Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
  • Subject: LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Posted by: Recon Number 54
Life is a journey, if you spend all of it with your nose in your map, you may miss some of the best parts.


Posted by: CROWSCLAW

Posted by: Zeratul

It means, we didn't lose because we "suck" we lost because that other team clearly has no purpose in life but to play Halo... No lie
And...a premium slayer of 2.2 means that you're good? Maybe you should concentrate on raising your poop 0.89 MLG k/d before trying to say anything about being "good."


And raise that 4 loss streak in MLG. LOLOLOLOL

  • 11.28.2011 6:48 PM PDT

It only takes a simple question to change everything.

This is why the matchmaking system fails. How does it make any sense to put a full team up against randoms?

  • 11.28.2011 6:53 PM PDT

Jorge: Bad news is: timer's fried, gonna have to fire it manually.
Noble 6: That's a one way trip...
Jorge: We all make it sooner or later. Better get going, Six, they're gonna need you down there. Listen, Reach has been good to me, it's time to return the favor. Don't deny me this... Tell em' to make it count.

You guys can say what you want, before the game even started, some guys on my team were laughing at them, and they were like "QUIT OUT QUIT OUT" like -blam!- YELLING into the mic

  • 11.28.2011 6:53 PM PDT

Jorge: Bad news is: timer's fried, gonna have to fire it manually.
Noble 6: That's a one way trip...
Jorge: We all make it sooner or later. Better get going, Six, they're gonna need you down there. Listen, Reach has been good to me, it's time to return the favor. Don't deny me this... Tell em' to make it count.


Posted by: RustedEdge

Posted by: CROWSCLAW

Posted by: Zeratul

It means, we didn't lose because we "suck" we lost because that other team clearly has no purpose in life but to play Halo... No lie
And...a premium slayer of 2.2 means that you're good? Maybe you should concentrate on raising your poop 0.89 MLG k/d before trying to say anything about being "good."


And raise that 4 loss streak in MLG. LOLOLOLOL


LOLOLOL everytime I went into MLG it was rands vs a full team

  • 11.28.2011 6:54 PM PDT

-Teraz Twoka kolej "Life is like a double-edged sword, you are one [side] of them"


sh­eithings, lolol
also, fu­srodahsucks

I had a game where I joined a bunch of randoms.

On the other team there was high ranks (Inheritors, Hero's, etc) in a party, yet my team of randoms (that didn't even bother to communicate with each other) STOMPED the other team. I lol'd so hard.

  • 11.28.2011 6:55 PM PDT

Posted by: Recon Number 54
Life is a journey, if you spend all of it with your nose in your map, you may miss some of the best parts.


Posted by: Zeratul

Posted by: RustedEdge

Posted by: CROWSCLAW

Posted by: Zeratul

It means, we didn't lose because we "suck" we lost because that other team clearly has no purpose in life but to play Halo... No lie
And...a premium slayer of 2.2 means that you're good? Maybe you should concentrate on raising your poop 0.89 MLG k/d before trying to say anything about being "good."


And raise that 4 loss streak in MLG. LOLOLOLOL


LOLOLOL everytime I went into MLG it was rands vs a full team


Lol k. Excuses excuses.

  • 11.28.2011 6:55 PM PDT

Posted by: AngryBrute1
Oh yeah, since somebody does not believe what YOU believe; that makes us vapid...
I cannot grasp that what you call "Something happened to nothing, and that nothing became something, and it was smaller than than a period."

Did you roflport them and avoid?
If you did, then I respect you.

  • 11.28.2011 6:55 PM PDT

Jorge: Bad news is: timer's fried, gonna have to fire it manually.
Noble 6: That's a one way trip...
Jorge: We all make it sooner or later. Better get going, Six, they're gonna need you down there. Listen, Reach has been good to me, it's time to return the favor. Don't deny me this... Tell em' to make it count.


Posted by: Wikked Navajoe
Did you roflport them and avoid?
If you did, then I respect you.


LOL? No, I actually preferred them, because I want to get into a map with no vehicles, but in BTB, that's impossible, obviously.

  • 11.28.2011 6:57 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by:MR E0S
Why is hypocrite spelled with an E at the end?
The I in crite is not pronounce as eye.

So, on the one hand I spell it out exactly as it should be.
You follow the standard set before you by fools who can't even get a handle on the rules of their own language.


Posted by: Zeratul

LOLOLOL everytime I went into MLG it was rands vs a full team
Congratulations. You suck.

  • 11.28.2011 6:57 PM PDT

Jorge: Bad news is: timer's fried, gonna have to fire it manually.
Noble 6: That's a one way trip...
Jorge: We all make it sooner or later. Better get going, Six, they're gonna need you down there. Listen, Reach has been good to me, it's time to return the favor. Don't deny me this... Tell em' to make it count.


Posted by: RustedEdge

Posted by: Zeratul

Posted by: RustedEdge

Posted by: CROWSCLAW

Posted by: Zeratul

It means, we didn't lose because we "suck" we lost because that other team clearly has no purpose in life but to play Halo... No lie
And...a premium slayer of 2.2 means that you're good? Maybe you should concentrate on raising your poop 0.89 MLG k/d before trying to say anything about being "good."


And raise that 4 loss streak in MLG. LOLOLOLOL


LOLOLOL everytime I went into MLG it was rands vs a full team


Lol k. Excuses excuses.


u wanna 1v1 me
u wanna 1v1 me
u wanna 1v1 me
u wanna 1v1 me
u wanna 1v1 me
u wanna 1v1 me
u wanna 1v1 me
u wanna 1v1 me
u wanna 1v1 me
u wanna 1v1 me
u wanna 1v1 me
u wanna 1v1 me

  • 11.28.2011 6:58 PM PDT

"There is no sin except stupidity." -Oscar Wilde

You got stomped, who cares if they play a lot?

  • 11.28.2011 6:59 PM PDT

Jorge: Bad news is: timer's fried, gonna have to fire it manually.
Noble 6: That's a one way trip...
Jorge: We all make it sooner or later. Better get going, Six, they're gonna need you down there. Listen, Reach has been good to me, it's time to return the favor. Don't deny me this... Tell em' to make it count.


Posted by: Sins
You got stomped, who cares if they play a lot?


They shouldn't allow full parties in a game with full randoms.

  • 11.28.2011 7:00 PM PDT

Posted by: AngryBrute1
Oh yeah, since somebody does not believe what YOU believe; that makes us vapid...
I cannot grasp that what you call "Something happened to nothing, and that nothing became something, and it was smaller than than a period."

Posted by: Zeratul

Posted by: Sins
You got stomped, who cares if they play a lot?


They shouldn't allow full parties in a game with full randoms.
*Brofists*
So. Darn. True.

  • 11.28.2011 7:02 PM PDT

-Teraz Twoka kolej "Life is like a double-edged sword, you are one [side] of them"


sh­eithings, lolol
also, fu­srodahsucks

Posted by: Zeratul

Posted by: Sins
You got stomped, who cares if they play a lot?


They shouldn't allow full parties in a game with full randoms.

No, randumbs should be allowed to get their arses raped if they search as randumbs.
Their fault, they deal with it.

It's not a party's fault.

  • 11.28.2011 7:03 PM PDT

Posted by: Recon Number 54
Life is a journey, if you spend all of it with your nose in your map, you may miss some of the best parts.


Posted by: Majatek
Posted by: Zeratul

Posted by: Sins
You got stomped, who cares if they play a lot?


They shouldn't allow full parties in a game with full randoms.

No, randumbs should be allowed to get their arses raped if they search as randumbs.
Their fault, they deal with it.

It's not a party's fault.


Absolutely. And making full parties search for others would take a really LONG time. Especially with Reach's declining population.

  • 11.28.2011 7:04 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Noble Member

Searching as a random is the choice of that person. There's an unspoken agreement, especially in BTB, that you will start matchmaking fully aware that you may run into a party. It's just a fact. Not an opinion, a fact: Searching Big TEAM Battle may, in fact, put you against a full party.

Props to you staying though. I would've been gone before 5 minutes was up.

  • 11.28.2011 7:06 PM PDT

Jorge: Bad news is: timer's fried, gonna have to fire it manually.
Noble 6: That's a one way trip...
Jorge: We all make it sooner or later. Better get going, Six, they're gonna need you down there. Listen, Reach has been good to me, it's time to return the favor. Don't deny me this... Tell em' to make it count.


Posted by: Majatek
Posted by: Zeratul

Posted by: Sins
You got stomped, who cares if they play a lot?


They shouldn't allow full parties in a game with full randoms.

No, randumbs should be allowed to get their arses raped if they search as randumbs.
Their fault, they deal with it.

It's not a party's fault.


Lol... COD has it, BF has it, why can't Halo?

  • 11.28.2011 7:10 PM PDT

-Teraz Twoka kolej "Life is like a double-edged sword, you are one [side] of them"


sh­eithings, lolol
also, fu­srodahsucks

Posted by: Zeratul
Lol... COD has it, BF has it, why can't Halo?

That's called a playlist.
CoD has two playlists in this example that I'll show you:
Team Deathmatch
Mercenary

In TDM, a bunch of randoms can search for games, as can parties, and thus they get pared together. It's the randoms choice of searching by themselves rather than partying up with their friends such as those who chose to party up.
In Mercenary, no one is allowed to party up, and everyone is matched up randomly.

Though I see what you mean, it would be nice for Halo: Reach to have new playlists added:
Group Team Slayer (where you and 3 other players must be in the playlist to start searching).
Mercenary Team Slayer (where only you can search alone, but are pared up with a random team of 4 against 4)
Group Invasion (where you and 7 other players party up before you can begin searching for other partied up players)
Mercenary Invasion (where only you can search alone, but are then pared up with a random team of 8 against another random team of 8).

Or something loosely like that.

  • 11.28.2011 7:18 PM PDT

Jorge: Bad news is: timer's fried, gonna have to fire it manually.
Noble 6: That's a one way trip...
Jorge: We all make it sooner or later. Better get going, Six, they're gonna need you down there. Listen, Reach has been good to me, it's time to return the favor. Don't deny me this... Tell em' to make it count.

If anyone says a party of 8 against individual players is fair, you need to be examined by a professional. It's so stupid to think it's fair, a full team of little kids that are coordinated can beat a bunch of randoms. PROVEN.

  • 11.28.2011 7:21 PM PDT

-Teraz Twoka kolej "Life is like a double-edged sword, you are one [side] of them"


sh­eithings, lolol
also, fu­srodahsucks


Posted by: Zeratul
If anyone says a party of 8 against individual players is fair, you need to be examined by a professional. It's so stupid to think it's fair, a full team of little kids that are coordinated can beat a bunch of randoms. PROVEN.

Lol, I think you just ignored what I posted.

Did I ever say that it's fair? No.
Did I say that it's the parties fault for being a party? No.
Did I say that it's the randoms fault for not being in a party and expecting to not be matched up with other randoms, which they do (quite often) and then get smashed by those who party up? Yes.

  • 11.28.2011 7:26 PM PDT

Jorge: Bad news is: timer's fried, gonna have to fire it manually.
Noble 6: That's a one way trip...
Jorge: We all make it sooner or later. Better get going, Six, they're gonna need you down there. Listen, Reach has been good to me, it's time to return the favor. Don't deny me this... Tell em' to make it count.


Posted by: Majatek

Posted by: Zeratul
If anyone says a party of 8 against individual players is fair, you need to be examined by a professional. It's so stupid to think it's fair, a full team of little kids that are coordinated can beat a bunch of randoms. PROVEN.

Lol, I think you just ignored what I posted.

Did I ever say that it's fair? No.
Did I say that it's the parties fault for being a party? No.
Did I say that it's the randoms fault for not being in a party and expecting to not be matched up with other randoms, which they do (quite often) and then get smashed by those who party up? Yes.


You basically did, trying to say it's the fault of the random, who plays Halo expecting to have fun and get into an even matchup, how silly, right?

  • 11.28.2011 7:27 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Nope you're bad.

  • 11.28.2011 7:28 PM PDT

-Teraz Twoka kolej "Life is like a double-edged sword, you are one [side] of them"


sh­eithings, lolol
also, fu­srodahsucks


Posted by: Zeratul

Posted by: Majatek

Posted by: Zeratul
If anyone says a party of 8 against individual players is fair, you need to be examined by a professional. It's so stupid to think it's fair, a full team of little kids that are coordinated can beat a bunch of randoms. PROVEN.

Lol, I think you just ignored what I posted.

Did I ever say that it's fair? No.
Did I say that it's the parties fault for being a party? No.
Did I say that it's the randoms fault for not being in a party and expecting to not be matched up with other randoms, which they do (quite often) and then get smashed by those who party up? Yes.


You basically did, trying to say it's the fault of the random, who plays Halo expecting to have fun and get into an even matchup, how silly, right?

Nope, you're an idiot.

Read what I posted before you farted out your idiocy, and maybe you'd see that I was actually supporting the notion to keep players of randoms from being pared up with other teams that are filled with players that have partied up.

  • 11.28.2011 7:31 PM PDT

Jorge: Bad news is: timer's fried, gonna have to fire it manually.
Noble 6: That's a one way trip...
Jorge: We all make it sooner or later. Better get going, Six, they're gonna need you down there. Listen, Reach has been good to me, it's time to return the favor. Don't deny me this... Tell em' to make it count.


Posted by: Majatek

Posted by: Zeratul

Posted by: Majatek

Posted by: Zeratul
If anyone says a party of 8 against individual players is fair, you need to be examined by a professional. It's so stupid to think it's fair, a full team of little kids that are coordinated can beat a bunch of randoms. PROVEN.

Lol, I think you just ignored what I posted.

Did I ever say that it's fair? No.
Did I say that it's the parties fault for being a party? No.
Did I say that it's the randoms fault for not being in a party and expecting to not be matched up with other randoms, which they do (quite often) and then get smashed by those who party up? Yes.


You basically did, trying to say it's the fault of the random, who plays Halo expecting to have fun and get into an even matchup, how silly, right?

Nope, you're an idiot.

Read what I posted before you farted out your idiocy, and maybe you'd see that I was actually supporting the notion to keep players of randoms from being pared up with other teams that are filled with players that have partied up.


Well, I let your grammatical errors and spelling mistakes slide at first, and almost took what you were saying into consideration, but since you just called me an idiot with no real reason, whatever you wrote is going to remain unread...

  • 11.28.2011 7:34 PM PDT

/=\ncient \_|_/arriors

2 things:

1) the population is so low, you get what you get when searching.
2) they worked together quite well, sounds like they had a good strategy, and executed it (and your team o' randoms )

  • 11.28.2011 7:41 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4