Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Reach>MW3
  • Subject: Reach>MW3
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: Reach>MW3


Posted by: And Im Here Too
Posted by: AK FROST

Posted by: And Im Here Too
Posted by: AK FROST
Op Reach is the worst game in history you mad?


So, wait, you think ET, Superman 64, and Red Riding Hood were better?

Leave. NOW.


Halo History oh yea I threw a curveball.


I hope you mean Multiplayer-wise.

Campaign-wise, Halo 2 was garbage.


Of course I mean multiplayer wise. Some piss in your shreddies this morning?

  • 11.15.2011 5:30 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: And Im Here Too
Hold up...I was talking about MW3's gameplay, not its popularity. It's obvious the typical COD idiot will buy it anyway, but that doesn't change the fact that they might as well have rereleased MW2 and taped a ".5" at the end.


Ok ... so we should take your single unsubstantiated opinion/rant over the buyng and playing power of millions of people.

Even if %50 of those people are idoits - and you not [no proof yet] - it still one hell of a lot more people betting against you.

  • 11.15.2011 5:39 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Posted by: Separikakku

And, believe me, I never - not once started to care what "they" think. :)

  • 11.15.2011 5:44 AM PDT

The Halo series was my first and favorite FPS series.
I enjoy most games throughout all systems despite what some people say.

Oh, and on the forums, I tell it like it is, like it or not.

Any game>MW3.

That's a fact.

  • 11.15.2011 5:50 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Posted by: golffore297
Any game>MW3.

That's a fact.


Even ET?

Yeah, probably.

  • 11.15.2011 5:50 AM PDT

The Halo series was my first and favorite FPS series.
I enjoy most games throughout all systems despite what some people say.

Oh, and on the forums, I tell it like it is, like it or not.


Posted by: And Im Here Too
Posted by: golffore297
Any game>MW3.

That's a fact.


Even ET?

Yeah, probably.


Hmm.....I didn't think about that one.

Probably worst game of all time vs. MW3. That's a difficult question....

Yea, I'm with you, I'm gonna go with ET.

  • 11.15.2011 5:55 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Noble Heroic Member
  • gamertag: cj1b4u
  • user homepage:


Posted by: And Im Here Too
There is no Modern Warfare 3, it's just Modern Warfare 2.5.

lol ^this

  • 11.15.2011 6:22 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: DarQslide
This is what makes me chuckle... people KNOW that they are just buying an updated version of the same game... and they eat it up with a spoon. Unbelievable.


But isn't that the exact same thing CEA is doing? They put a new shinny skin on it and you bought it.

  • 11.15.2011 6:54 AM PDT

Frank O'Connor said he doesn't think the Halo series needs to be taken in a radical new direction... it just needs to go "deeper"

"Ultimately the core game mechanic and strength of the universe doesn't need to be changed, it just needs to be taken deeper. We want to make Halo games - we don't want to make Call of Duty or Ridge Racer. We want to make Halo games because we understand what's special about Halo."

Posted by: And Im Here Too
There is no Modern Warfare 3, it's just Modern Warfare 2.5.

Yeah, and MW2 was actually MW 1.5, so MW2 did never came to existance.

Your logic is so stupid.

Exept, if the game has better graphics but the exact same gameplay and missions.

Halo CEA is actually Halo CE.5 :D

[Edited on 11.15.2011 7:05 AM PST]

  • 11.15.2011 7:02 AM PDT

Halo:Reach is the best fps ever!!!


Posted by: Sniper199
Why does there always have to be a competition? They are both great games but honestly, nobody really plays Reach anymore.
Why are you in this forum?

  • 11.15.2011 7:12 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Noble Heroic Member
  • gamertag: cj1b4u
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Team Classic
Posted by: And Im Here Too
There is no Modern Warfare 3, it's just Modern Warfare 2.5.

Yeah, and MW2 was actually MW 1.5, so MW2 did never came to existance.

Your logic is so stupid.

Exept, if the game has better graphics but the exact same gameplay and missions.

Halo CEA is actually Halo CE.5 :D


but CEA wasn't advertised as a new game... it was advertised as a remake.

  • 11.15.2011 7:14 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: cj1b4u

Posted by: Team Classic
Posted by: And Im Here Too
There is no Modern Warfare 3, it's just Modern Warfare 2.5.

Yeah, and MW2 was actually MW 1.5, so MW2 did never came to existance.

Your logic is so stupid.

Exept, if the game has better graphics but the exact same gameplay and missions.

Halo CEA is actually Halo CE.5 :D


but CEA wasn't advertised as a new game... it was advertised as a remake.


Honestly, I don't are because hands down, MW3 has brought back the meaning of gaming. I can sit down when I have nothing to do and entertain myself, when I did this with Reach I might be able to last 3-4 games before getting so bored I'd rather go cleanup then game.

  • 11.15.2011 7:22 AM PDT

Chill bro. Be a little more literate when reading. :D It was his opinion that CoD players are idiots. He never said it was a proven fact. Whats more is, He used idiot to generalize and clump together a large portion of people, there for, the meaning of the word used is susceptible to change and likely holds no relevancy in the discussion what so ever. :]

By the way, Don't insult a mini-rant for being a mini-rant with a mini-rant. That makes you look like part of OP's generalized group. :D

Also, I wasn't aware we got past CoD:MW :O

-FFFFUUUU

  • 11.15.2011 7:23 AM PDT

This sig will Self-Destruct in 3.... 2.... 1.... Thank you for your time. Cookie?

Personally speaking, I prefer all the Halos over all of the Modern Warfares.

Objectively speaking, they appeal to different demographics and different styles of play, so its about as fair a competition as trying to ask which is better between Final Fantasy VI and Assassin's Creed 2, so we should all shut up and realize that some people will prefer Halo over CoD, CoD over Halo, and Battlefield over both, because they're all different in the way they work.

  • 11.15.2011 7:49 AM PDT

Sir Arch-Duke Ferdinand II Jr. Sr. III Phd.

CEA was advertised as a remake, not a sequel. Every Halo sequel has had innovations that set it apart from its predecessors (and divided its fanbase). CoD games are advertised as sequels but all play the exact same. The developers never take any risks.

But then again why change the formula if it's worked fine for you all these years? Maybe Bungie was being too innovative and changing things merely for the sake of change all these years

  • 11.15.2011 8:22 AM PDT

When your right, nobody remembers. When your wrong, nobody forgets.

The PC Version of MW3 has like a 1.9 LOL

  • 11.15.2011 8:32 AM PDT

It seems that you're mad.

Understandable.

I would be mad too if I couldn't understand half of the words the other person was saying.


Posted by: golffore297
Any game>MW3.

That's a fact.

  • 11.15.2011 8:35 AM PDT

"The Septagon symbolizes all that is right in the multiplayer world. A few million men and women, bound by honor, Bungie, and celebratory crouching."

6th... smh

  • 11.15.2011 8:50 AM PDT

-blam!- Was that actually blammed out? Or did I just type it? You'll never know.

Well it depends if you like fun or not.

  • 11.15.2011 8:59 AM PDT

chances are I don't care who you are or what you say.

opinion

Everything is an opinion

  • 11.15.2011 9:01 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Banned just for calling someone retarded? lolBnet mods
Duardo = retard

So you think Reach is an actual Halo game, huh? LOL
Jesus! There's a BoB in ma Falcon!

Oh, were still talking about this?

*yawn*

  • 11.15.2011 9:06 AM PDT


Posted by: RustedEdge
lolmetacritic

  • 11.15.2011 9:17 AM PDT

Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.

Popularity does not equal quality. Critics are not always right, but they tend to (or at least should) rate games objectively across a spectrum of criteria, one of which should be innovation. Both of these games are sequels so neither is very rich in innovation, but they are both pretty polished by now.

I like both games. A rating of 9.5 vs. 9.0 is not very different in my book.

  • 11.15.2011 9:24 AM PDT

I want my elephant back.
Give it to me now!
(Please?)

Me.

lol


Posted by: x4m d1eG0
Skyrim > All

I haven't played it yet.

  • 11.16.2011 5:27 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3