Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: REACH is in 7th place on the Xbox live chart ?!?! Epic fail Bungie!!!
  • Subject: REACH is in 7th place on the Xbox live chart ?!?! Epic fail Bungie!!!
Subject: REACH is in 7th place on the Xbox live chart ?!?! Epic fail Bungie!!!

Not even sure why MW2 is even up there. I'm sure Black Ops and FIFA will drop soon. It's no surprise that Mw3 is at the top, and after a million people beat Skyrim it will drop as well. And Reach will go up.

  • 12.15.2011 3:43 PM PDT

-Teraz Twoka kolej "Life is like a double-edged sword, you are one [side] of them"


sh­eithings, lolol
also, fu­srodahsucks

I'm surprised noone noticed that the reference to Bungie's favourite number is also Halo Reach's rank in the Xbox Live most played list.

7

lololololol

  • 12.15.2011 3:46 PM PDT

Country: United States.
State: Pennsylvania.
County: Warren.
I graduated from high school on June-11-2011. I'm 19 right now. I'm turning 20 in December. I like playing video games, and board games. I like reading Sci-Fi, and World War II novels, and what not.

"There is nothing better in the world than being better at a video game than someone else....oh wait"

Posted by: Majatek
I'm surprised noone noticed that the reference to Bungie's favourite number is also Halo Reach's rank in the Xbox Live most played list.

7

lololololol

_____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ____

Posted by: MrFortunato
Has anyone noticed that Reach has now reached Bungie's favourite number in the charts? :)

Maybe that's what they were aiming for a year on?



Posted by: smithers14
lol, i giggled when i read 7th, thats bungies number, so i dont think they care, even if 343i have it now, i dont think they care either



Posted by: Frenzy Killer
They might be number 7 but 7 is their lucky number.

  • 12.15.2011 3:59 PM PDT

-Teraz Twoka kolej "Life is like a double-edged sword, you are one [side] of them"


sh­eithings, lolol
also, fu­srodahsucks


Posted by: BerzerkCommando
Posted by: Majatek
I'm surprised noone noticed that the reference to Bungie's favourite number is also Halo Reach's rank in the Xbox Live most played list.

7

lololololol

_____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ____

Posted by: MrFortunato
Has anyone noticed that Reach has now reached Bungie's favourite number in the charts? :)

Maybe that's what they were aiming for a year on?



Posted by: smithers14
lol, i giggled when i read 7th, thats bungies number, so i dont think they care, even if 343i have it now, i dont think they care either



Posted by: Frenzy Killer
They might be number 7 but 7 is their lucky number.



I'm lazy, bite me <3

  • 12.15.2011 4:03 PM PDT


Posted by: BerzerkCommando
How is Skyrim number 3?
That game is just single player.

Everyone will play it a few times and eventually its average online population will die down due to lack of a multiplayer/other things to keep players coming back to it every time.

  • 12.15.2011 4:07 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Lol.

You seem upset.

  • 12.15.2011 4:10 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Member

Posted by: burritosenior
Halo 2 had absolutely no competition for the entirety of its 'life cycle.'

Halo 3 fell to third a year before Halo: Reach came out and never went above that since.

Halo: Reach maintained that third place until all these new titles started coming out, at which point players wanted to play other games.

I haven't touched Halo: Reach but once since September. I still realize it is an amazing game. So... that sort of makes you look silly.
DURRRRR

Posted by: burritosenior
Halo 2 had absolutely no competition for the entirety of its 'life cycle.'
Agreeable.

Posted by: burritosenior
Halo 3 fell to third a year before Halo: Reach came out and never went above that since.
Proof, or suck on these nuts. In fact, it's not true. Here. Is. PROOOF. Ignorant bastard.

Posted by: burritosenior
Halo: Reach maintained that third place until all these new titles started coming out, at which point players wanted to play other games.
Ummm... Halo 3 still did MUCH better. At least Halo 3 remained number 1 until MW2, which was two years after its release. Halo: Reach dropped to number 3 weeks after release. Hurr durr.

Posted by: burritosenior
So... that sort of makes you look silly.
GTFO. You proved nothing. Quit spreading your pathetic stupidity all over the internet.

  • 12.15.2011 4:14 PM PDT

Country: United States.
State: Pennsylvania.
County: Warren.
I graduated from high school on June-11-2011. I'm 19 right now. I'm turning 20 in December. I like playing video games, and board games. I like reading Sci-Fi, and World War II novels, and what not.

"There is nothing better in the world than being better at a video game than someone else....oh wait"

Posted by: ThreeSixXero

Posted by: BerzerkCommando
How is Skyrim number 3?
That game is just single player.

Everyone will play it a few times and eventually its average online population will die down due to lack of a multiplayer/other things to keep players coming back to it every time.

I thought the chart was for multiplayer games. I didn't know it's for all types of games.

  • 12.15.2011 4:15 PM PDT

Wait 4 Halo 4.


Posted by: BerzerkCommando
Posted by: ThreeSixXero

Posted by: BerzerkCommando
How is Skyrim number 3?
That game is just single player.

Everyone will play it a few times and eventually its average online population will die down due to lack of a multiplayer/other things to keep players coming back to it every time.

I thought the chart was for multiplayer games. I didn't know it's for all types of games.


*face wall*

  • 12.15.2011 4:23 PM PDT

Posted by: Yamadog27
Opinions are like butholes. Everyone's got one, nobody wants to hear about it.


Posted by: A 3 Legged Goat
we must realize that Reach is a year old game. The reason a 2 year old CoD is up there is because there's 2 recent CoD games that have come out. People who don't have MW3 are playing MW2 and Black Ops. When H4 comes out, Reach's population will similarly increase.

And we should also remember that CoD is more popular than Halo. It's more accessible, more modern, and there's a new one ever year. That's why Microsoft wants to put out a new Halo every year.

QFT

  • 12.15.2011 4:31 PM PDT

Posted by: Yamadog27
Opinions are like butholes. Everyone's got one, nobody wants to hear about it.


Posted by: FatM

You're mad... over a game.

And seeing the amount of 12 year old language you use, I'm not surprised you don't have a girlfriend.

[Edited on 12.15.2011 4:36 PM PST]

  • 12.15.2011 4:35 PM PDT

Why are you here?

More importantly, BO beating BF3? Disappointing.

  • 12.15.2011 5:25 PM PDT

"What's up baby, how are you doin'? I hate the sound of my own voice and I been invited here to distract my self from the fact that I wrote all of this garbage."


Posted by: FatM
Posted by: burritosenior
Halo 2 had absolutely no competition for the entirety of its 'life cycle.'

Halo 3 fell to third a year before Halo: Reach came out and never went above that since.

Halo: Reach maintained that third place until all these new titles started coming out, at which point players wanted to play other games.

I haven't touched Halo: Reach but once since September. I still realize it is an amazing game. So... that sort of makes you look silly.
DURRRRR

Posted by: burritosenior
Halo 2 had absolutely no competition for the entirety of its 'life cycle.'
Agreeable.

Posted by: burritosenior
Halo 3 fell to third a year before Halo: Reach came out and never went above that since.
Proof, or suck on these nuts. In fact, it's not true. Here. Is. PROOOF. Ignorant bastard.

Posted by: burritosenior
Halo: Reach maintained that third place until all these new titles started coming out, at which point players wanted to play other games.
Ummm... Halo 3 still did MUCH better. At least Halo 3 remained number 1 until MW2, which was two years after its release. Halo: Reach dropped to number 3 weeks after release. Hurr durr.

Posted by: burritosenior
So... that sort of makes you look silly.
GTFO. You proved nothing. Quit spreading your pathetic stupidity all over the internet.


Now I remember why I don't visit this forum: 12 year olds.

  • 12.15.2011 5:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Reach is awful.


Yet somehow, I think Halo 4 will even manage to somehow be WORSE than Reach.

343i will make it even more casual, if thats even possible....

  • 12.15.2011 10:01 PM PDT


Posted by: Sparlan63
How is it Bungies fail if people are interested in other games?


I cant believe you just said that!

  • 12.15.2011 10:05 PM PDT

Posted by: FatMYou need to calm down, kid.
>.<

Edit: I doubled checked. Seems I looked in the weeks prior to Reach coming out and the time I looked at the beginning of the year it was the same. Still, the rest of my statement is completely accurate regardless, and you are rather whiny. Also, you realize your argument means that Mario is better than Call of Duty, Halo, Gears of War, etc. combined since it reigned for like 20 years, right? After all, if a game was the 'most played' for a longer time, regardless of competition being present or not, it was clearly the best! Just like kick the can is superior to Mario since that was popular for even more decades!
:/

[Edited on 12.15.2011 10:22 PM PST]

  • 12.15.2011 10:08 PM PDT

Marine Corps.
Semper Fi.

Posted by: Wikked Navajoe
My problems [with Reach] are basically just full parties, mlg, and people who go out of their way not to get killed.

So it went up in the ratings? That's good, because it was number 8.

  • 12.15.2011 10:12 PM PDT


Posted by: PersonifiedHell
What do you people not understand? Reach only exists because Bungie had a contract with Microsoft to make 2 more Halo games before they can become independent. ODST was the first, (remember when it was just going to be DLC? They made it a full game instead of course so they only had 1 more game to make) and the second was Reach.

Bungie completely checked out of the Halo business with 3. They could care less if Reach sucked or not. They only made it because they had to.


I guess you are the spokes person for Bungie now!

  • 12.15.2011 10:13 PM PDT

R.I.P CrunchyBoi 22 (old profile)

I pretty sure mw2 has 20000 ppl and halo reach has about 50k-100k

  • 12.15.2011 10:26 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Nobody who ever makes these threads actually put up good arguments, nor do the people who try to argue against it.


Just pointless.

[Edited on 12.15.2011 10:51 PM PST]

  • 12.15.2011 10:49 PM PDT

M6D
9000

This is what im hearing from the op.

FU bungie. You guys suck balls. Reach is terrible.

Remember How good Halo 2/3 were.


What an ungrateful SOB. If it were not for Bungie you would have never experienced this great thing called Halo. And who knows how long it would have taken for someone else to make an FPS work on a console. Not to mention that without Bungie, the Xbox would have failed.

People like you need to sit down and STFU. Yeah Reach is not as good as the other game. Big deal.

  • 12.15.2011 10:56 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

SKYRIM!! Imagine if that game was MP. Oh boy.

  • 12.15.2011 11:07 PM PDT

A year old game against very popular titles? It makes sense moron.

If anything Gears of War did horrid.

[Edited on 12.15.2011 11:11 PM PST]

  • 12.15.2011 11:11 PM PDT

New Marathon? Thanks Bungie!

Reach is a fantastic game and theres tons of games that r great but dont make that list (also I facepalmed at ur user name)

  • 12.15.2011 11:44 PM PDT

Join Halo Haven for all things related to Halo 4


Tell her that If you jingle my bells, Ill promise you a white Christmas - Call Me Venom
The world can't end next month. My yogurt expires in 2013 - Princess Cadence
If Apple invented a car, would it have windows? - Xxembers


Posted by: mojeda101
A year old game against very popular titles? It makes sense moron.

If anything Gears of War did horrid.


GoW has a small community.

  • 12.16.2011 3:15 AM PDT