- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: Revvisnipz
O no OP but dis guy spammed at me n killd me omg!!?? Yes he may have had a full blown reticle BUT even if there was no bloom he would have been aiming straight at your head.
What?
99% of DMR 1v1 kills with no other circumstances are now trade offs(if you have thumbs and can aim)
False. You could even argue that with an increased movement speed, 1v1 battles end in a trade less due to the higher importance placed on strafing.
Movement speed is not fast enough, straffing is useless because you're dead before you can change directions twice.
False, provided you're in a 1v1 battle, taking the time to change directions once in the average strafe would take less than two seconds, while the kill time is greater than two seconds.
Melee is now one punch one head shot(Fix this right now MLG) one of the best things about melee in MLG was that BK's could never kill you with melee.
It's been one melee + one head shot since at least Halo 2 (correct me if I'm wrong), so I'm not sure what you're arguing here.
Bleed through is bad for gameplay.
No, a lack of bleed through is bad for gameplay. Consider the following situation:
Player A shoots Player B three times.
B melees A.
A melees B, but due to a lack of bleed through, B is stil alive.
B melees A. Despite being down in the battle, B wins.
This is antithetical to competitive (for lack of a better word) gaming. Player B isn't exhibiting any special strategy; he's merely exploiting a poorly designed system.