that is, compared to reach, in the same way halo 2's at the time dissapointing campaign seemed so charming (and now three times as charming) when halo 3 came out.. now halo 3's campaign with all its color, veriety, rather huge battles with scarubs, and its relative sillyness seem so desirable to play again.
what i feel let down halo 3's campaign was too many predictable and rather boring vehicle sections.. but still, it was a pretty awsome and huge journy compared to reach which feels like a short, uneventfull, anti-climactic episode which ends in your defeat no matter how well you play.
im not complaining really, thats why im on the halo 3 forum, not the reach forum, so i can discuss it with like-minded people.
plus, halo 3's multiplayer in my opinion was just so good. most of the maps had distinct atmosphere, as did the maps in halo 2.
snarl.