Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: REACH is in 7th place on the Xbox live chart ?!?! Epic fail Bungie!!!
  • Subject: REACH is in 7th place on the Xbox live chart ?!?! Epic fail Bungie!!!
Subject: REACH is in 7th place on the Xbox live chart ?!?! Epic fail Bungie!!!

Dont be a menace and ill give u some cookies

you know its funny how Batman Arkham Shi*ty won best 360 game in the VGAs yet its not even in the top 8 played games for the Xbox. Lol

  • 12.19.2011 4:52 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

WTF Humanity!

You mad bro? Besides, 7 is their lucky number.

  • 12.19.2011 5:12 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

there are almost 900 games available for purchase to play on the xbox 360. number 7 isn't that bad.

  • 12.21.2011 8:13 AM PDT

Call of duty appeals to more people because it has evolved from just a game into social media, and it's much easier for people who suck at first person shooters.


FIFA is just a hype, I guarantee it's comprised of people in the UK

Skyrim is new, give it time.

Battlefield has jets bro, gotta give it that.

Halo would be #1 or #2 If none of the above were happening.

  • 12.21.2011 8:18 AM PDT


Posted by: XI EP1C IX
you know its funny how Batman Arkham Shi*ty won best 360 game in the VGAs yet its not even in the top 8 played games for the Xbox. Lol


Once you do the story, you've done it all.

  • 12.21.2011 8:19 AM PDT

i enjoy reach,but enjoyed halo 3 a little more,due to the fact the people i played with,but 7th in the charts aint that bad.BUNGIES favourite number 7

  • 12.22.2011 12:31 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Heroic Member

Ancient Warriors

Aussie HALO Player

Michael Jordan, the Greatest Ever!

Thor's Mjolnir

Who cares I'm still playing it everyday...

  • 12.22.2011 12:32 PM PDT

Quit -blam!- stalking me you weirdo.


Posted by: GLO Is Back
Gauging how the Indie developer community have reacted to aerospace (1 title in 2 years?!?) you gotta admit there is a stink around the bungie name.


This is the most idiotic thing I have ever heard, ever.

Reach was a great game, but it wasn't able to keep up with annual games like COD. Scifi games are dead.

  • 12.22.2011 12:37 PM PDT

Well, considering the number 7 placement, I think someone is behind this...jk. I agree though, a game created 3 years ago (and a bad gone-too-far one in fact(yes, MW2)) is a place ahead of it. That's terrible.

  • 12.22.2011 1:25 PM PDT

Posted by: AngryBrute1
Oh yeah, since somebody does not believe what YOU believe; that makes us vapid...
I cannot grasp that what you call "Something happened to nothing, and that nothing became something, and it was smaller than than a period."

..And why do we care about the position of Reach here?
there are still people playing it, right?
Also, NUMBER 7th place!!!! they must've known eventually it would be seven!

[Edited on 12.22.2011 1:27 PM PST]

  • 12.22.2011 1:26 PM PDT

What's more to say but i live day by day. Never forgetting that my impact on the world isn't that important. Always waiting for the end of the day. Night is the most important. Welcome to my world you will find that the sun is unimportant.

Let's see who is to blame for the fact that halo reach has dropped in online activity hmmmmmm. Oh i know the fact that the people want to play something else right now.

  • 12.22.2011 1:28 PM PDT

It's Halo: Reach. What did you expect? A Halo at Halo 2 or 3 standards? You might as well get used to the charts looking like this...

Casual, easy, short lived. The quote "next years will be better"
And somthing on the lines of "Make Halo, Halo" while the makers ignore the real fans.

Case in point
Socom, call of duty, loads of sports games and many others.

Your best bet is to post on 343. Not alot bungie can do anymore
B.net is troll food.

  • 12.22.2011 3:56 PM PDT

Posted by: Fos Tis Krisis
Brutes aren't monkeys, Brutes are gorillas. Humans are monkeys, and Spartans are Orangutans.

Reach isn't broken. Bad gameplay is mainly because of players not cooperating enough. As soon as you have a team playing well toghether, the game rocks.

Online is filled with non-voice-chatting lone wolfers, and that's a playstyle that works with any matchmode of COD.

Reach is fine.

  • 12.23.2011 3:11 AM PDT

GT: j0sh291
"Gentlemen. I be placed at a bewilderment. There I were, resting, when I hear a frightful row on deck. What be that first mate?"
-"Mutiny. And what fate befalls mutineers? I think we know the answer to that, don't we? Mutineers...HANG!!!"

Twitter:@j0sh291
Follower of Christ!

][-][ //-\\ ][_ ((_))

I agree, Reach is an abomination to Halo.

My opinion is that Bungie needed more time, and Reach was just rushed.

[Edited on 12.23.2011 3:32 AM PST]

  • 12.23.2011 3:30 AM PDT

My First account: MC VS ARBITER
My main account: xMCxVSxARBITERx
My new accounts: Legendifier & Melting Fire (I = i)


Posted by: Jose291
I agree, Reach is an abomination to Halo.

My opinion is that Bungie needed more time, and Reach was just rushed.


I think they just wanted to get done with it and start something new and therefore this "rushed" Reach.

[Edited on 12.23.2011 3:41 AM PST]

  • 12.23.2011 3:41 AM PDT

GT: j0sh291
"Gentlemen. I be placed at a bewilderment. There I were, resting, when I hear a frightful row on deck. What be that first mate?"
-"Mutiny. And what fate befalls mutineers? I think we know the answer to that, don't we? Mutineers...HANG!!!"

Twitter:@j0sh291
Follower of Christ!

][-][ //-\\ ][_ ((_))


Posted by: xMCxVSxARBITERx

Posted by: Jose291
I agree, Reach is an abomination to Halo.

My opinion is that Bungie needed more time, and Reach was just rushed.


I think they just wanted to get done with it and start something new and therefore this "rushed" Reach.

Maybe, because if you remember when Reach was still in development, Bungie promise different things, bigger scale battles and more stuff. At like what? 3 months before release, they started cutting many things of the campaign which at the end, it was the worst idea to do. Tip of the Spear the "large scale battle ever made" lasted just 1 or 2 minutes after that you walk...

[Edited on 12.23.2011 3:45 AM PST]

  • 12.23.2011 3:45 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I'm surprised it's that high, tbh.

  • 12.23.2011 5:38 AM PDT

*reminisces when the Bungie/Halo community wasn't made up of CoD kids*
*sighs*
*activates time-machine and sets the clock back to Nov. 9, 2004*
glory days here I come..
*vanishes*

I can't believe it's being beaten by FIFA.

  • 12.23.2011 5:42 AM PDT

Puts the win in 'FTW'

Reach is a fun game, and yes, whilst bloom etc. is annoying, it doesn't totally break the game... (although, if i want to play customs, I play H3.)

[Edited on 12.23.2011 6:00 AM PST]

  • 12.23.2011 5:59 AM PDT

I find it funny how Halo reach, a BUNGIE game, is in 7TH place, of all places. Maybe they did this on purpose (made the game slightly worse) so that their final game could be number 7?!

  • 12.23.2011 6:08 AM PDT

Halo 3 FTW!

  • 12.23.2011 6:15 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

It's been quite a while..


Posted by: tsujen
Omgosh it's the #7 game played played out of thousands of titles?!?! That's horrible guys!


as long as I can get inn a game quicker then anyway cod kid can, then I don't care about population

  • 12.23.2011 6:27 AM PDT