Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: I'm very confused
  • Subject: I'm very confused
Subject: I'm very confused

How is no having bloom and winning 99 percent of your battles against enemies worse than you less fir than winning 80 percent of your battles with bloom. People who argue this either never play the new mlg and there fore don't have a reason to argue or are bad at it. I'm more accurate so I win more duels when no bloom is envolved. Sorry community but spammers don't win by spamming with no bloom your just not good enough to finish the kills because you can't get a head shot.

  • 12.13.2011 7:50 PM PDT

Cool story bro.

  • 12.13.2011 7:51 PM PDT

Are u mad bro?

  • 12.13.2011 7:52 PM PDT


Posted by: CharlesBrown33
Cool story bro.

  • 12.13.2011 7:54 PM PDT

http://www.capturemyhaloclips.com/ - Get your Halo clips captured.
The Artists Corner - Show other members your artistic talent.
Storywrite - Where I am writing my book.

Can't take post seriously when spelling is non-exsistent.

Posted by: redstorm205
How is no having bloom and winning 99 percent of your battles against enemies worse than you less fir than winning 80 percent of your battles with bloom. People who argue this either never play the new mlg and there fore don't have a reason to argue or are bad at it. I'm more accurate so I win more duels when no bloom is envolved. Sorry community but spammers don't win by spamming with no bloom your just not good enough to finish the kills because you can't get a head shot.


[Edited on 12.13.2011 8:02 PM PST]

  • 12.13.2011 7:59 PM PDT

Join The Spartan I Project today!

SIP is here to help you achieve a 1750 gamer score, unlocking all of the armor permutations for both Spartans and Elites.

http://www.bungie.net/fanclub/sip/group/joingroup.aspx

people still play reach?

  • 12.13.2011 8:08 PM PDT


Posted by: TheSpiderChief
Can't take post seriously when spelling is non-exsistent.

Posted by: redstorm205
How is no having bloom and winning 99 percent of your battles against enemies worse than you less fir than winning 80 percent of your battles with bloom. People who argue this either never play the new mlg and there fore don't have a reason to argue or are bad at it. I'm more accurate so I win more duels when no bloom is envolved. Sorry community but spammers don't win by spamming with no bloom your just not good enough to finish the kills because you can't get a head shot.


I don't take games seriously but spelling, thats a whole other story.

  • 12.13.2011 8:12 PM PDT

Posted by: redstorm205

Posted by: TheSpiderChief
Can't take post seriously when spelling is non-exsistent.

Posted by: redstorm205
How is no having bloom and winning 99 percent of your battles against enemies worse than you less fir than winning 80 percent of your battles with bloom. People who argue this either never play the new mlg and there fore don't have a reason to argue or are bad at it. I'm more accurate so I win more duels when no bloom is envolved. Sorry community but spammers don't win by spamming with no bloom your just not good enough to finish the kills because you can't get a head shot.


I don't take games seriously but spelling, thats a whole other story.

WTF.

[Edited on 12.13.2011 8:15 PM PST]

  • 12.13.2011 8:14 PM PDT