- Sparty14
- |
- Exalted Member
In the Bungie Podcast, they have discussed that they wanted to end Halo after Halo 3. However, their contract with Microsoft required that they make at least two more Halo games, then hand off the series.
With ODST, they had some fun, and explored a new concept and story. Then they had to make one more, and made Reach. Reach was a great game, just not a great Halo game. How hard would you work on a game that you didn't want to make?
Even with the comparative low quality of Reach, they did one thing right. The Networking. They used Reach to work on things for their next game. When making the game they didn't want to make, they were thinking ahead, so that in the future, they may give us another great game.
So, in the end, I don't really think that Bungie belongs in that picture.
Posted by: SUPER MOOSE93
i think bungie could be on there because:
-the made reach
-didnt attempt to fix it properly
-then sold the franchise