- PhantomPhoenix7
- |
- Honorable Member
Posted by: Mikelp_1
Posted by: PhantomPhoenix7
NO SIDEARM WEAPON SHOULD BE MORE POWERFUL THAN A PRIMARY WEAPON. THAT IS A LAW OF GOOD BALANCE.
You're just making that rule up... What makes a weapon a primary weapon? I don't understand what sets in stone for you that the only way to maintain weapon balance is that the pistol must do what normal sidearms do: suck. Balance isn't defined by niche-based weapon sets.
At least the pistol injects skill into shots for once. I would agree that it moved its way back to the top of the primary weapons and is very useful, but it definitely isn't a scourge to gameplay.
What I mean to say is this. Why is a magnum more powerful than a DMR? In reality, (yes, i know Halo is far from realistic, but that's no excuse) a rifle such as the DMR should be more effective than a Magnum, which is represented as a pistol because it is a sidearm weapon. What I don't understand is why a pistol can outperform a rifle. THIS IS NOT BECAUSE I SUCK, BECAUSE I DON'T. I AM A COMPETENT PLAYER AND MY KDR AS OF NOW IS SOMETHING LIKE 1.12. Power liike the Magnum should be represented as such, like a new hi-power rifle. (HPR)You must agree with this. And while I'm at it, i don't like reduced bloom either. I thought guns were perfectly fine with bloom. 343 is being noob friendly, Something Halo really isn't. The little kids who have never played a shooter should start off with something like Call of Duty, and then move on to more advanced games like Halo and Battlefield (if they prefer a more realistic shooter). Anyway, that's what I believe. Summary: A high-calibur rifle like the DMR should easily Outperform what was ORIGINALLY MEANT TO BE A SIDEARM LIKE THE MAGNUM.
P.S not all AR users are pummelers. I've long-ranged plenty with it. It's called burst-fire. Don't stereotype.
P.S.S All trolls on this thread might as well leave right now, or I'll love and tolerate the -blam!- out of you. I'm not mad, bro. You're desperate.