- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
I'll admit that Reach is an OK game, I prefer Halo 3/ODST more. But I'm starting to think now that 343i are becoming a bit lazy and careless. I can't seem to understand why they would take away the DLC playlist, because of low population? Bull-blam!-! All those DLC owners were happy until you took away their playlist. 343i, why did you do that?
There are two options to cure this problem. Either make most of the playlists DLC required, example: BTB, Action Sack, Living Dead, etc. Or make the existing DLC free for all those cheap bastards who couldn't risk 8 quid. You'll be doing the community a favour either way.
Something else I can't put my finger, why did they remove Limited? Wasn't it as close as it could get to the ODST-survival Firefight mode. Probably another "Population too low" lame-ass excuse. You're just as bad as Bungie for making sloppy mistakes. Well I will give you benefit of the doubt since you didn't make Reach, but instead trying to fix this game to make it somewhat tolerable.
I will be looking foward to Halo 4, but if this turns out just like Reach... well, most of you will probably know the end result. I will lay off the judging until I see some solid gameplay. I don't usually complain, but this is an one-off.
I probably won't post this in the Waypoint forums due to chances of getting banned. The mods over there are too ban-happy for their own good.
Here is the TL;DR version for those who are too damn-lazy to read this: Do you think Halo Reach will last long? Do you approve or disapprove 343i's actions?