Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Why did Bungie have to ruin reach?
  • Subject: Why did Bungie have to ruin reach?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3

Posted by: Recon Number 54
Life is a journey, if you spend all of it with your nose in your map, you may miss some of the best parts.


Posted by: ryanw96

Posted by: Casselt
Posted by: WeInTheStreets
You're on the computer at 11 oclock in the morning, acting like a 12 year old, and your talking about other people being virgins? Yeah ok buddy and your just rollin in -blam!-es.

16 and a virgin with no intentions of turning -blam!- or being laid. I never said I was having a great sex life either.



I can't tell if you are Frostarded or Beruitarded. We can come to the conclusion of both just to make everybody happy.


How bout E0Starded?

  • 11.25.2011 8:31 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Horse Repairman
RC RuNz the internet. Like the superintendent.

Posted by: SouthPoIe
Clone is an internet God.

Posted by: DerpRoids
RC Clone is the anti-thesis of a lurker.

Like I said. It is an initiation to see if 343 could bring back all the players that left because of Halo: Reach.

  • 11.25.2011 8:33 AM PDT

He who cannot command himself should obey. And many can command themselves, but much is still lacking before they can obey themselves.
--Thus Spoke Zarathustra


Posted by: RC Clone
Like I said. It is an initiation to see if 343 could bring back all the players that left because of Halo: Reach.

An initiation? The only claim to fame 343 has is "re-making" Halo: CE; which, I might add, they did terribly.

Looks like 343 has one steep hill to climb...

  • 11.25.2011 8:35 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Horse Repairman
RC RuNz the internet. Like the superintendent.

Posted by: SouthPoIe
Clone is an internet God.

Posted by: DerpRoids
RC Clone is the anti-thesis of a lurker.


Posted by: Cowleyad

Posted by: RC Clone
Like I said. It is an initiation to see if 343 could bring back all the players that left because of Halo: Reach.

An initiation? The only claim to fame 343 has is "re-making" Halo: CE; which, I might add, they did terribly.

Looks like 343 has one steep hill to climb...

It wouldn't be an initiation if it was easy.

  • 11.25.2011 8:36 AM PDT

only the best game ever.
~Sur Squishy
XBL: D a r k s t a r
PSN: darkstarrr
Minecraft: The_Dark_Star

Forum Rules | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct

How can Bungie ruin their own game? I personally fell that 343i ruined Halo: Reach. Bungie, in my opinion, did a fantastic job on Halo: Reach but many of you guys seem to disagree?

  • 11.25.2011 8:47 AM PDT

Posted by: Tom T
Prolonged exposure to this forum is bad for your health.


Posted by: aBIueBooksheIf
because I like pen­is.

source


Posted by: blade246
but many of you guys seem to disagree?


Only a few tens of thousands of players think otherwise.



[Edited on 11.25.2011 8:49 AM PST]

  • 11.25.2011 8:48 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: And Im Here Too
Posted by: HC WhiteRabbit
cause the crowd(such as myself) who have a give-a-f*** meter running on zero is much more broad than the handful of teenagers that take gaming to a serious level(usually teens). its a sales demographic.


Basically this.



[Edited on 11.25.2011 8:53 AM PST]

  • 11.25.2011 8:53 AM PDT

Frank O'Connor said he doesn't think the Halo series needs to be taken in a radical new direction... it just needs to go "deeper"

"Ultimately the core game mechanic and strength of the universe doesn't need to be changed, it just needs to be taken deeper. We want to make Halo games - we don't want to make Call of Duty or Ridge Racer. We want to make Halo games because we understand what's special about Halo."

I like Reach because of anniversary classic <3

  • 11.25.2011 9:47 AM PDT

Your presence here is quite unneeded. Begone you!!!

Never cared. Just played to win

  • 11.25.2011 10:15 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3