Bungie Universe
This topic has moved here: Subject: Why did 343 industries are BAD!!!
  • Subject: Why did 343 industries are BAD!!!
Subject: Why did 343 industries are BAD!!!
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Jordan Payne

343 industries made multiplayer exactly the same as halo reach like WTH!!! but anyway the even worse part about it is they didnt even allow you to use the maps from halo reach which bungie created. I think that if they want to make halo games well dont F**k it up. I rest my case

  • 11.17.2011 12:39 AM PDT

omg hai!! :DDDD
<33

it is the saim multiplayer!! :D
and cant you just use your reach disc the the maps? :c

  • 11.17.2011 12:52 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Jordan Payne

Bungie are alot more organized and better at making halo fun but the only thing 343 industries did good was the campaign but they really let me down by making the multiplayer because you cant even use the reach maps. The only maps you can use are their maps which are s**t. Sorry but its true.

  • 11.17.2011 1:03 AM PDT

Brains beats brawn get used to it

Fear the Red Comet

Variety is the spice of life.
Long live games.
Death to all fanboys.


Posted by: Jordan Payne
Bungie are alot more organized and better at making halo fun but the only thing 343 industries did good was the campaign but they really let me down by making the multiplayer because you cant even use the reach maps. The only maps you can use are their maps which are s**t. Sorry but its true.


So basically your only complaint stems from a feature that works exactly as its supposed to, and has been revealed in full for what it's supposed to be months in advance. Right...

Also lol...."their" maps? Certain Affinity made those maps, not 343i, and guess what. The people that make up Certain Affinity are the same people that designed those maps in the original in the first place when they were still at Bungie. If you want to complain, go blame the right party.

  • 11.17.2011 1:12 AM PDT


Posted by: Jordan Payne
343 industries made multiplayer exactly the same as halo reach like WTH!!! but anyway the even worse part about it is they didnt even allow you to use the maps from halo reach which bungie created. I think that if they want to make halo games well dont F**k it up. I rest my case


Why you fail:

1: There is something called Anniversary Slayer/Objectives. Which basically is just the Reach multiplayer suite and graphics (nothing wrong with!) without the AA's, and with old skool Pistol, jumpheight, walking speed and the exact classic maps.

2: You can use the maps of Reach as well. Just install the maps to your HDD and play from the Reach disk. The choice to only include the Anniversary part of multi on the CEA disk is actually a good one. It makes the CEA multi semi-standalone and means you will only play with people who have these maps and want to play these maps.

  • 11.17.2011 1:15 AM PDT

Don't -blam!- with Kerser!

Read your first sentence.

You idiot! It isn't a new game you ignorant -blam!-. Those are new maps made for Halo: Reach. It wasn't supposed to be a new multiplayer.

  • 11.17.2011 1:26 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Jordan Payne

Who is the idiot?

  • 11.17.2011 1:34 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Jordan Payne

No s**t but they should have made there own multiplayer and not used bungies just cause there too stupid + lazy to come up with their own + you get bored of the same multiplayer.

  • 11.17.2011 1:37 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Jordan Payne

Thats if you were following the coments (Steroidkloud)we were talking about they should have made new multiplayer not talking about it being a new game IDIOT xD

  • 11.17.2011 1:40 AM PDT


Posted by: Jordan Payne
No s**t but they should have made there own multiplayer and not used bungies just cause there too stupid + lazy to come up with their own + you get bored of the same multiplayer.


1: Another multiplayer would split the Halo community. How they did it now means the community stays intact in one game, plus means you can easily switch from Classic mode to Reach mode without having to change disks... = easier and better.

2: Again: the Anniversary playlists play just like the classic CE and H2 did...and they feel like a standalone part of the multiplayer because of that. So in a way they did create a new space within multiplayer.

3: The new playlists and maps are better than what Reach had before, and they actually make Reach more fun again. Meaning you will play Reach more often.

343i is not stupid, nor lazy. They made deliberate choices that you fail to understand. Also, it seems pretty obvious you have barely touched the CEA multiplayer so far. Matter of fact: your gamertag shows you haven't even touched it...so that sort of makes your whole rant irrelevant as you don't even know what you're talking about my friend....

  • 11.17.2011 1:44 AM PDT

Don't -blam!- with Kerser!

Posted by: Jordan Payne
Thats if you were following the coments (Steroidkloud)we were talking about they should have made new multiplayer not talking about it being a new game IDIOT xD


Go back and look, was talking about a new game? No. So what the -blam!- are you going on about? I already said. They were always going to make it with Reach's multiplayer. If they made it with a new one, these things would have happened:

1. It would take most of the players from Reach which Bungie just release, that isn't fair on Bungie or the people looking for players to play Reach.

2. You would only have 6 maps.

3. They wouldn't be able to give you firefight because they would have had to re-code everything; the engine, the A.i, the weapons... Every single thing. You would't get that done in such a short amount of time. Also, if they were doing that, they wouldn't have been working on Halo: Anniversary at all.

4. If they made a new "Multiplayer" it would be the 5th game in a row to be released within on year.

5. The game would be a waste of development time on Halo 4 and Halo 4 would be crap.

6. If they managed to avoid all of the above, it would have been a waste of effort because the game wouldn't last a year anyway with Halo 4 being released in less than a year.

7. Problem?

  • 11.17.2011 1:56 AM PDT


Posted by: DonVinzone1

Posted by: Jordan Payne
No s**t but they should have made there own multiplayer and not used bungies just cause there too stupid + lazy to come up with their own + you get bored of the same multiplayer.


1: Another multiplayer would split the Halo community. How they did it now means the community stays intact in one game, plus means you can easily switch from Classic mode to Reach mode without having to change disks... = easier and better.

2: Again: the Anniversary playlists play just like the classic CE and H2 did...and they feel like a standalone part of the multiplayer because of that. So in a way they did create a new space within multiplayer.

3: The new playlists and maps are better than what Reach had before, and they actually make Reach more fun again. Meaning you will play Reach more often.

343i is not stupid, nor lazy. They made deliberate choices that you fail to understand. Also, it seems pretty obvious you have barely touched the CEA multiplayer so far. Matter of fact: your gamertag shows you haven't even touched it...so that sort of makes your whole rant irrelevant as you don't even know what you're talking about my friend....


I wouldn't bother with this one. As you said, he's never touched CEA (therefore, troll), and second, from his... less then adequate grammar he's probably 8.

I'm not usually a grammar whore, but that was painful to read.

  • 11.17.2011 4:20 AM PDT