Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Quality of Halo anniversary as compared to original Halo 1 game
  • Subject: Quality of Halo anniversary as compared to original Halo 1 game
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: Quality of Halo anniversary as compared to original Halo 1 game

-Bungie All Star Nameplate Winner
-Forgehub: Hub of the Dead III Winner
-Custom Games host for TheHaloForgeEpidemic
-Halotracks: ex staff

"In peace the sons bury their fathers, but in war the fathers bury their sons." -Croesus

-343 Industries is in charge of Halo: CEA and all other Halo projects.

-Reach multiplayer was used for the game because the Halo: CE engine would not be able to withstand online sessions. The game wouldn't physically work. Of course gameplay will be different.

  • 11.22.2011 5:01 PM PDT

Ok, i made the changes like you said. Now i duely addressed the fact that 343 is in charge now, but also addressed bungie since they originally made these mistakes, and 343 actually made them better, but not better enough. 343 actually did improve these things, but they were so bad off from bungie, that it wasn't good enough. For example, punching was much worse in Halo reach, but it still is a nuance that people take advantage of by punching in midair while jumping off cliffs. So, these mistakes actually apply even more to your company, bungie, although they do also apply to 343.

  • 11.22.2011 5:06 PM PDT

He who cannot command himself should obey. And many can command themselves, but much is still lacking before they can obey themselves.
--Thus Spoke Zarathustra


Posted by: Achronos
Bungie employees such as myself regularly read the forums. However, your complaints about Halo Anniversary's multiplayer are misdirected. Bungie was not involved in the creation of Halo Aniversary (you'll note that our logo is not on the box anywhere, for example) - we also didn't make the multiplayer maps or the anniversary gametype settings.

You should probably be engaging 343i, as they are the stewards of Halo now.

Posted by: ReachForCheapWep
Anyways, I posted this so people could comment or argue with me which none of you have. Go away, if you are just going to tell me im wrong and not tell me why. Oh and also, is there a way of sending bungie this feedback? I think they need to understand what they did wrong.

Great work exploiting the once beloved Halo series right into the ground. Zzzzing!

  • 11.22.2011 5:19 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

t3hAvenger77 - XBL (BF3, ME3, Blops)
decla1mer104 - Origin (BF3)
Steam

RIP paragraphs.

  • 11.22.2011 5:23 PM PDT

Halo 3: ReV Eskimo

eventually ill be back on Reach and CEA. i enjoy gaming for fun, im a great player and i enjoy smoking while i play. so any chill players feel free to add me. I in NO way support halocharts; old username.

sniffle sniffle, whine whine.

  • 11.22.2011 5:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

t3hAvenger77 - XBL (BF3, ME3, Blops)
decla1mer104 - Origin (BF3)
Steam

Posted by: HC WhiteRabbit
sniffle sniffle, whine whine.
That's the Reach forum, comrade.

  • 11.22.2011 5:31 PM PDT

Who's got AIDS?


Posted by: Achronos
Bungie employees such as myself regularly read the forums. However, your complaints about Halo Anniversary's multiplayer are misdirected. Bungie was not involved in the creation of Halo Aniversary (you'll note that our logo is not on the box anywhere, for example) - we also didn't make the multiplayer maps or the anniversary gametype settings.

You should probably be engaging 343i, as they are the stewards of Halo now.

Posted by: ReachForCheapWep
Anyways, I posted this so people could comment or argue with me which none of you have. Go away, if you are just going to tell me im wrong and not tell me why. Oh and also, is there a way of sending bungie this feedback? I think they need to understand what they did wrong.

A wild Bungie employee appeared!

  • 11.22.2011 6:07 PM PDT

It's not whining, everything i said is a valid point, i dont just randomly complain. thats why i asked how to give feedback...

  • 11.23.2011 10:50 PM PDT

..And I'm gonna round my f.ucks given up to 0.


Posted by: Achronos
Bungie employees such as myself regularly read the forums. However, your complaints about Halo Anniversary's multiplayer are misdirected. Bungie was not involved in the creation of Halo Aniversary (you'll note that our logo is not on the box anywhere, for example) - we also didn't make the multiplayer maps or the anniversary gametype settings.

You should probably be engaging 343i, as they are the stewards of Halo now.

Posted by: ReachForCheapWep
Anyways, I posted this so people could comment or argue with me which none of you have. Go away, if you are just going to tell me im wrong and not tell me why. Oh and also, is there a way of sending bungie this feedback? I think they need to understand what they did wrong.

your on here alot more now huh?
not that its a bad thing.

  • 11.23.2011 10:57 PM PDT

Fear the Probulator. Looking at my stats I see, well go ahead.

-Your wall of text needs to be fixed.

-343i is doing all thing Halo, Bungie has moved on. (You should to) Go to Waypoint forums.

-Bungie made Halo CE(via 2001), 343i took that and repainted for Halo CEA(via 2011). A = Anniversay, meaning 10 ten years later.

-Because bunige did not have anything to do with making Halo CEA, that is why the box carries no Company Logo. The book does because the underlying game (Halo CE via 2001) was made by the bungie team of 2001. Must give credit to those who orginally made Halo Ce.

-Reach can never equal the "Feel" of Halo CE multiplayer because it is not Halo Ce. Reach is almost completely different when compaired to Halo CE, or even the other 2 Halo games. No matter what settings or "fixes", it will never equal it.

-/Facebanana

[Edited on 11.24.2011 10:11 AM PST]

  • 11.24.2011 12:06 AM PDT

How I kill? Simple effective Head shots and Beat downs. My newest favorite saying? Bullet meet head, head meet bullet. I would love to say this to a current telemarketer. I now have come up with Operation Laser. Operation Laser is the basis of basic lasering. Spartan Lasers ftw!

Hold on a second. OP, you don't really make a valid argument, all you are doing right now is complaining to people who moved past the Halo series. And if it is so cheap like you say it is, then why do you continue to play it?

The reason I say this is simple:
1. (granted you can do this but still) Your Bungie.net username.

2. No one cares about Onyx. It's like saying 'Hey look an Inheritor!', and if you truly think Reach is so cheap, why did you go to the trouble to get to Onyx in the first place?

3. (the important one here) If it troubles you THAT MUCH, quit playing that specific playlist. Don't go complaining to Bungie about how the pistol has bad aim, or the sniper is this, or blah blah derp dee blah.

Go complain to 343i who did pretty good at remastering the experience for me. Sorry you can't open your eyes past minute details to have fun.

EDIT: One more thing, if you know how to design a hugely successful blockbuster game, I'd like to see it. Because, unlike you, the good people at Bungie and 343 Industries have college degrees for video programming. And based on the argument you just made, you don't know jack -blam!- about video game design.

[Edited on 11.24.2011 12:29 AM PST]

  • 11.24.2011 12:25 AM PDT

tl;dr

  • 11.24.2011 12:30 AM PDT

~HC Swat Iz Back

HaloCharts.com!

OP is a retard.

  • 11.24.2011 12:42 AM PDT


Posted by: ThirstyAvenge
RIP paragraphs.

  • 11.24.2011 3:57 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Achronos
Bungie employees such as myself regularly read the forums. However, your complaints about Halo Anniversary's multiplayer are misdirected. Bungie was not involved in the creation of Halo Aniversary (you'll note that our logo is not on the box anywhere, for example) - we also didn't make the multiplayer maps or the anniversary gametype settings.

You should probably be engaging 343i, as they are the stewards of Halo now.

Posted by: ReachForCheapWep
Anyways, I posted this so people could comment or argue with me which none of you have. Go away, if you are just going to tell me im wrong and not tell me why. Oh and also, is there a way of sending bungie this feedback? I think they need to understand what they did wrong.


Bungie was involved in making the crappiest Halo game that Anniversary's multiplayer is on. Yes, you are involved. You guys failed to fix this game during the time you had control of Reach. You guys failed overall with Reach and you know it.

[Edited on 11.24.2011 6:09 AM PST]

  • 11.24.2011 6:08 AM PDT

He who cannot command himself should obey. And many can command themselves, but much is still lacking before they can obey themselves.
--Thus Spoke Zarathustra


Posted by: GLO Is Back
Posted by: Cowleyad
Posted by: Achronos
Bungie employees such as myself regularly read the forums. However, your complaints about Halo Anniversary's multiplayer are misdirected. Bungie was not involved in the creation of Halo Aniversary (you'll note that our logo is not on the box anywhere, for example) - we also didn't make the multiplayer maps or the anniversary gametype settings.

You should probably be engaging 343i, as they are the stewards of Halo now.

Great work exploiting the once beloved Halo series right into the ground. Zzzzing!


LOL ... yeah, way do disown years of your own effort.

CEA multiplayer == reach engine.
Does Achronos think people dont know this?!?

Mind you seen him dis his own stats service just as quickly. Point out bugs/errors and do they get fixed - nope.
He cant even seem to check the results returned from a request to those shown on the html page returned for the same game.

Picture him at the park with his dogs.
They dump a turd (reach) and he just goes 'not my dogs, they belong to her", turns and walk away.
Classic.

So true. I never expected this sort of a reaction from Bungie. To me, it seems they know Reach was a letdown, they know 343 will be more than happy to raise the turd on a pedestal, and they know they can wash their hands of it and start on something "new."

  • 11.24.2011 8:28 AM PDT

Hi.

I agree. Why do we have to deal with this?!

  • 01.15.2012 10:44 PM PDT


Posted by: Zomechin
I agree. Why do we have to deal with this?!
...

  • 01.15.2012 10:45 PM PDT

spiral out

Why is this back? Please lock.

  • 01.15.2012 10:52 PM PDT

Que Custodiet Ipsos Custodes

--Tea-baggers are funny, it's as if they think they are far more hetero than the people who do it in real life, because they use their e-ballsacks to do it. What a manly victory dance.
~ManBearPig_06~

Halo Anniversarry is Halo 1. It just has extra textures, and a buggy networking system.

You are thinking of Halo: Reach maps that are made to look like Halo 1 maps.


Edit: Well, that's what I get for not looking at the post date.

[Edited on 01.15.2012 10:55 PM PST]

  • 01.15.2012 10:54 PM PDT

I have one speed, One Gear, Go.

I believe that Halo 1 was much harder on Legendary. CEA seems to be a lot easier than the original...to me anyways.

  • 01.15.2012 11:13 PM PDT

I don't need to be in no damn' clan, I am my own clan.
You know the Master Chief? WELL HERE I AM!!!!!

i agree with the others man , it's really hard to

read a long paragraph when it's not double spaced.

Although , I do agree with you on halo ce anny

  • 01.15.2012 11:43 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4