Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: I say whiners (including MLG's) and H3-lone wolfes destroyed Reach
  • Subject: I say whiners (including MLG's) and H3-lone wolfes destroyed Reach
Subject: I say whiners (including MLG's) and H3-lone wolfes destroyed Reach

In what version of MLG gametypes does Sprint exist as a starting ability where melees are at 100% (2 melee to kill)? None that I know of.

Your argument is based off of this misconception and the sooner I break it the sooner you entire argument comes crumbling down on itself.

  • 12.24.2011 4:10 AM PDT


Posted by: MajorGroove
In what version of MLG gametypes does Sprint exist as a starting ability where melees are at 100% (2 melee to kill)? None that I know of.

Your argument is based off of this misconception and the sooner I break it the sooner you entire argument comes crumbling down on itself.

Listen you idiot.
I am not only talking about MLG.
I am talking about ALL forums of Halo Reach.

  • 12.24.2011 4:12 AM PDT

So wait, let me catch up. Your argument originally consisted of touting how MLG removed Sprint so it must not be competitive.

Now we aren't talking about MLG at all? Lol kid. Learn to debate.

  • 12.24.2011 4:14 AM PDT


Posted by: MajorGroove
So wait, let me catch up. Your argument originally consisted of touting how MLG removed Sprint so it must not be competitive.

Now we aren't talking about MLG at all? Lol kid. Learn to debate.

My argument originally was that all AA's are broken.
We only went to MLG because because I used it to point out how Halo is better at a competitive level without it.
And in my last post said we're talking about all types of Halo.
Which includes MLG.
lol kid. Learn not to be stupid.

  • 12.24.2011 4:18 AM PDT

I don't have the energy to go quote all your posts in chronological order before you edit them but I think we both know I have used your face as a mop in this debate. Good game.

[Edited on 12.24.2011 4:23 AM PST]

  • 12.24.2011 4:22 AM PDT


Posted by: MajorGroove
I don't have the energy to go quote all your posts in chronological order before you edit them but I think we both know I have used your face as athe mop in this debate. Good game.

That's why everyone was against you.
Good game, you give up, you lose.

  • 12.24.2011 4:23 AM PDT

In memory of those fallen in the defense of Earth and her colonies.

March 3, 2553

The game CHANGED because it wasnt POPULAR and was just a bunch of horrible unbalanced gameplay with poorly implemented CoD mechanics. The game was CHANGED to make it better, but because Sage doesnt know how to make a weapon sandbox or a game for that matter the broken gameplay CANT be fixed but slightly improved.

YOU might like lolreach, but hundreds of thousands of Halo fans left because of Reach not being the game they loved, just somer commercialised crap. FACTS back this up. If lolreach still existed in every playlist, this game would have been dead faster.

  • 12.24.2011 4:31 AM PDT

The WorkPLace<3
(Formerly Halo 3 In The WorkPLace)
Owners Of The Katana <3

Based on population numbers and countless other threads and discussions, they all disagree.

Team games are fine and all, but when there isn't a chance for individual skill to really shine through and there is no real skill gap, the game loses interest very quickly.

Toss that in with piss poor maps from the get-go, AAs that are blatantly better than others, an easy to use sniper, and reticle bloom, people just get annoyed. They don't care about a team game. It isn't as fun to them.

  • 12.24.2011 4:34 AM PDT

In memory of those fallen in the defense of Earth and her colonies.

March 3, 2553


Posted by: UselessTrash

Posted by: FaxMeApplejuice
If by 'destroyed' you mean 'brought forth a more Halo like gameplay experience" then you're welcome.


It's a new game. They should just have shut up and accepted the change of things really.

Look today, Halo is almost extinct from the MLG. All whining caused it. And they changed too much of everything in the MLG-cirucuit. No casual recognize what the hell is happening in those matches.


No no no. MLG is removing Reach because people don't like to play OR watch it.

Halo 2 and 3 were basically the same in the MLG circuit. Reach was completely different and Halo is being taken off the main stage..... hmmmm do you see a trend there?

  • 12.24.2011 4:40 AM PDT

-/
/
|(::)(::)(::)|
|(::)(::)(::)|
|(::)(::)(::)|
|(::)(::)(::)|
[[[[[[[[]]]]]]]

MLG?

  • 12.24.2011 4:48 AM PDT

In memory of those fallen in the defense of Earth and her colonies.

March 3, 2553


Posted by: Xerzaph
MLG?


ahah. Love it. I remember that :D

  • 12.24.2011 4:57 AM PDT


Posted by: UselessTrash
If you have, you realize the balance becomed completely skewed, all weapons except the DMR/pistol is useless.
Every weapon other than the DMR/Pistol/Power weapons are useless in full bloom anyway. No one picks up the weapons in either gametype

  • 12.24.2011 5:13 AM PDT

3 years and only 1 ban, try harder next time noobs.

Like there would have been anything wrong with them releasing Halo 3. (points if you get the joke)

  • 12.24.2011 5:15 AM PDT
  • gamertag: Rakive
  • user homepage:

You must confront your inabilities
You must adjust to your capabilities

Coming this winter to you its FLAME WAR. You take on all of the non stop bickering in forums with your ROFLCOPTER. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

  • 12.24.2011 9:30 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Hey, I left the game because of the combination of the 'one-armed-bandit' matchmaking system and the quitban.

Not because of AA's or Bloom.

I left because I think being forced to play in a limited selection of playlist with gametype/map combo's that are already pre-determined for me is not the kind of game I want to support.

Pick just about any other FPS game out there...
That game allows me to pick the exact MAP I want to play on.
It lets me pick the exact gametype I want to play.
It lets me pick according to my ping.
It lets me leave whenever the -blam!- I want if I'm not competing with the current players in that room.

You people who -blam!- about AA's and Bloom are just -blam!- retarded.

And if AA's and Bloom are the reason you left, or you think people left. You really are the biggest -blam!- worthless whiners on the internet.

Because if Matchmaking was done right. Your issues with those problems wouldn't even be issues.



Halo would have been great if I could have said. I want to find a room that is playing Multi/Flag CTF on Bloodgulch, with certain AA's Removed.

Instead we have to come onto a forum and -blam!- at Bungie/343 to update their playlists, which takes them forever to do.
Which in turns satisfies only a select few people and completely alienates the people who enjoyed the original settings for that playlist.

If you are wasting your time -blam!-ing about anything other than the way Matchmaking is handling the community....
YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME!

And if you even mention customs, I will punch you through my monitor.

[Edited on 12.24.2011 9:50 AM PST]

  • 12.24.2011 9:45 AM PDT


Posted by: MR E0S
Halo 2 and 3 had these Matchmaking settings and they were extremely popular. The problem with Reach is not the Matchmaking system (although with matches being unfair 90% of the time and the interface being plain ugly I consider it a step back from Halo 3), it's that the gameplay changed too much in a bad way.

  • 12.24.2011 9:52 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Really, cause all I wanted to play was multi flag ctf on bloodgulch.

IT took me forever just to get into that 1 game. Constantly being forced to play Team Slayers on stupid maps because of a vote...
And when I finally got to play what I wanted to play... I realized that Bungie had completely -blam!- it up by adding way to many vehicles into it.

Call me boring for wanting to play that map/gametype this far into the franchise. But that is what defined Halo for me.

Halo 2/3 were no better technically. They just had better pre-determined settings. But it's still not right to limit your entire community to a select handful of playlist with game settings that are determined by the developer instead of the community.

The Developer can make the game...
But when it comes down to how we play it...
We decide that..NOT THEM!

[Edited on 12.24.2011 9:58 AM PST]

  • 12.24.2011 9:54 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: MajorGroove
If someone starts to run away, you should have at least 3 shots in them right? If you don't have 3 shots in them before they run away then you engaged them when they were too close to cover. If you do have 3 shots in them then getting those last two shots in them shouldn't be a problem as they turn 180 degrees around, begin to sprint, then finally sprint away.

Major just stop. You have a .8 in mlg clearly you couldn't get those last 2 shots in. Get out of btb and slayer and maybe you will play against people who are smart enough to use sprint right.

  • 12.24.2011 10:11 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: cameo_cream

MLG is removing Reach because people don't like to play OR watch it.



Ummm last i checked mlg never made an announcement they were removing reach from mlg :/

  • 12.24.2011 10:16 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: MajorGroove
Wait, if you are using MLG as your reference you can't also claim double melees as problem. You would have to claim triple melees as a problem. You can't dip into MLG settings when they suit your argument but ignore them when they don't.

Hey guess what its a double melee now in mlg because of bleedthrough. You clearly dont know what you are talking about. Puma was pretty much right in everything he said mlg took out sprint because players could make bad decisions and get away with it. now without sprint you have to actually think before rushing into something or you will die.

  • 12.24.2011 10:27 AM PDT

chances are I don't care who you are or what you say.

nope nope nope

  • 12.24.2011 10:46 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Fabled Legendary Member

No, you're wrong.

  • 12.24.2011 10:51 AM PDT

I mean after all it is Halo:Reach, not Halo 4. I think Bungie purposely made a departure from the "Halo" formula because in essence they were not making a a "Halo" game. The fact that it had Halo in the title was just a tie to the storyline, all be it a loose tie.

Posted by: MajorGroove
I look at Halo Reach as a long term public beta Halo 4.

Things to keep:
-sprint for Spartans
-evade for Elites
-the idea of Jetpack
-single shot utility weapon
-improved Forge
-more custom game options

  • 12.24.2011 10:55 AM PDT

Posted by: Tom T
Prolonged exposure to this forum is bad for your health.


Posted by: aBIueBooksheIf
because I like pen­is.

source


Posted by: MR E0S


How do you remember how to breathe?

[Edited on 12.24.2011 11:46 AM PST]

  • 12.24.2011 11:45 AM PDT