- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
About ICanHasRofl being a host booter.
Lawl.
Posted by: nicksta14
He's told me he does, you're acting like he's afraid to own up to it. Which he isn't.
Posted by: Ryus Shoryuken
Posted by: Revvisnipz
Posted by: Ghost Bn
Posted by: Revvisnipz
Posted by: Ghost Bn
why must we prove anything to you?.. Your opinion is your own...its not a fact nor a statistical research..there is nothing for us to "disprove"..there is simply no point.
Because 90% of this forum calls me bad for having this opinion, they say i'm worng and that no bloom is better. I would like actually reasons instead of those derpstatments.
its their opinion...except they prove why you are bad...
No one has proved anything against me yet?
Posted by: Ryus Shoryuken
Here's the bottom line comrade:
No Bloom = no randomness, and runs purely on player vs player aim
Bloom = randomness, and luck can factor into who wins a gun battle
Therefore, no Bloom is the more skillful expression of gameplay. That's it. No two ways about it, it is factual and not up for debate.
Here ya go sunshine.
Did you read the OP? Occasionally i must admit you can lose to a spammer but no often at all. You should be able to outstrafe him in vanilla=pacing shots win.
I'm talking about skill, here not randomness, you need skill to pace shots correctly aim for head etc.
With such short ZB kill times, both players can 5shot each other nearly instantly(unless they suck) And if they do suck and are missing THEY ARE NOT GOING TO HIT YOU WHEN BLOOM IS PRESENT.