Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: I am the best hog gunner in the world and far greater than icanhasrofl
  • Subject: I am the best hog gunner in the world and far greater than icanhasrofl
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: I am the best hog gunner in the world and far greater than icanhasrofl

I would consider this method cheating.

  • 11.29.2011 7:37 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Opinion

Posted by: A 3 Legged Goat
It's as if they're trying to say tangible data transfers over. Only intangibles do.


No, it's because Reach is made for -blam!-tards who sucked at H3 so everyone can be good at it (look at all the thumbless retards who couldn't get past 40 in H3 yet have k/d of over 2 in Reach) so H3 stats are a better indication of skill at a proper Halo game.


I agree with Goat. Comparing Reach to halo 3 in any way is an insult to Halo 3. The games are completely different as day and night. The only thing that means anything is what Halo in general requires--communication, intuition, teamshooting--all that good stuff. The physical stats, however, are completely irrelevant. Why bring up H2 stats when comparing players between H2 and H3? The games are different.

The obvious fact that Reach is dumbed down from Halo 3 can be completely ignored, just as Reach stats will be when H4 comes out. Whether that game is dumbed down from Reach or not is left to 343i.

If you wanna compare H3 stats to H4 stats you're welcome to. I don't see the point, but at least we wont be discussing Reach stats. Reach stats mean about as much as an anthill in a meadow. They're negligible.


[Edited on 11.29.2011 7:41 AM PST]

  • 11.29.2011 7:40 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Confederateghad
^ dumb kid


Only those who have no rebuttal resort to insults.

All the 50s you got wont mean a thing when Halo 4 comes out. It's what you learned along the way, not the physical stats themselves.

I'm probably older than you by the way, 'kid'

[Edited on 11.29.2011 7:43 AM PST]

  • 11.29.2011 7:43 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Confederateghad
I call everyone kid, kid.

Pull up your skirt.


lol acting badass on the internet.

  • 11.29.2011 7:45 AM PDT

Lieutenant in the ArchAngels clan. Contact tidalrider for information regarding joining.


Posted by: Confederateghad
I call everyone kid, kid.

Pull up your skirt.


This can be summed up with the words:

"Too cool for the internet"

Go get banned, you ass.

[Edited on 11.29.2011 7:55 AM PST]

  • 11.29.2011 7:55 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Horse Repairman
RC RuNz the internet. Like the superintendent.

Posted by: SouthPoIe
Clone is an internet God.

Posted by: DerpRoids
RC Clone is the anti-thesis of a lurker.


Posted by: Covenant Crates

Posted by: Confederateghad
I call everyone kid, kid.

Pull up your skirt.


lol acting badass on the internet.


He doesn't act.

  • 11.29.2011 7:56 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Scatcycle3
So everyone who sucked at Halo 3 is defending Reach?

Typical.
Why are you not defending Reach?

  • 11.29.2011 7:58 AM PDT

Lieutenant in the ArchAngels clan. Contact tidalrider for information regarding joining.


Posted by: DMR

Posted by: Scatcycle3
So everyone who sucked at Halo 3 is defending Reach?

Typical.
Why are you not defending Reach?


HIDE YO KIDS

WE GOT A BADASS OVER HERE

  • 11.29.2011 7:59 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: natergator08

Posted by: DMR

Posted by: Scatcycle3
So everyone who sucked at Halo 3 is defending Reach?

Typical.
Why are you not defending Reach?


HIDE YO KIDS

WE GOT A BADASS OVER HERE
I R SO BADASS.

  • 11.29.2011 8:00 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Covenant Crates
I agree with Goat. Comparing Reach to halo 3 in any way is an insult to Halo 3. The games are completely different as day and night. The only thing that means anything is what Halo in general requires--communication, intuition, teamshooting--all that good stuff. The physical stats, however, are completely irrelevant. Why bring up H2 stats when comparing players between H2 and H3? The games are different.


You're missing the point, kid.

I've bolded the part where you were so close to being right. Yes it's just the "good stuff", as you so succinctly put it, that matters but the physical stats are directly correlated to your understanding of the "good stuff" and, as such, can't be dismissed.

Anyone who knows anything about Halo would admit that the requirement to understand the "good stuff" in order to succeed has been seriously watered down in Reach in nearly every single playlist and, as such, the physical stats acquired in the later game aren't to be viewed in the same light (or given the same weight) as the stats from previous Halos.

[Edited on 11.29.2011 8:02 AM PST]

  • 11.29.2011 8:01 AM PDT

".....and my personal favorite, You Just Got Sarged."

RVB :Sarge

All you kids talking about halo 3...so young. Go back in time and get raped in halo 2 and then tell me about being good in any halo. :)

  • 11.30.2011 3:28 AM PDT


Warrior Inside
Why are you bumping this boring thread? I'm only posting because i was wondering.

  • 11.30.2011 3:31 AM PDT

".....and my personal favorite, You Just Got Sarged."

RVB :Sarge

That's fine, a .7 ratio in halo 2 is probably like a 2+ in reach LOL.

(throwing random numbers out there)

[Edited on 11.30.2011 3:32 AM PST]

  • 11.30.2011 3:31 AM PDT

".....and my personal favorite, You Just Got Sarged."

RVB :Sarge

...actually I think that's true for me as well! I didn't have a pc at that point and all the other games a played of the FPS variety were on the N64 lol

  • 11.30.2011 3:36 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2