- Plunderfuq
- |
- Honorable Member
Posted by: Apocalypse
Posted by: Plunderfuq
Your premise is that those that detract from it have more of a valid opinion than I do, I enjoy the game so I play. Those that do not like the game play as well, if there is a lack of logic in anybodies thought proccess, it is not mine.
Can you make logical rebuttals against their arguments as to why its a bad game? I can, but logic is judged to be so by you currently and forgive me for saying this, I believe you have made judgements about my logic before it has been written.
[quoteDo you know what their arguments even are?I do, I have been watching two forums for a year, trust me, I am well aware of the list of things "competitive" players think is wrong with Reach. At this point, after a year the arguments are still the same basic ones, just different reasons. Example: AL was OP, now its unbalanced or breaks the flow of play or all of them.
All I've gotten from you is that you think its a good game, simply because you enjoy playing it and will play it regardless.Then I should simplify my meaning: If after a year, you still play Reach, but have continued to have more bad to say about it then good, you are frankly losing credibility by the day. The mechanics have nothing to do with what peoples problem is with Reach, the problem is that the mechanics contained within Reach allow what would be called a "casual" by people who call themselves "competitive" to beat the same "competitive" player and "competitive" players are basicly throughing a temper tantrum. This temper tantrum manifest itself in the form of a year long bashing campaign against Reach and the people that enjoy it, that is franly laughable. Keep blaming bloom, and AA for your inability to play Halo as well as you use to, unfortunatly for the competitive player, Reach is Halo.
That's all fine and dandy, you've already said its a good game to you.
How ever that is not an actual logical rebuttal to use in an argument. Again it is pointless for someone such as yourself to try to be in a discussion about this. You can simply continue to play games you enjoy, regardless. Logical rebutals expand farther than bloom and AA for the reason why they are valid, perhaps you should rejoin your debate class and relearn the finite rules of debating. Or perhaps retake your courses on philosophy as I believe you have missed the point of the debate and my logic.
[Edited on 12.19.2011 11:11 AM PST]