- ROBERTO jh
- |
- Fabled Heroic Member
I don't understand how people think Shepard could possibly win. Fundamentally, Chief is stronger, faster, smarter and better trained then Shepard. Though Shep's weapons are obviously more advanced, do you really think his shields would be able to handle a ton or two of force per punch? Or would he really be able to hit him, as he's running at 80-100+ KPH with armor on?
Yes, he has biotics, but if Biotics were as powerful as they'd need to be to kill the Chief, then any Biotic player in the games should win by default.
OP is also assuming we're rolling all possible Shepard characters into one. Alright then; John would get Cortana and every weapon possible.
Posted by: ThePredkiller2
Super human tactics and super human stealth.
Yes, but if I list this for John (as I am assuming you meant), I would also have to list it for Shepard, as his tactics in the end, have resulted in the destruction of the Collectors, the Shadow Broker, and an entire solar system. I think you are heavily underestimating David here. ;)
Ignoring the fact none of that has anything to do with his super human strength or speed (of which neither of seen any proof of, despite having played through both games twice; if they are present, they are light years away from being anywhere close to the Master Chief's super human abilities, even without armor), just because Master Chief is listed as having super human strength and speed does not automatically mean Shepard must be listed as having the same traits.
If I recall, his strength and speed is boosted only as a soldier class. So, you're giving him the Soldier's benefits. In that case, he has no infiltrator or Biotic powers, or any of the other classes. Pick a Shepard and run with it, don't roll all of them into one. That's extreme bias.
[Edited on 12.29.2011 11:06 AM PST]