- meagsIZbeast
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
- gamertag: Meagss
- user homepage:
I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks
H3 MM warrior
Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.
H4 MM legend
Posted by: Plunderfuq
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
Posted by: Plunderfuq
Posted by: Sentox6
You must be -blam!- with me. The grand sum of your "tremendous" amount of work was to pick your own two accounts?
There is no middle finger big enough.After the qualifications were set by the competitive community, it became clear that without firsthand knowledge of the subject it would be almost impossible to verify if the person was in fact a casual. As is the norm, besides opinion, the competitive players could provide zero examples, perhaps you can change that and present one.
I don't know where you went to school, but I learnt this thing called the base 10 decimal system, where 41 is not "far more" than 56.Forgive my error, it has been corrected to reflect what I meant according to the findings. If there are any other errors or somthing you find to be incorrect, feel free to point it out.
being a casual doesnt mean that person cant have a mic, cant play ranked, etc... Those are generalities and every single qualifications need not be met, that is just a guide line. It just so happens that I meet every single one, but if someone played a little ranked and uses a mic, this does not disqualify someone outright.
thats the point, you used data plots, and generalizations to make yourself the perfect candidate, rather than using someone of unbiased opinion.
Also bookshelf fit perfectly into the mold, being a casual reach and H3 player, yet faring significantly better in reach.
There are about 10,000 forum colonels(exaggerated) that are here that can say they are casuals who fare better at reach than H3. Yet you disqualify bookshelf for playing ranked....