- Apocalypse
- |
- Fabled Heroic Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: MR E0S
On to the hard facts.
1. Gun game wouldn't really work too well in Halo. Because there are not enough different weapons.
As for the dumbasses crying about how power-weapons would completely ruin it. You obviously don't understand the concept of gun-game.
2. Start out with the most powerful weapons and slowly get pushed towards the weaker weapons as you get more kills.
I.E. You start with rockets, get 2 kills...etc. etc. until you're about to win and being forced to used the worst weapon in the game to get the final kills.
Gun Game works, if you're not an idiot and realize how it SHOULD work.
More than likely you're running the entire concept of Gungame through your heads either randomly or completely backwards.
The better you do, the more the game handicaps you. That's the way it supposed to work. The challenge scales to the player.
So next time..vote yes.
Cause your reasons for voting no...are -blam!- pathetic.
1. Halo has a lot of weapons, not as much as CoD but it gets new weapons added with each new release. Its hard to balance them all out and give them all uses because theres so many. More is not always better.
Weapons wouldn't be an issue. Lets use Reachs weapons for an example (didn't use all of them).
You could use Plasma Pistol, Rifle, Repeater, Sword, Pistol, Grenade Launcher, Needle Rifle, DMR, Sniper, Rockets.
10 weapons, 2 kills each, score goes up to 20 or something.
Start off with weaker weapons and get rewarded with better weapons the better you do.
2. Sorry what? I don't have too much experience with CoD or gun game. Isn't the concept to start off with bad weapons and as you do better you get better guns? You also get set back a gun (or something) when you get killed.
Starting out with Rockets would be a terrible idea, would be a ton better if it were the last weapon.
[Edited on 12.22.2011 3:52 PM PST]