Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: who did better with reach, bungie or 343?
  • Subject: who did better with reach, bungie or 343?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: who did better with reach, bungie or 343?


Posted by: redninga11
thanks for the info but i still think that 343 has done better

Are you #@!(ing RETARDED?
They've done nothing at all yet.
NOTHING.
I'm just waiting for the failure of Halo 4.
All they've done is CTRL+C and CTRL+V Bungie's work with Halo Reach Graphics.
Please, gtfo.

  • 12.31.2011 7:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Level. Get on it.


Posted by: RC Clone
Nope. SouthPole isn't a person. He's the avatar of the force of tryhards everywhere. He stalks the web looking for retards to set straight. He can not be stopped by mere bans or thread locks for he shall rise anew.


Posted by: PretendHome

Posted by: redninga11
thanks for the info but i still think that 343 has done better

Are you #@!(ing RETARDED?
They've done nothing at all yet.
NOTHING.
I'm just waiting for the failure of Halo 4.
All they've done is CTRL+C and CTRL+V Bungie's work with Halo Reach Graphics.
Please, gtfo.


343 made the TU and gave the people what they wanted. They have also shown nothing but dedication and respect to both the Halo franchise and the fans.

That's a lot more than Bungie has done with the actual failure they call Reach.

  • 12.31.2011 7:42 PM PDT

the gun pointed at the head of the universe

I prefer bungie, and you can't really blame them for wanting to move on. All things considered, I think they did Reach justice. It's not Halo 2, 3, ODST or even CE, it's just Reach. Suck it up.

343 I just call microsoft. I suppose they've got the heft to do good things with halo; I worry they'll lose the spirit of the halo Universe, but I'm surprisingly happy with the terminal content they added to CEA... *shrugs* only time will tell.

  • 12.31.2011 8:52 PM PDT

Posted by: Tom T
Prolonged exposure to this forum is bad for your health.


Posted by: aBIueBooksheIf
because I like pen­is.

source


Posted by: EvilCow090
@Chinron041 We are both the minority apparently... :(
I like bloom because it makes the game more it's own. In doing so, you can't bullet spam to get kills and that you have to pace shots. I really like it. :D



Take those pants off your head.
Spamming is the "way-to-go" in DMR duels.

  • 12.31.2011 8:55 PM PDT


Posted by: SouthPoIe

343 made the TU and gave the people what they wanted. They have also shown nothing but dedication and respect to both the Halo franchise and the fans.

It's going to great when the retards get their way with Halo 4, isn't it?

  • 12.31.2011 8:56 PM PDT

THATS MY COOL MAN I CAN'T TAKE IT OFF!

Posted by: Capt Twist
I think they did Reach justice.


Casey Anthony did her baby more justice.

  • 12.31.2011 9:08 PM PDT

Good character is not formed in a week or a month. It is created little by little, day by day. Protracted and patient effort is needed to develop good character.

I would pick Bungie over 343i any day.

  • 12.31.2011 9:12 PM PDT

the gun pointed at the head of the universe


Posted by: Andrei Chikatilo
Posted by: Capt Twist
I think they did Reach justice.


Casey Anthony did her baby more justice.


At least a dingo didn't steal it.

  • 12.31.2011 9:28 PM PDT

Two makes there more than speakers.


Posted by: RustedEdge
Neither.

  • 12.31.2011 9:29 PM PDT

Posted by: aBlueBookshelf
Goat was famous. Irie was infamous. Gh0st was FaMaS.

reach still sucks though

  • 12.31.2011 9:33 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Main GT, now permanently banned: DISORDERRRRRRRR
Before you gamestalk me, my H3 Exp is boosted because I'm not playing 5000 games again like I did on my main account for my 5 star. I AFKed and Grif boosted wtih supers0ak to get to Inheritor since I'm impatient when it comes to processional ranks. Nothing in Reach shows skill unless you play with the person anyways.
50:LW 50:TD 50:MLG 50:TS 50:TSW
My Youtube


Posted by: SkyFighta65
reach still sucks though

  • 12.31.2011 9:49 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Banned just for calling someone retarded? lolBnet mods
Duardo = retard

So you think Reach is an actual Halo game, huh? LOL
Jesus! There's a BoB in ma Falcon!

Well lets see. Bungie made millons of mistakes with Reach and 343i hasn't decided to fix ANY of those mistakes, so neither.

[Edited on 12.31.2011 9:51 PM PST]

  • 12.31.2011 9:51 PM PDT

Bungie >343

sorry to say ive been a bungie fan since day one of halo CE

sorry 343 didnt get my vote

  • 12.31.2011 10:44 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Honorable Member
  • gamertag: Tkdk4
  • user homepage:


Posted by: redninga11
in my opinion, 343. with the maps that bungie came out with, i was disapointed.343, they remastered the old halo maps (which i garentee that bungie could never of done that). bungie is stupid because they made bloom, i am glad 343 took out bloom when they took over halo.


Are you retarded or just trolling?
Bungie made those maps great years ago, thats why 343i remastered them. One of them was remastered TWICE!.

You can think what you want about bloom, I like it because whining children can blame that instead of saying I'm a cheater or some other -blam!-.

  • 12.31.2011 11:46 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Member

Posted by: RustedEdge
Neither.
This.

No matter how much you try to clean and polish -blam!-, it will always be -blam!-.

  • 12.31.2011 11:56 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Blwulf
  • user homepage:

Posted by: ZealotTheSecond
Posted by: Evil Lemon325
I would willingly drive to best buy, pay $59.99 plus tax, then drive home, and put it in my disc drive.
What Now!

You pervert! You just crossed the line....

Hey guys. 343 barely has done anything yet (officially), and 75% of their staff is Bungie, if not more. So your all telling me your going to compare their additions to the game (which, lets be honest, should have been just forge) when they are the same staff? You guys act like they had different views on this game. They were collaborating to make this game, sharing the same concepts and views. The chance of a large argument that would have had any significance is highly unlikely.

  • 01.01.2012 12:09 AM PDT

Posted by: Blwulf
75% of their staff is Bungie, if not more.
343 doesn't even have a total of 5 people that have ever worked at Bungie.

  • 01.01.2012 12:24 AM PDT


Posted by: Blwulf
75% of their staff is Bungie, if not more.
This is wrong, but what they do have is 250+ people who are vets from all over the industry (Reto, MGS, iD studios and ect).

  • 01.01.2012 12:27 AM PDT


Posted by: SouthPoIe

Posted by: PretendHome

Posted by: redninga11
thanks for the info but i still think that 343 has done better

Are you #@!(ing RETARDED?
They've done nothing at all yet.
NOTHING.
I'm just waiting for the failure of Halo 4.
All they've done is CTRL+C and CTRL+V Bungie's work with Halo Reach Graphics.
Please, gtfo.


343 made the TU and gave the people what they wanted. They have also shown nothing but dedication and respect to both the Halo franchise and the fans.

That's a lot more than Bungie has done with the actual failure they call Reach.
Fans asked for Jetpacks (directly). Fans asked for Bloom (a way to make the 'BR' effective at longer ranges but ineffective at short range [the fact it wasn't implemented correctly is irrelevant]). Fans asked for Armor Abilities (asked for equipment at the start of games and for it to be developed more [also noting how the fans HATED equipment when it first came out]). Fans asked for giant Forge Maps with a huge palette (which they got at the expense of polish, but it was still given). Fans asked for the changes to theater to be made (ability to have clips in FF and Campaign for instance). Fans told them these things were fine in the Beta.

Funny how ignorant you sound when you actually put your argument next to facts, isn't it?

  • 01.01.2012 12:31 AM PDT

"To me, a nice triple kill with the sniper is infinitely more impressive than any Living Dead Killionaire"

Does flaming people on forums count as an esport?

I'm a commendation/achievement/statistics freak.

-David (Drake)

@EvilCow090 I'm in your minority! I've gotten so used to bloom that I can out-DMR almost anyone with it, but I can't play MLG ZB to save my life. I think too many people expected Reach to be a Halo 3.5

  • 01.01.2012 12:34 AM PDT

"To me, a nice triple kill with the sniper is infinitely more impressive than any Living Dead Killionaire"

Does flaming people on forums count as an esport?

I'm a commendation/achievement/statistics freak.

-David (Drake)

@EvilCow090 I'm in your minority! I've gotten so used to bloom that I can out-DMR almost anyone with it, but I can't play MLG ZB to save my life. I think too many people expected Reach to be a Halo 3.5

  • 01.01.2012 12:36 AM PDT

I <3 Halo:Reach - amazingly fun and best campaign + amazing Soundtrack
I <3 Halo 3:ODST - best soundtrack + Firefight + Coastal Highway and Mombassa Streets, amazingly unique campaign.
I <3 Halo 3 - best multiplayer levels + Forge + best Custom Games + soundtrack
I <3 Halo 2 - amazing huge fun campaign + soundtrack + Fun multiplayer
I <3 Halo: CE - started it all

Bungie? Anyone with a brain should be saying Bungie. They created the Halo universe, not to mention Halo:Reach? All 343 did was create Bungies game again, and change bloom, something Bungie could have easily done but didn't, because they knew Halo:CEA was being created.

  • 01.01.2012 12:36 AM PDT

343 has mostly been fixing those issues though, to ignore that is also stupid. Bloom in its default state was just no good. the new 85% and 0% options we have are much better. Also the team working on the TU was only a team of a few people (I think they actually said it was one guy when asked at Halo Fest).

Fact is that no one should really even be comparing 343i to Bungie just yet. When Halo 4 comes out then sure the comparisons can fly because Halo 4 is 343i's first real in studio game.

EDIT: I am aware this is a "Who did better with REACH" thread but again you cant compare what a full studio did with what a very small team did with a title update.

[Edited on 01.01.2012 12:44 AM PST]

  • 01.01.2012 12:36 AM PDT

GT: j0sh291
"Gentlemen. I be placed at a bewilderment. There I were, resting, when I hear a frightful row on deck. What be that first mate?"
-"Mutiny. And what fate befalls mutineers? I think we know the answer to that, don't we? Mutineers...HANG!!!"

Twitter:@j0sh291
Follower of Christ!

][-][ //-\\ ][_ ((_))

Neither.

Bungie because of the excuse of passing the "torch" did not do NOTHING for a change for Reach besides adding playlists and doing it wrong with wrongs settings...

343 just had Reach for like 4 or 5 months and besides the famous Title Update which it needs to be fixed still, they have done thing.

Reach was just a bad game, rushed, and clearly the people behind the project were not fully committed to it. What I think is that Bungie made that on purpose to get angry MS.

[Edited on 01.01.2012 12:59 AM PST]

  • 01.01.2012 12:53 AM PDT

R.I.P CrunchyBoi 22 (old profile)

Do I even have to answer this?

  • 01.01.2012 2:09 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3