayer is a colossal failure.


Yeah, over 3,000 games is a colossal failure. Keep playing.

  • 11.12.2011 4:26 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

my gt is Godzillla....i just didnt link it properly

a year later reach doesnt have near the fire halo3 did ..its not even a real halo game if you think about it..im eager to see the bungie newness and the what 343 does from here on out

  • 11.12.2011 5:17 PM PDT

I loved reach. I love how it was such a tragedy. Ever move you made the covenent beat it. Perfect way to show reaches fall. The music also set the depresing scene very well for me. However i do hop on the "omgtipofthespearsidemissionbull-blam!-" train. Other then that every mission was great. This is easy for me though since i only bought halos for the campains so i cant appreciate the difference between reach and the other halos multiplayers.

As for why halo 3 dominated so much, i do agree that it had a lot to do with timing. Some of those other games were good but not in such a climactic posision as halo 3 was and needed time to evolve.

Personally i think you can blame a good chunk of halos death to MW2. MW2 set the bar to a stupid level that halo is struggling to reach (no pun intended). MW2 gave black ops the head start over reach as most people hoped it would be just as good.

So yes, i think reach is great but just has way too much competition and is why it's not as loved as halo 3 was.

  • 11.12.2011 5:48 PM PDT


Posted by: scoutt

Posted by: eRage Sanctity
Not when the multiplayer is a colossal failure.


Yeah, over 3,000 games is a colossal failure. Keep playing.

Does everyone always have to clear this up?

Its a colossal failure as a Halo title.

  • 11.12.2011 5:49 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

GrownPrism is NOT my gt. Happened when signing into my xbox live account. My real gt is here:

http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Reach/Default.aspx?player=SYNTHES lS&sg=0


Posted by: eRage Sanctity
Not when the multiplayer is a colossal failure.

  • 11.12.2011 5:59 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

GrownPrism is NOT my gt. Happened when signing into my xbox live account. My real gt is here:

http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Reach/Default.aspx?player=SYNTHES lS&sg=0

For the whole "more competition argument". The number of xbox live members has nearly tripled since Halo 3 so more games shouldn't be a valid excuse as there are more people to play different games.

[Edited on 11.12.2011 6:02 PM PST]

  • 11.12.2011 6:02 PM PDT

Harass the harassers.


Posted by: eRage Sanctity

Posted by: scoutt

Posted by: eRage Sanctity
Not when the multiplayer is a colossal failure.


Yeah, over 3,000 games is a colossal failure. Keep playing.

Does everyone always have to clear this up?

Its a colossal failure as a Halo title.
The reason you keep having to explain that one rage is that it makes very little if any sense that someone would have such a low opinion of somthing that they invest so much time in.Im not sure the same logic could be applied elsewhere in life without the same additude being considered absurd.

  • 11.12.2011 6:02 PM PDT


Posted by: CaptKrunch 96
For the whole "more competition argument". The number of xbox live members has nearly tripled since Halo 3 so more games shouldn't be a valid excuse as there are more people to play different games.

Nope its just coincidence that Reach is the lowest out of all the top shooters and is lower than a -blam!- poverty ball game.

  • 11.12.2011 6:03 PM PDT


Posted by: Plunderfuq

Posted by: eRage Sanctity

Posted by: scoutt

Posted by: eRage Sanctity
Not when the multiplayer is a colossal failure.


Yeah, over 3,000 games is a colossal failure. Keep playing.

Does everyone always have to clear this up?

Its a colossal failure as a Halo title.
The reason you keep having to explain that one rage is that it makes very little if any sense that someone would have such a low opinion of somthing that they invest so much time in.Im not sure the same logic could be applied elsewhere in life without the same additude being considered absurd.

Well I guess its a good thing that I have enough games played to make a very experienced statement then.

  • 11.12.2011 6:04 PM PDT


Posted by: eRage Sanctity
Lol its so funny how nobody wants to admit bungie screwed up. The population is already at an all time low, and if Halo was still as good as it used to be it wouldnt have left the top 3.


lolDefendingReach

  • 11.12.2011 6:05 PM PDT

Harass the harassers.


Posted by: CaptKrunch 96
For the whole "more competition argument". The number of xbox live members has nearly tripled since Halo 3 so more games shouldn't be a valid excuse as there are more people to play different games.
The amount of good games has increased 20 fold if not more,that would lead one to beleive (if they were thinking subjectivly)that Reach has maintained an amazing ability to retain marketshare.

  • 11.12.2011 6:05 PM PDT

Harass the harassers.


Posted by: eRage Sanctity

Posted by: Plunderfuq

Posted by: eRage Sanctity

Posted by: scoutt

Posted by: eRage Sanctity
Not when the multiplayer is a colossal failure.


Yeah, over 3,000 games is a colossal failure. Keep playing.

Does everyone always have to clear this up?

Its a colossal failure as a Halo title.
The reason you keep having to explain that one rage is that it makes very little if any sense that someone would have such a low opinion of somthing that they invest so much time in.Im not sure the same logic could be applied elsewhere in life without the same additude being considered absurd.

Well I guess its a good thing that I have enough games played to make a very experienced statement then.
When do you think you will finally come to a conclusion,november 2012?

  • 11.12.2011 6:07 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

We're getting seven oldass maps everybody's played on, and a recycled oldass campaign we've all played through more than once.

How can this be at all exciting to you?

  • 11.12.2011 6:07 PM PDT

November 20th, 2011.

  • 11.12.2011 6:07 PM PDT

Harass the harassers.


Posted by: eRage Sanctity
November 20th, 2011.
Im gonna miss you.

  • 11.12.2011 6:09 PM PDT


Posted by: Plunderfuq

Posted by: eRage Sanctity
November 20th, 2011.
Im gonna miss you.

Im not leaving. The Classic playlist will show if 343 managed to unlock this games massive potential. If its a letdown, then well, I havent even played Reach in like 5 days.

  • 11.12.2011 6:10 PM PDT

Harass the harassers.


Posted by: eRage Sanctity

Posted by: Plunderfuq

Posted by: eRage Sanctity
November 20th, 2011.
Im gonna miss you.

Im not leaving. The Classic playlist will show if 343 managed to unlock this games massive potential. If its a letdown, then well, I havent even played Reach in like 5 days.
Well one can only hope it lives up to your standards.

  • 11.12.2011 6:12 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3