What the hell are you talking about? My idea: Someone posts link to meatspin.com. Mod bans user for a post with meatspin.com in the post. Meatspin.com is automatically added to the Link Blacklist; anyone that tries to post it is autobanned. Where's the problem, exactly?
You're the only one who claims it would be ineffective, and your argument doesn't even make sense.
Posted by: CrazzySnipe55
Posted by: Xplode441
Posted by: CrazzySnipe55
Fair enough. Still not worth touching the code. Do you know how many shock sites they can link to? Lots.
Your idea is impractical at the very least.
It's ignorant and is not going to be implemented.
Ignorance is bliss, eh? You must be a blissful chap.
I don't see how it's ignorant if it would work to an extent. As was said, it would be better protection than what we already have. Plus, if the moderators could do it, they could continually increase the list of shock sites that can be linked here.
I'd love just a tinyurl blocker, something to block shortened links. I don't find them necessary on here, and they're mostly used for trouble.You're suggesting a system in which we gradually increase a list of links to pictures of GIFs of nude people committing lude acts (or, just, shock sites) and block them, yeah? You might as well just start blocking every site on the internet. It'd be an equally productive feat.
Here, let's start with http://aaaaaa.com/.