Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: What is considered a good KD?
  • Subject: What is considered a good KD?
Subject: What is considered a good KD?

Posted by: Hollows
TURTLES R SCARY

fkn lol

Is my KD good or bad?
How could I get better?

[Edited on 01.01.2012 11:13 AM PST]

  • 01.01.2012 10:59 AM PDT

Anything above 1.2 is ok. Atleast you help your team and not stare at the respawn.

  • 01.01.2012 11:00 AM PDT

not by reachs standards.

1.50 and above is okay by me.

  • 01.01.2012 11:01 AM PDT

Inheritor # 1,117 Overall via HaloCharts
Inheritor # 275 in United States

About average. Not great, but not bad. Personally id say anything above 1.25 means your useful and dont drag your team down.

  • 01.01.2012 11:01 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Fabled Legendary Member
  • gamertag: tsujen
  • user homepage:

Inheritor #156 :p


Posted by: Chris Vaguecmac
About average. Not great, but not bad. Personally id say anything above 1.25 means your useful and dont drag your team down.
I agree.

  • 01.01.2012 11:02 AM PDT

Posted by: Darkside Eric
So basically... Waypoint is pro-vanilla?

Posted by: Sentox6
Waypoint isn't pro-anything so much as they're just anti-intelligence.

For Reach, a 1.2 or so means that you can pull your own weight.

  • 01.01.2012 11:03 AM PDT

Don't do it wrong...

1.2, its not bad, its not best but still its ok.

  • 01.01.2012 11:05 AM PDT

I consider good generally above 2.0 in default
If Im playing MLG above 1.5 is good

  • 01.01.2012 11:06 AM PDT

The Song Of Nephilim

Xenoblade <3

over 1 really.

  • 01.01.2012 11:09 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Legendary Member

The 343 forums suck. They're full of retarded kids and mods who got butthurt in the B.net forums for being told that they're bad.

It isn't GOOD, but it isn't BAD either. It's just okay.

  • 01.01.2012 11:11 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

RIP Bungie Service Records. You shall be missed.

Anything above 1.1.

  • 01.01.2012 11:14 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Legendary Member

Always up for REACH customs!

A K/D ratio is objectively "good" if it's over 1.00.

Some people have different standards though, if you suck and you go 0.85 you might consider that a good game for yourself. I consider any game above my own KD average (1.5) as good.

[Edited on 01.01.2012 11:21 AM PST]

  • 01.01.2012 11:20 AM PDT


Posted by: the pib
A K/D ratio is objectively "good" if it's over 1.00.

Some people have different standards though, if you suck and you go 0.85 you might consider that a good game for yourself. I consider any game above my own KD average (1.5) as good.

Wouldn't the average K/D actually be below 1.0 because of suicides?

  • 01.01.2012 11:25 AM PDT

Posted by: Hollows
TURTLES R SCARY

fkn lol

Is 1.33 average?

  • 01.01.2012 11:27 AM PDT

My First account: MC VS ARBITER
My main account: xMCxVSxARBITERx
My new accounts: Legendifier & Melting Fire (I = i)

Depends on what you play.

  • 01.01.2012 11:35 AM PDT

Posted by: Hollows
TURTLES R SCARY

fkn lol

I play team slayer and squad slayer.

  • 01.01.2012 11:36 AM PDT

No point to it, when you think about it.

I'd say anything over 1.0, because you at least go even in most matches, although if you're higher than 1.0, you're probably contributing.

  • 01.01.2012 11:38 AM PDT

For every action, there is an equal and opposite airstrike.


Posted by: slayer2142

Posted by: the pib
A K/D ratio is objectively "good" if it's over 1.00.

Some people have different standards though, if you suck and you go 0.85 you might consider that a good game for yourself. I consider any game above my own KD average (1.5) as good.

Wouldn't the average K/D actually be below 1.0 because of suicides?

Which would be balanced out by grenade-spam double kills.

  • 01.01.2012 11:41 AM PDT

I am mediocre

Check out my Youtube Channel
Youtube channel name - XLGstudio

http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/

A Good KD depends on the playlists you play

Player A (Plays MLG,Arena,Doubles) has a 1.5 KD)

Player B (Plays BTB,Objetive,infection has a 3.0 KD)

Player A > Player B

  • 01.01.2012 12:04 PM PDT


Posted by: Random Elite

Posted by: slayer2142

Posted by: the pib
A K/D ratio is objectively "good" if it's over 1.00.

Some people have different standards though, if you suck and you go 0.85 you might consider that a good game for yourself. I consider any game above my own KD average (1.5) as good.

Wouldn't the average K/D actually be below 1.0 because of suicides?

Which would be balanced out by grenade-spam double kills.
For every kill there is a death.

  • 01.01.2012 12:04 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Legendary Member

Always up for REACH customs!


Posted by: slayer2142

Posted by: Random Elite

Posted by: slayer2142

Posted by: the pib
A K/D ratio is objectively "good" if it's over 1.00.

Some people have different standards though, if you suck and you go 0.85 you might consider that a good game for yourself. I consider any game above my own KD average (1.5) as good.

Wouldn't the average K/D actually be below 1.0 because of suicides?

Which would be balanced out by grenade-spam double kills.
For every kill there is a death.

He's right, the average K/D is probably more like 0.98 because of deaths that don't count as kills such as betrayals, suicides, falls, random hazards like fusion coils and kill balls, and kill zones.

So if your K/D is exactly 1.00, you're either slightly above average or perfectly average and extremely careful!

[Edited on 01.01.2012 12:16 PM PST]

  • 01.01.2012 12:12 PM PDT


Posted by: Nephilim713
over 1 really.

  • 01.01.2012 12:13 PM PDT

Posted by: Recon Number 54
Life is a journey, if you spend all of it with your nose in your map, you may miss some of the best parts.

Anything above 1.5

If you're average, you're bad.

  • 01.01.2012 12:13 PM PDT

Posted by: Hollows
TURTLES R SCARY

fkn lol

So I'm bad?

  • 01.01.2012 12:14 PM PDT


Posted by: Demolition 321
So I'm bad?

No, you're good

  • 01.01.2012 12:16 PM PDT