Posted by: TheSpiderChief
Can't take post seriously when spelling is non-exsistent.
Posted by: redstorm205
How is no having bloom and winning 99 percent of your battles against enemies worse than you less fir than winning 80 percent of your battles with bloom. People who argue this either never play the new mlg and there fore don't have a reason to argue or are bad at it. I'm more accurate so I win more duels when no bloom is envolved. Sorry community but spammers don't win by spamming with no bloom your just not good enough to finish the kills because you can't get a head shot.
I don't take games seriously but spelling, thats a whole other story.