Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Look how far Halo has fallen.
  • Subject: Look how far Halo has fallen.
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Look how far Halo has fallen.
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Imprisoned for ten thousand years... Banished from my own home land... And now you DARE enter my realm? You are not prepared.

YOU ARE NOT PREPARED!

Do you all remember, before Halo Reach, when Halo 3 was the top played XBL game.. every month? Halo 3 was at the top for 2 full years, until CoD MW2 came around, and as it was new it took the lead.

People said that it was only because it was new, and that when Halo Reach was released Halo would be back at the top.

..Well, of course, that did not happen. Last year both MW2 and Black Ops kept coming out on top.

Now.. look at the recent list: here.

It is 8th. Being beaten by Single player games like Skyrim, and other games like FIFA 12. Not only this, but it is being beaten by 3 Call of Duty games now.

Just goes to show how much of a failure Halo Reach truly was.

[Edited on 11.16.2011 3:58 PM PST]

  • 11.16.2011 3:57 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

lolReach!

  • 11.16.2011 3:58 PM PDT

R.I.P. Halo 2 <33333333
Do not play halo much anymore. Barely ever come on here.

Halo has gone downhill after halo 3.

  • 11.16.2011 3:58 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Horse Repairman
RC RuNz the internet. Like the superintendent.

Posted by: SouthPoIe
Clone is an internet God.

Posted by: DerpRoids
RC Clone is the anti-thesis of a lurker.

A little late there buddy.

  • 11.16.2011 3:59 PM PDT

i am myself

but...skyrim is much better than reach!!

  • 11.16.2011 3:59 PM PDT

How many people that play a game doesn't determine its success. Personally, I feel that a game is a success if people enjoy playing it. While most of us on the forums dislike Reach, most people enjoy it, so it's a success in my eyes.

  • 11.16.2011 3:59 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Horse Repairman
RC RuNz the internet. Like the superintendent.

Posted by: SouthPoIe
Clone is an internet God.

Posted by: DerpRoids
RC Clone is the anti-thesis of a lurker.

Posted by: RtG ryan 69
Halo has gone downhill after halo 3.

You accidentally hit 3 instead of 2.

  • 11.16.2011 3:59 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: jgman676
How many people that play a game doesn't determine its success. Personally, I feel that a game is a success if people enjoy playing it. While most of us on the forums dislike Reach, most people enjoy it, so it's a success in my eyes.
Seriously?

  • 11.16.2011 4:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Imprisoned for ten thousand years... Banished from my own home land... And now you DARE enter my realm? You are not prepared.

YOU ARE NOT PREPARED!


Posted by: jgman676
How many people that play a game doesn't determine its success. Personally, I feel that a game is a success if people enjoy playing it. While most of us on the forums dislike Reach, most people enjoy it, so it's a success in my eyes.


If most people enjoy it.. why isn't it more played?

Your reasoning really makes no sense. So if someone likes a game, it is a success? Looks like Train Simulator 2011 is a success because there are a few people who enjoy it.

  • 11.16.2011 4:01 PM PDT


Posted by: IllidanStormrage

Posted by: jgman676
How many people that play a game doesn't determine its success. Personally, I feel that a game is a success if people enjoy playing it. While most of us on the forums dislike Reach, most people enjoy it, so it's a success in my eyes.


If most people enjoy it.. why isn't it more played?

Your reasoning really makes no sense. So if someone likes a game, it is a success? Looks like Train Simulator 2011 is a success because there are a few people who enjoy it.


It's a success to those few people. Are you saying that they don't matter?

  • 11.16.2011 4:01 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Zaxari
  • user homepage:


Posted by: jgman676
How many people that play a game doesn't determine its success. Personally, I feel that a game is a success if people enjoy playing it. While most of us on the forums dislike Reach, most people enjoy it, so it's a success in my eyes.

O_o OMFG! This forum does have reasonable people! You are the light among this dark hell hole! *Starts parade*

  • 11.16.2011 4:02 PM PDT

New Zealand is pretty much the best place in the world.

http://www.youtube.com/user/8Donny8?feature=mhee

YEEEEEAAAAAHHH!!!!


Posted by: Lord Donny
cant wait till its 8rd, 8rd's my fave number


  • 11.16.2011 4:03 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Imprisoned for ten thousand years... Banished from my own home land... And now you DARE enter my realm? You are not prepared.

YOU ARE NOT PREPARED!


Posted by: jgman676

Posted by: IllidanStormrage

Posted by: jgman676
How many people that play a game doesn't determine its success. Personally, I feel that a game is a success if people enjoy playing it. While most of us on the forums dislike Reach, most people enjoy it, so it's a success in my eyes.


If most people enjoy it.. why isn't it more played?

Your reasoning really makes no sense. So if someone likes a game, it is a success? Looks like Train Simulator 2011 is a success because there are a few people who enjoy it.


It's a success to those few people. Are you saying that they don't matter?


They can like the game, sure. Is it successful just because some people like it? No.

  • 11.16.2011 4:04 PM PDT


Posted by: IllidanStormrage

Posted by: jgman676

Posted by: IllidanStormrage

Posted by: jgman676
How many people that play a game doesn't determine its success. Personally, I feel that a game is a success if people enjoy playing it. While most of us on the forums dislike Reach, most people enjoy it, so it's a success in my eyes.


If most people enjoy it.. why isn't it more played?

Your reasoning really makes no sense. So if someone likes a game, it is a success? Looks like Train Simulator 2011 is a success because there are a few people who enjoy it.


It's a success to those few people. Are you saying that they don't matter?


They can like the game, sure. Is it successful just because some people like it? No.


I see your point. However, just because a game has a small fanbase doesn't make it any less of a success.

[Edited on 11.16.2011 4:06 PM PST]

  • 11.16.2011 4:06 PM PDT

Yeah thats sad alrite, makes me wonder what would have happened if they had just released H3 with better graphics COD style

  • 11.16.2011 4:07 PM PDT

Trying hard or hardly trying?

GT: oxI Sonic Ixo

I understand reach is a failure in many of your eyes but damn do I prefer its online multiplayer over MW2.5. Although some skill has left our beloved franchise, its still one of the most skilled shooters on the console market.

As for its XBL standing, there are so many quality titles out these days. I remember when the original xbox had so few quality titles. Halo was the best and most preferred from your mech assault to your splinter cell. Now we have tons and tons of titles to play. Especially around the holidays is where we get drowned.

You never might know, if halo 4 brings back what is best for halo and not try to hard to change to make dollars, Halo may once again be the top dog.

[Edited on 11.16.2011 4:07 PM PST]

  • 11.16.2011 4:07 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: jgman676
I see your point. However, just because a game has a small fanbase doesn't make it any less of a success.
Which is more successful: A game with a MP population of 10,000 or one with a population of +100,000?

  • 11.16.2011 4:10 PM PDT

It's as simple as this: if a game is not entertaining, people will not play it.

  • 11.16.2011 4:12 PM PDT


Posted by: IllidanStormrage

Posted by: jgman676

Posted by: IllidanStormrage

Posted by: jgman676
How many people that play a game doesn't determine its success. Personally, I feel that a game is a success if people enjoy playing it. While most of us on the forums dislike Reach, most people enjoy it, so it's a success in my eyes.


If most people enjoy it.. why isn't it more played?

Your reasoning really makes no sense. So if someone likes a game, it is a success? Looks like Train Simulator 2011 is a success because there are a few people who enjoy it.


It's a success to those few people. Are you saying that they don't matter?


They can like the game, sure. Is it successful just because some people like it? No.


guys a game can succeed in 2 ways:
people who playing the game(the company made a game that people actually enjoy playing;company and people succeeds)

game is played by a lot of people and it is popular (company succeeds by making a ton of money and a good reputation; company succeeds)

  • 11.16.2011 4:13 PM PDT


Posted by: Boomdeyadahh
Posted by: jgman676
I see your point. However, just because a game has a small fanbase doesn't make it any less of a success.
Which is more successful: A game with a MP population of 10,000 or one with a population of +100,000?


From a business perspective, the one that has 100,000+. From a gamer's perspective, it's whichever they enjoy more.

Also, quantity =/= quality.

  • 11.16.2011 4:15 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Zaxari
  • user homepage:


*edit* Fix'd wrong quote
Posted by: Boomdeyadahh
Posted by: jgman676
I see your point. However, just because a game has a small fanbase doesn't make it any less of a success.
Which is more successful: A game with a MP population of 10,000 or one with a population of +100,000?

Well seeing that Reach has a 200,00+ MP population on the week ends and a 100,00+ on the weekdays, it seems it's a success in your standards.

[Edited on 11.16.2011 4:29 PM PST]

  • 11.16.2011 4:15 PM PDT


Posted by: Zaxari

Posted by: MarkFanous

Posted by: IllidanStormrage

Posted by: jgman676

Posted by: IllidanStormrage

[quote]Posted by: jgman676
How many people that play a game doesn't determine its success. Personally, I feel that a game is a success if people enjoy playing it. While most of us on the forums dislike Reach, most people enjoy it, so it's a success in my eyes.


If most people enjoy it.. why isn't it more played?

Your reasoning really makes no sense. So if someone likes a game, it is a success? Looks like Train Simulator 2011 is a success because there are a few people who enjoy it.


It's a success to those few people. Are you saying that they don't matter?


guys a game can succeed in 2 ways:
people who playing the game(the company made a game that people actually enjoy playing;company and people succeeds)

game is played by a lot of people and it is popular (company succeeds by making a ton of money and a good reputation; company succeeds)

Well seeing that Reach has a 200,00+ MP population on the week ends and a 100,00+ on the weekdays, it seems it's a success in your standards.


And that's at any given time. It usually gathers about 500,000 unique users every day, it's just down because of all of the really anticipated games that just released.

  • 11.16.2011 4:18 PM PDT

Sincerely, the voice inside your head for whenever you read things.

Seriously? Skyrim at #7?! It should be number 1!

  • 11.16.2011 4:24 PM PDT

I want my elephant back.
Give it to me now!
(Please?)

Me.

lol

But yet, his last game to play was Reach.

/ironic

  • 11.16.2011 4:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Imprisoned for ten thousand years... Banished from my own home land... And now you DARE enter my realm? You are not prepared.

YOU ARE NOT PREPARED!


Posted by: Mr Extremer22
But yet, his last game to play was Reach.

/ironic


What..? My gamertag isn't even linked.

  • 11.16.2011 4:31 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2