Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: If you play in a "team" you have no skill whatsoever..
  • Subject: If you play in a "team" you have no skill whatsoever..
Subject: If you play in a "team" you have no skill whatsoever..

lol at OP dodging everything and being bad.

If you play as a random, expect random results.

If you play as a team, you spend most of your time facing randoms, and any results that involve a game against randoms are completely meaningless. Your overall stats will be better, but that doesn't mean you are.

  • 12.02.2011 12:17 PM PDT

I am now accepting 1v1 challenges against people who think running as a team means you aren't indivually skilled.

I will post the results, even if I lose.

  • 12.02.2011 12:19 PM PDT

Member of team Master Theory.

17th Mythic Conqueror of Halo 3.
5th Mythic Conqueror of ODST.
If you would like to know more about Mythic difficulty please go to this thread. Thank you.

Please do not send me "recruitment messages" as I'm not interested in joining any groups currently.


Posted by: vballryan
I am now accepting 1v1 challenges against people who think running as a team means you aren't indivually skilled.

I will post the results, even if I lose.


I'd say this would be interesting but I doubt anyone will accept that challenge.

  • 12.02.2011 12:40 PM PDT

Posted by: MATCLAN

Posted by: vballryan
I am now accepting 1v1 challenges against people who think running as a team means you aren't indivually skilled.

I will post the results, even if I lose.


I'd say this would be interesting but I doubt anyone will accept that challenge.


Once a challenger appears, they back down because they know that they are all talk. I knew that no one was going to challenge me, because they don't want to lose, it was to prove a point. You shouldn't go out of your way to face someone in a 1v1 with no purpose behind it

[Edited on 12.02.2011 12:56 PM PST]

  • 12.02.2011 12:55 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Resume
Reach Stats
Halo 3 Stats

"In Halo 3 not all 50's were good players, but all good players were 50's."

Your opinion is invalid.


Posted by: vballryan
You shouldn't go out of your way to face someone in a 1v1 with no purpose behind it


Exactly. 1v1 only shows who is better at 1v1's. I know a few players who consistently beat me in 1v1's, but are terrible teammates in comparison to myself.

  • 12.02.2011 1:00 PM PDT

only the best game ever.
~Sur Squishy
XBL: D a r k s t a r
PSN: darkstarrr
Minecraft: The_Dark_Star

Forum Rules | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct

The only time that I can agree to this is in Invasion. I hate being pared up with a full party of Invasion, when my team is full of nothing but randoms.

The only exceptable time is maybe in The Arena. Although I may be hypocritical here because I have played a full party of Big Team before, but that was just for fun, not because we were so serious about it.

  • 12.02.2011 1:03 PM PDT

i am the leader of the short bus we are the best invasion players ever. we hate little jimmy's who ruin halo. were just a bunch of friends trying to have fun in this world and maybe slaughter a few villagers a long the way

so TEAM slayers isn't meant for teams?

  • 12.02.2011 1:06 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Resume
Reach Stats
Halo 3 Stats

"In Halo 3 not all 50's were good players, but all good players were 50's."

Your opinion is invalid.


Posted by: AUSTINWOOOOOO
so TEAM slayers isn't meant for teams?

The stupidity of the OPs argument is actually causing me anger. If he is a troll then he is quite successful.

  • 12.02.2011 1:07 PM PDT

Turn on, Tune in, Drop out

GT is fat aggre55ion


Posted by: no weakness
Posted by: Zeratul
If you join a game in a full party, you're bad..
To touch on the OP's topic...

Don't be so shallow - or such a troll.

A player isn't bad simply because they search full party. However, that being said, players who do search full party a majority of the time will have inflated statistics as compared to searching solo.

Does that make them bad? No. It just means their 4.0 k/d doesn't make them king of all Halo players - but they could be and probably are still a very good player.

To the OP - grow up - and to those who do search full party and brag about their stats - heed that advice as well.



when you say "search full party" do you mean that you and 3 friends in a party search for a game in MM? I'm confused on why doing this gives any indication of how good a player is or how their party makes it easier to boost stats. I know it's a dumb question, but I'm a dummy.

  • 12.02.2011 1:07 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Resume
Reach Stats
Halo 3 Stats

"In Halo 3 not all 50's were good players, but all good players were 50's."

Your opinion is invalid.


Posted by: philisweatly
when you say "search full party" do you mean that you and 3 friends in a party search for a game in MM? I'm confused on why doing this gives any indication of how good a player is or how their party makes it easier to boost stats. I know it's a dumb question, but I'm a dummy.

Searching in a full party means having the maximum amount of players possible on your team in the lobby before you search. Searching in Team Slayer with a party of 4 or Big Team Battle with a party of 8, for example.

When you have a full party you will almost always be calling out and working together. And full parties can still match against random people who have never player together. It is very easy for a full party of 8 to absolutely destroy a team of 8 individuals in Big Team Battle.

This leads to inflated stats when you search in playlists with a full party all the time.

In my opinion there's no reason to ever search as a random if you have friends online. So the OP is retarded.

  • 12.02.2011 1:14 PM PDT

I like pie, and halo. Uhm nom nom Halo pie ^.^

what is going on!?

  • 12.02.2011 1:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Thou craven beef-witted blind-worm!

  • 12.02.2011 2:09 PM PDT

teams are cool. no teams are not cool. I WIN.

  • 12.02.2011 2:24 PM PDT

90% of the Random vs. Parties matches are unfair, they get an advantadge of teamwork, and they´re going to likely spawn trap the randoms if the map allows it. That only inflates stats and give the impression that the party player is better than he actually is. And because of this, stats aren´t an accurate way of measuring skill, neither K/D.

Being in a good party is like having good luck all the time, meanwhile playing as a random is a roulette, and not all people have friends who still play this game or have access to a party.

I would gladly accept my friends´s parties if they weren´t ruled by elitist and arrogant people who boot me of them, just because I don´t belong to their "lolClans", and no, I´m not going to change my spartan, for me is fine the way it looks.

The OP fails at pointing that all party players are "bad", but also some Captains ÜberproS with their ego sized as hot-air balloons, fails at saying that all randoms are bad.

For me, this problem would get easily solved with party restrictions, Randoms vs. Randoms, Parties vs. Parties, and there you go, the harmony of the universe is restaured.

  • 12.02.2011 3:11 PM PDT

sup?

i play halo reach because i want to play in a team, if anything, teamwork is a highley prized skill needed in real life as well as our in-game counterparts, he may of been trash-talking, but that does not meen that teemwork makes you bad at the game
its unbeliveable how stupid you sound...

  • 12.02.2011 3:28 PM PDT

Yes, I'm pro at Action Sack.

Can't be beaten.
Posted by: I cant be banned
Colonel logic.

  • 12.02.2011 3:40 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Cory Peltier

It does take skill to work as a team, because NO WORKS AS A TEAM!!

  • 12.02.2011 3:56 PM PDT

Posted by: MR E05
Scrub talk

Some kids need some perspective.

  • 12.02.2011 4:03 PM PDT

Leon > HUNK > Wesker > Ada > Jill > Claire > Chris

*facepalm* And people wonder why they hate Reach so much. It's a teamwork orientated game, not CoD where 1 guy can make a team. If you don't want teamwork go play Rumble Pit while me and my team continue to make people like you rage like no man has ever raged before. It takes teamwork to win, it's a skill, but all of the Reachtards here are too stupid to know how to master the skill.

  • 12.02.2011 4:08 PM PDT

Posted by: aBlueBookshelf
Goat was famous. Irie was infamous. Gh0st was FaMaS.

My stats in Halol 4

Typical Waypoint post.
no it's "its got to go" you wouldn't say the "it is got to go" would you?

OP is dildos.

  • 12.02.2011 4:08 PM PDT

Leon > HUNK > Wesker > Ada > Jill > Claire > Chris


Posted by: Zeratul

Posted by: JEDI 915

Posted by: Zeratul
If you join a game in a full party, you're bad..


If you join a game with randoms, you're bad..



Lol, no please, someone prove me wrong. You can't. And deep down inside, you know it's true.

You can't be convinced otherwise because your stupid. And you can't fight stupid people because they are too stupid to know when they've lost.

  • 12.02.2011 4:15 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Main | Connection | Youtube Channel


50s: | Slayer | Doubles | Lone Wolves | SWAT | Snipers |


Posted by: Hi GunKoMa
Lol this is still going.

  • 12.02.2011 4:21 PM PDT

Posted by: Gh0st is Bad
OP is dildos.

lol

  • 12.02.2011 4:33 PM PDT

He who cannot command himself should obey. And many can command themselves, but much is still lacking before they can obey themselves.
--Thus Spoke Zarathustra


Posted by: Leon Kennedy85

Posted by: Zeratul

Posted by: JEDI 915

Posted by: Zeratul
If you join a game in a full party, you're bad..


If you join a game with randoms, you're bad..



Lol, no please, someone prove me wrong. You can't. And deep down inside, you know it's true.

You can't be convinced otherwise because your stupid. And you can't fight stupid people because they are too stupid to know when they've lost.

"You're".

  • 12.02.2011 4:58 PM PDT